Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What do people think about presses for fitting hands?  I sometimes find it difficult to get hands on nice and square. I am using one of those double ended tools with the holes in the end and find they don't have much "feel" to them and I admit that on occasions I do find I have more control using tweezers. Yes I know, sorry!

I just thought that at least with a press everything should be nice and square and then it is just a matter of applying the right amount of pressure.

Posted

I prefer the double ended tool? Have a Bergeon that i use most of time. I don't now if i am doing the right thing. But sometimes a can adjust the sitting of a hand by pressing a little on the front to lower it or on the back to rise it. Just that little adjustment. 

Posted

I use my staking tool to keep things square, and by selecting the appropriate size hollow flat I can make sure that the hand are only pushed onto the top of the pipes. There is even a plain brass tipped stake which I use for seconds hands.

Posted

I'm thinking about buying a mid-priced press, (the amount of use does not justify laying out big coin), since I have learned with tweezers, but finding it more difficult with sweep hands, I have tried stakes also with good results. A press would speed up process.

Posted

The reason I was asking is because I had some chrono hands to fit and I have not done any before. Just tried today and managed ok, sort of had them hovering about near enough in position on a piece of Rodico then nudged them into place and pushed them on with a cocktail stick with the end squared off flat. Had more trouble with the hour hand. I am not sure if a press would have been an advantage with the tiny chrono hands, it might have just obscured things. I do still fancy trying one for normal sized hands, and if I do another chrono it might help.

Posted

I use to use tweezers until I lost a minute hand on an old waltham pocket watch. It was a bit of a tight fit and was probably using too much pressure. The thing pinged off into the unknown and to this day I have never found it. Now I use a staking set. Tweezers are excellent for adjusting minute hands up and down.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

I was wondering about using a staking set. I did get mine out today and pondered whether to give it a try. It did look as if the movement would be quite close to the edge, but still enough to support it ok.

Wouldn't you think that you would be able to get plastic tipped punches to use as hand pushers for a staking set?  I suppose that you have as much chance of marking the hands using tweezers as you would with the end of a punch. I think I will have a go at fitting some hands with the staking set tomorrow. 

Posted

If your budget is tight and you don't do this procedure often, I would suggest sticking to the tweezers or double ended tool from Bergeron. Hope this helps.

Posted

I use an El Cheapo hand press from China, does the job for me, I also have a double ended hand fitting tool with plastic/rubber tips use it quite often when I'm to lazy to grab the press I also use it for setting second hands, have an old home made oiler with a blob of rodico on the tip, hold the hands with that and just press them on.

 

Those chrono sub hands are a real pain in the **BLEEP**, had to change the movement in a Seiko with a 7T62 movement, the dial is only located and secured by the dial feet pushing into holes in the plastic mvt surround, every time I tried to case the movement the dial would move and flip off the sub dial hands, took about 6 tries and I was really p--- off from refiting the hands even considered gluing the dial on!

 

 

Max 

Posted

I use an El Cheapo hand press from China, does the job for me, I also have a double ended hand fitting tool with plastic/rubber tips use it quite often when I'm to lazy to grab the press I also use it for setting second hands, have an old home made oiler with a blob of rodico on the tip, hold the hands with that and just press them on.

 

Those chrono sub hands are a real pain in the **BLEEP**, had to change the movement in a Seiko with a 7T62 movement, the dial is only located and secured by the dial feet pushing into holes in the plastic mvt surround, every time I tried to case the movement the dial would move and flip off the sub dial hands, took about 6 tries and I was really p--- off from refiting the hands even considered gluing the dial on!

 

 

Max 

 

I can only imagine how you felt, fitting a set just the once was stressful enough for me.

Thanks to everyone for the input, the jury is still out at the moment. I won't rush in to anything just yet, but I'll let you know.

Posted

Hi Dave,

 

In my mind and given it is a hobby, it would be a good thing -- also an economic one -- to learn to use the manual double sided "stick" first and then if you still need the press, buy one that justifies the expense. That said, I bought a press (Horotec, expensive) and most of the time it is sitting there laughing at me! Yes, it is somewhat useful and "good" to have but not indispensable... (considering it is a hobby)

 

Just my 2 cents,

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

Posted

Hi Dave,

 

In my mind and given it is a hobby, it would be a good thing -- also an economic one -- to learn to use the manual double sided "stick" first and then if you still need the press, buy one that justifies the expense. That said, I bought a press (Horotec, expensive) and most of the time it is sitting there laughing at me! Yes, it is somewhat useful and "good" to have but not indispensable... (considering it is a hobby)

 

Just my 2 cents,

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

Agreed Bob, kinda like an auto mechanic, it's better to have the tool and not need it, than need the tool and not have it! My two cents is worth exactly that much.....! Thanks

Dave

Posted

Hi Dave,

 

In my mind and given it is a hobby, it would be a good thing -- also an economic one -- to learn to use the manual double sided "stick" first and then if you still need the press, buy one that justifies the expense. That said, I bought a press (Horotec, expensive) and most of the time it is sitting there laughing at me! Yes, it is somewhat useful and "good" to have but not indispensable... (considering it is a hobby)

 

Just my 2 cents,

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

 

 

 

Agreed Bob, kinda like an auto mechanic, it's better to have the tool and not need it, than need the tool and not have it! My two cents is worth exactly that much.....! Thanks

Dave

 

That's the trouble Bob, Dave.  I've always bought the best tools that I could afford (without going mad) throughout my working career as a truck mechanic. They got some real abuse but lasted well. I once spent quite a bit of money on what I thought was a great piece of kit from Snap On, thought it would save me loads of time on certain jobs. It's still lying in the top drawer of my toolbox 30 years later and I doubt I used it more than twice. :biggrin:

But I still love nice tools, that's the problem.

  • Like 1
Posted

I used rodico and the double sided hand tool and had a hell of a time with the minute hand. It was an art to level it off. If I had a hand press, I most likely would modify some of my watches.1303ae2668635984e67d767661d42d02.jpgthis is the beast that needed the hands put back after a repair and cleaning.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

I've found this tool, dressed to a very smooth finish to be of great help when the setting of hands go "left". Great for cheap watches with iffy fitted hands too. They allow to get in between the hands and separate/level too.

 

ofrei-410.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks. I'll have a look. I still think hands should snap into position and not need so much attention to install. Poor engineering. As well, you could have the hands mechanically attached and then snapped onto the movement. There should be no art required, just science:)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I still think hands should snap into position and not need so much attention to install

 

Regretfully, there is no snap to hand setting! :)

Posted

Fitted a couple of sets of hands using my staking set. I found they went on pretty good and were nice and square. A couple of things came to light, first make sure there is no dirt on the inside of the hollow punch. I discovered mine had some preserving grease up there. Also I think that after market hands although they do fit are probably not as close to the tolerances of originals and seem to take a bit of persuasion to seat.

Posted

Double ended tool (not the Bergeon one) works fine for me. Used to use the hand press, but I find the double ender gives more control.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...