Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have an Omega Speedmaster 1861 which is gaining 55-60 seconds per day. How can you tell if the watch needs a service or just regulating? I have checked the watch for magnetism and it is not magnetised. The watch was originally purchased in 2010. I only wear the watch a few times per month.

I have made a short video of the watch on a Timegrapher .

 

Any suggestions / comments would be most appreciated.

Posted

Have you tested with a compass or actually demagnetized?

If the first, please have the watch demagnetize anyway, and check again.

If the second, my opinion is that regulation will be enough.

  • Like 1
Posted

I would look first to the amplitude. The Omega service spec says the amplitude should be greater than 190deg in the vertical plane 24 hours after a full wind.  However, mine is about 10 months old, and I wound it about 12 hours ago; I just checked it on the timegrapher and the amplitude was 330 degrees, varying by +/-3 in the horizontal plane as yours is shown. In the vertical plane (crown right), this dropped to about 290 degrees, varying by +/- 7

Yours has a lot more variation in the amplitude and timekeeping so I would say it's time for a service.  It will be very difficult to regulate with that kind of variability.

How often you wear the watch is irrelevant. The oils will deteriorate with time regardless of use.  Servicing it now will save you from a bigger bill if you leave it till later.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, StuartBaker104 said:

Yours has a lot more variation in the amplitude and timekeeping so I would say it's time for a service.  It will be very difficult to regulate with that kind of variability.

I do not see a very large variance of amplitude and timekeeping. perhaps a bit more than ideal. but nothing terrible. What would have to be seen is how's behaving in different positions, which he video doesn't show.

Posted

I agree with seeing variation in positions to learn more here.

I saw the amplitude vary from 247 to 267 and timekeeping from +55 to +65 - it's not very obvious as the timegrapher averages over quite long periods. I would love to have this performance on some of my vintage watches, but my speedy does much better!

Posted
19 minutes ago, StuartBaker104 said:

I saw the amplitude vary from 247 to 267 and timekeeping from +55 to +65 - it's not very obvious as the timegrapher averages over quite long periods.

I'm very familiar with that machine. The measurement interval is 40-50 ticks (never counted exactly) and each of the four interval values is shown white on blue. The figure on the top right is not even really averaged but merely copies the last interval value. If there were instantaneous changes in rate one would see them as pattern "waves". Truly a basic instrument.

Posted

Between 5 to 7 years you should have your watch serviced. As far as I'm concerned it depends on the type of work you do, how often you wear your watch, you might be the type of person who removes there watch at work. In other words how long is a piece of string.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

Between 5 to 7 years you should have your watch serviced. As far as I'm concerned it depends on the type of work you do, how often you wear your watch, you might be the type of person who removes there watch at work. In other words how long is a piece of string.

What do you mean? Which types of work would change the service interval? As mentioned above, oils dry up any, no matter if the watch is worn or not.

  • Like 1
Posted

With the types of oils these days, even if you don't wear your watch very often and just give it a wind once a month it will go on for years. If you work in a dirty job the watch is bound to get dirty quicker then if you have an office job. It stands to reason. The same as if you have a round watch case against a square case with two people doing the same job the square watch will get dirty quicker then the round one.

Posted
If you work in a dirty job the watch is bound to get dirty quicker then if you have an office job. It stands to reason.

Nowaday most watches ike the OP's one are water resistant 5 bar or more No water or dust can reach the movement.
Posted

A lot depends on the quality of the casing.

Oil suffers from air and dirt contamination. A new watch with good seals and new oils will be good for more than 5 years.. probably 10 years no problem. But once its opened and the seals are not changed it goes downhill. 

Also older will wear and oil will not be able to compensate for worn parts. That is why when you send back a watch to Omega and Rolex a lot of parts are replaced even if not much wear is apparent.

On older dress watches where the waterproofing is like my swiss bank account (ie.. non-existent) then you'd be lucky to see two years.

Modern synthetic oils do not really go 'off' like the older types.

Anil

Posted
Watch purchased in 2010, service it.





 
Also older will wear and oil will not be able to compensate for worn parts. That is why when you send back a watch to Omega and Rolex a lot of parts are replaced even if not much wear is apparent.

Or it is because the center gets the parts with a large discount?
Posted

Thank-you all for your comments, I'll make another video later today and post showing the watch in different positions. Hopefully it'll show some more information, and aid to the diagnosis. 

Regards

Posted

As promised, here is the video showing the watch in different positions on the timegrapher. 

jdm - when i first checked the watch it was showing that it was magnitised (using a compass)  I then de-magnitised and checked again with a compass (which is showing now that it is not magnitised).

 

Posted

I think this debate could run and run, but I think I saw everything from about +50s to +86s (ignoring for a moment the brief excursion to +100.  I wouldn't expect to see more variation than about 10s if this was running properly.

Also, it is hard to pick out the variation on individual beats when the timimg is that far out, but you should expect each beat to lie on nearly a straight line... to me the trace is too wobbly.

If you could find a watchmaker who would attempt to regulate this for you then you should be looking for someone who will pressure test it after resealing. After 5 years I would be surprised if you didn't need to replace the pusher and crown seals, so my guess is that you could be looking at between £50 and £100.

Anyway, as I said you will get many opinions on this one, but mine will be getting a service before it gets that bad.

Posted
As promised, here is the video showing the watch in different positions on the timegrapher  

It behaves very good, since you have a timegrapher you can also regulate it yourself (let's remember this is a watch repair forum). All you need is a case opening tool, air blower and silicone grease for the seals.
  • Like 1
Posted

Thank you for the comments StuartBaker104I think its worth giving regulating a go first, but i do agree that the watch could do with a service and i will plan one in the not to distant future.

jdm I like your style. I have all the tools and equipment ready. The million dollar question is how do you regulate this movement? Would it be a case of simply turning the screw as per the picture.

Omega Regulate.png

 

Posted
9 hours ago, R1C4 said:

jdm I like your style. I have all the tools and equipment ready. The million dollar question is how do you regulate this movement? Would it be a case of simply turning the screw as per the picture.

Yes, watch the wind and wait 10 - 30 minutes before doing that. The beat error is very small so I would not touch that.  

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Right I have been sailing :D .

I have made a few adjustments trying to get the best overall average.

MOV_1411.mp4

I have taken an average of eight readings for each position (letting the machine run for four readings between position changes to settle out) and then calculated the average of the six different positions.

Average Time.jpg

As this is all measured on the bench the real test will be how the watch performs on the wrist. I'll wear the watch for a week and see how it goes - Ill post the results in a weeks time.  

I'm going to calibrate the time with http://time.is/GMT .

  • Like 2
Posted

Thanks 

I drew the watches and made a spreadsheet which calculates the averages as you type them in. 

I can send it you if you like. 

 

 


  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One of the problems with trying to Photograph Phils things are that his enjoyment was building these things so they tended to E falls on what will see if I can find some earlier pictures or any pictures I wasn't even sure because I was looking for that specific picture for somebody else and even it got the last version and that would have been the last version. You will note that he put the indexing on something that he could unscrew it or whatever and it can slide back out of the way so the rest of the lathe can be used as a lathe. With the lathe cut are actually coming down from the top I was there once where he demonstrated how to cut a pivot with the setup it was really beautiful. Older set up if I remember it's not a worm gear assembly in the thing in between the stepping motor and the holding block I believe this particular one was like a 100 to 1 gear ratio. Earlier version with watchmaker's lathe. Even looks like he is the watchmakers bed and then switch to something he made. Then I do have other pictures and things of the rotary stage in use. In the raw so if you tube videos here is an example of one were somebody's mounting a three jaw chuck. At one time there were available on eBay they were not cheap but if you're patient like I was I found one cheap on eBay. After you watch the video it look at his other videos he is a whole bunch of other examples of the same rotary stage. That I do know there are other pictures examples and possibly videos you just have to track them down. One of the minor issues of finding this particular tech sheet for the unit is I believe it was a custom manufacturer and the company change their name but I remember the new name here's a link to the company https://www.ondrivesus.com/rino-mechanical-components                
    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
×
×
  • Create New...