Jump to content

Opinions Please


Recommended Posts

Point taken Willfly but a watch is not a living creature. Just to muddy the waters. Rotary "Outsource" some manufacture of there core watches and as such may lead to a different definition. To reiterate though. Omega do not "Outsource " Therefore a watch constructed from parts that cannot be verified by the manufacturer, must be considered "Counterfeit " a watch constructed from all original parts is a non factory " Composition " watch. The value of such would probably not justify the construction of said watch and to sell the watch as an original may well be considered fraudulent.

Tony

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No Will, your point is a good one. Like everybody else. Problem with high end watches, people are buying into a dream or concept. In terms of function does a high end watch justify the cost? I doubt it.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

Omega are not a high end watches, like Rolex they fall into the luxury category. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good topic!!!

 

My perspective: Is it assembled by the manufacturer (did Omega build your Omega watch)? If yes, it's an Omega. If you buy all the parts and assemble your own, you have a watch with all Omega parts but not a "real" Omega. One is an Omega assembled Omega, one is an assembly of Omega parts. The original one comes with a warranty, a serial number and a history (Omega's "signature"). You pay for that. The one you built has none of that, and for some people, it matters.

I agree that the end product is very close to being the same, but not exactly. 

 

Which brings up the point about repairs. If you have an original Omega and you fix a part (NOS part), is it less of an Omega? No, and you can't tell (unless the part happens to have a unique marking, most don't)

To take the argument further, after a simple clean and oil, is your Omega still original (you don't use the exact same oil Omega used originally, even if all the other mechanical parts are the originals)? Of course you do, and nobody would be able to tell!!! However, if you sell your assembled "Omega" as an Omega, it's counterfeiting. Sell it as a watch made of Omega parts, you're fine.

 

For cars, most parts have serial numbers and a brand, so in theory, you could tell if a car is all original or not. I replace some of my car parts by myself, and often by replacement parts that are not branded with the car brand, or "signature" (hyundai). When I sell my car, will I advertise it as a Hyundai or not? Of course I will!!

 

Another example. You buy a reproduction of a painting: it's the exact same as the original. Same dimensions, same picture... It's still a reproduction even if you painted it yourself and used the exact same canvas, paintbrushes and paints as the original!!! Your missing the signature, and it's worth a lo of money to some people. Add the signature, and sell it as an original, and all of a sudden, it's a counterfeit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I went from this:

348902-thumbnail.jpg

to this:

Holden-48-215-_1_.jpg 

 

 

by restoring every part with original NOS items and as much of the original shell as possible it will still be a 48-215 Holden whether it rolled down the production line at the Fishermen's Bend factory in Victoria or out of my garage in the suburbs 60 years later.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you have is a beautifully restored Holden. If you could aquire all genuine parts and started to build Holdens in your garage and then sell them. Well in England you would certainly find yourself in serious legal trouble. Most manufacturers

protect their logo and brand.

Love the car.

Tony

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you have is a beautifully restored Holden. If you could aquire all genuine parts and started to build Holdens in your garage and then sell them. Well in England you would certainly find yourself in serious legal trouble. Most manufacturers

protect their logo and brand.

Love the car.

Tony

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

I wouldn't sell them if I restored them...I'd keep them.  I'd have to by a **BLEEP** big barn though! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bet BMW would react if they started making up bikes in numbers. A one off wouldn't justify the litigation costs. If the bike failed in some mechanical aspect. BMW wouldn't touch it with a barge pole, and would have no legal obligation to do so, as it's not one of their's.

Tony

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

. Just as if you sold a watch in mint condition and the buyer received the item with a scratch on it. The buyer would be entitled to a refund under the "Sale of goods act 1974

Beside the act is from 1979, note that it only applies to transactions in the UK, and for aspects related to description it only applies when the seller does that "in course of business".

Section 14 states that terms are implied about quality and title and are only relevant where the seller is acting in the course of a business. There is no requirement as to the status of the buyer

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sale_of_Goods_Act_1979

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As can be seen. The consumer rights act does much to close loops holes of injustice under previous law and deals with the sale of second hand goods by people who do not necessarily earn a living from said practice. The onus is totally on the seller to describe the article accurately. And mint condition would mean exactly that!

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I also see a bit of danger for the wheel, at least you have to keep away from it and may get a too thick rest ring. My rest rings are about 0.05 mm. Better way would be a grinding wheel touching the staff with its circumference. Frank
    • Not easy to find this one everywhere,  so it depends where you are located. Joining it back together might be possible, i have silver soldered mild steel before even with traditional plumbers lead and its a pretty strong joint, but bere in mind this is only 1mm diameter.  The join would need to be very accurate,  it not something i have heard of anyone trying before. The part no 401 is the swiss code number and relates to watch winding stems in general
    • Thanks everyone for your helpful replies. I think between us we’ve worked out what’s going on. Next job is to have a proper look at this great wheel assembly, see if I can remove the clip and the friction fit pinion, give the bits a good clean, then put it back together with a bit of blue grease. I’ll also get the pallet fork under the microscope to see if it’s ok or been damaged. 
    • The cannon pinion (be it conventional style or what you see in this movement) should slip on its arbour so the hands can be set independently without affecting the gear train.  If there is too much friction between the cannon pinion and the second wheel, turning the hands to set them backwards can sometimes force the escape wheel teeth to overrun the pallet stones, creating the behaviour you describe. The train is running in reverse when this happens.  This can often chip the pallet stones. I’d say at least half of the watches I’ve inspected with very tight cannon pinions had chipped pallet stones. Hopefully this isn’t the case with your watch.  I’m not familiar with this movement but you need to get the friction in the cannon pinion adjusted correctly.  Hope this helps, Mark
    • Pallet fork was in. I’d had the movement running ok, and only removed the balance to flip it over and install the keyless works and date mechanism. The pallet fork wasn’t locking the gear train when hand setting - it was oscillating as the escape wheel rotated. This may have been in one direction only - can’t remember. 
×
×
  • Create New...