Jump to content

Recommended Posts

From time to time, I'm unhappy with the watch luminous on a watch I've bought.

 

I normally like to keep things as original as possible and just leave them alone, but sometimes it doesn't do it the watch any favours.

 

Sometimes the hands have been redone in bright green, maybe the hand luminous is falling off due to careless watch repairer, or perhaps the hands have over aged and become black and too dirty to read.

 

So that's where I step in and do my best to getting it looking proper.

 

 

 

First of all, this isn't a tutorial, do this at home at your own risk!

 

I just thought it might be interesting to you guys to see some of my results.

 

I shall post some small tips below though:-

 

1. Mixture is key, too much thinner makes the paint runny, and it won't go where you want it too, too much binder will make it shiny and unnatural looking. (unless it's a modern watch), this is probably the hardest part to get right.

 

2. Leave hands to dry over 24 hours. While it's tempting to put on an hour after, the chemicals will damage certain dials, just from the vapor. 

 

3. Too much luminous paint can make hands curl when they dry, if hands are very thin.

 

4. When putting hands back on, I prefer to set minute and hour hand.

 

5. Sometimes just accept you can't get it perfect. Even original hands sometimes age slightly differently from the dial, perhaps depending on it's thickness or environmental factors.

 

Can't help with pigment advice, I bought a vintage source of waterproof pigments, that were designed to be mixed with eggwhite from an independent person, and it's no longer stocked. All pigments are mixed manually.

 

Tools:

 

1. Hand removers, I mainly use levers, sometimes very rarely I will use the spring type hand remover though.

 

2. Dial guard, used with hand remover (I just made a homemade one).

 

3. Plastic tweezers. hands are very delicate and thinly plated.

 

4. Hand press

 

5. Oiler stick for applying paint. (Have tried a thin brush before like they originally did in the old days, but did not get the results I wanted.) 

 

 

Now that's all said, I have to say my jobs are hit and miss, sometimes I'm quite happy, sometimes I think I should of done better, but it's just how it goes. Feel free to comment on what you think is bad and what you think is good. Also I've only recently decided to share my work, so my best jobs are long gone and never photographed, but I shall try and keep this going as it's something I often do myself when trying to get a watch to be more sellable.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a Buren military watch from the 1940's, someone before me painted the hands bright green and the original luminous turned black and was missing in places. 

 

I decided to redo the hands and dial luminous. (white spots on second picture are from lint which my iphone camera picks up from the strong light source)

post-1618-0-51687100-1457451130_thumb.pn

post-1618-0-83801800-1457451145_thumb.jp

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a Jaeger lecoultre military watch, I probably consider this job a miss. 

 

Original hands were a grimmy mold looking green and I believe someone relumed the dial before hand, a very orangely looking colour. I probably should of relumed the whole dial, but decided just to match the colour they had used. Never the less it sold anyway.

post-1618-0-44491900-1457451328_thumb.jp

post-1618-0-11199600-1457451333_thumb.jp

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This one is another JLC military.

 

Hand luminous was completely missing, however original dial luminous was intact.

 

I decided to add a bit of patina and age to the hands to get this to match the original luminous.

post-1618-0-86933800-1457451573_thumb.jp

post-1618-0-12443700-1457451581_thumb.jp

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would you use for a job on a Seiko that is snow white in aspect and is supposed to glow as below ?

 

24188882743_b76208def5.jpg

I only do vintage watches, so I only have experience with making lume look old. So the luminous glow is slightly dull after pigment is mixed. And this matches the old luminous on watches because the glow strength has weakened as time passes.

 

However from speaking to dial restorers that I know, for glow strength it depends on the quality of the luminous. He told me there are different grades of luminous, and the stuff you and I can buy is pretty much junk. The real stuff comes from Switzerland and can only be ordered industrially.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

However from speaking to dial restorers that I know, for glow strength it depends on the quality of the luminous. He told me there are different grades of luminous, and the stuff you and I can buy is pretty much junk. The real stuff comes from Switzerland and can only be ordered industrially.

 

Or from Japan (lumibrite). The Swiss one should be  this http://www.rctritec.com/?id=13 

Some seller sat they have the real deal, but I've never tried.

 

BTW your relumes look very fine and coherent.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a curiosity question BW, what sort of magnification do you use to achieve these results. I have done a little re luming but never attempted numbers etc. only hands. I am now tempted to dig out an old scrapper and have a go. I would probably have to use my scope as my near sight is on the wane.

Cheers,

Vic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i ordered lume from a seller on the SCWF. he said it was from nemoto, if i remember correctly. i think it was lumibrite.

i got blue and green. haven't used it yet. but i can tell you, the little plastic packets glow like crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a curiosity question BW, what sort of magnification do you use to achieve these results. I have done a little re luming but never attempted numbers etc. only hands. I am now tempted to dig out an old scrapper and have a go. I would probably have to use my scope as my near sight is on the wane.

Cheers,

Vic

I don't use any magnification. I always find using a strong light source much much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice BW. I don't think I could manage even with my reading glasses but I will still have a go using the scope. Do use any particular method to remove old lume from the numbers prior to putting on the new lume.

Cheers,

Vic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice BW. I don't think I could manage even with my reading glasses but I will still have a go using the scope. Do use any particular method to remove old lume from the numbers prior to putting on the new lume.

Cheers,

Vic

 

Yeah, use pegwood, anything harsher will scratch the dial.

 

Use a brush to remove the dust or sometimes rodico if dust is stuck to dial, do not use a air puffer, and put remainder dust on a white of paper, fold and throw out when done. 

 

Why I say do not use an air puffer is because watches under the age of 1950's all use radium.

 

While it's a safer than people make it out to be, you do not want to be breathing it in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, I was referring to the (jewelled) gear train with HP (most of the time, I use 1300, but when Rolex says 1000, I'll use 1000).
    • did I miss the update of the message of something changing?      
    • I suppose it would depend upon what your lubricating with those? for instance what does the manufacturer say about those lubricants? I have a PDF from the manufacture and a rather peculiar statement found on the bottom of the chart. my suspicion is the reason the recommending would be without epilam the HP oils like the spread except when they're in Ruby jewel's with steel pivots. tableEN lubrication 2020.pdf
    • These types of hairsprings become weak with age and very fragile. Which I expect it is that giving you trouble, and that wheel is not the correct one, if it were not bent I don't think the movement would run as the teeth are not the correct height. The problem you have is price which depends on you. It can be repaired but is it worth it to you, because there is little value in the clock. A wheel can be made and hairspring replaced. Or hang on to it and keep looking on ebay which is your best bet for replacement parts or even a complete movement but it will be like finding a needle in a haystack. 
    • I did that also for a few movements - well, mainly in/around the train jewels. I made big efforts to epilame the mainplate WITHOUT getting Epilame into the Pallet fork jewels (where it's not supposed to be, right?). I made litte barriers with Rodico around that jewel and used drops from a syringe to apply on the rest.  However, I've now stopped doing this. For three reasons: 1. It's a hassle and consumes more of this liquid gold. 2. I didn't see the need when using HP1000/HP1300 lubricants and grease for most part. The two places where I'd use 9010 (i.e. escape wheel and balance) receive Epilame in specific places... or the cap-jewel-setting of the balance suspends the oil sufficiently be capillary action (see my "conflict" about using Epilame on the balance jewels).  3. Lastly, and here I really wonder about yours and others' experiences: I felt that applying Epliame to the train jewels left them looking hazy (borderline dirty) compared to the (painstakingly achieved) sparkly clean results of my cleaning process. I just can't help but think that the Epilame residuals would mix with the oil and cause more friction/wear. I don't know.    simple: it'll stay there. It won't move any further. That's exactly what is happening if you epilame a cap stone. You end up placing the 9010 right on top of the epilame and the oil will sit nicely on that spot.
×
×
  • Create New...