Jump to content

Treated Myself - To A Le Coultre From 1956


WillFly

Recommended Posts

I've been buying far fewer watches in the latter half of this year than in previous years - using money for other pursuits - having decided to move away from the selected "cheapies but goodies" on eBay in favour of more considered purchases.

 

The last watch I bought was a Christopher Ward C1000 auto, which I've worn virtually every day since getting it - and very nice it is too - and now I've picked up this very smart Le Coultre from 1956. [seller's] photos:

 

post-64-0-14490500-1449062038_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-78231000-1449062038_thumb.jpg

 

Some info on Le Coultre for those interested:

 

United States duty regulations made it more cost effective to import Jaeger LeCoultre movements, dials, crowns and hands into the USA from Switzerland and for the cases to be manufactured in the States. In the 1950’s the Longines Wittnauer group was the distributor of LeCoultre watches and Vacheron & Constantin watches sold in North America. The Longines Wittnauer group did not manufacture Jaeger LeCoultre watches as some people mistakenly believe, the movements were produced in the Swiss Jaeger LeCoultre factory at Le Sentier and were identical in every way to movements distributed within Europe other than the LeCoultre markings on the watch. The cases were manufactured under licence in the United States and were marked "Cased and Timed in the USA by LeCoultre". In approximately 1985 the brand name "Jaeger LeCoultre" was adopted worldwide.

 

Some people believe that because LeCoultre movements are signed "VXN" on the bridge (denoting Vacheron & Constantin), they were manufactured by Vacheron & Constantin. This is incorrect. Jaeger LeCoultre supplied movements to Vacheron & Constantin, which were used in their watches but not vice versa. The only collaboration that ever took place between these two prestigious watchmakers was the "Galaxy" diamond dial model. The Galaxy was marketed by both companies; with the case marked "Vacheron & Constantin - LeCoultre Inc." and the dial signed "LeCoultre".

 

Cheers,

 

Will

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its so nice watch :). Regarding VXN on the movement - many manufactures in Suisse were marking movements with symbols like that - Im sure I have seen a list containing manufacturers and symbols they were using, Pierce if I recall was using PXA.

 

here is a link, not the one I was after but will do: http://mb.nawcc.org/archive/index.php/t-33786.html

Edited by Rafal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice Will, I would imagine the click is on the underside.

Absolutely - but where exactly I wouldn't care to say. Presumably in an equivalent area to a more conventional topside click.

 

To be honest, I don't see the advantage of a buried click, other than neatness, as there's more stripping of the movement to be done if the click spring should break, etc. But who am I...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem solved, watchitis cleared to go...beautiful watch Will, I'm sure you'll get bored to wear it soon so feel free to send it over when you do! :)

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

 

PS. Quality is watchitis stage II, by the way. I'm getting it now too...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm glad I joined this forum.  Now I realise that I am not alone in having this mania to buy watches!  Will...that is one beautiful watch.  It reminds me of two watches my father owned (and which I cannot, for the life of me, find) one was a LANCO and the other was a Grimsel.  They both kept wonderful time...only going out by about ten seconds a day, if that.

 

Like you I am often on "Fleabay" looking at what make a good cheap purchase.  What amazes me is the way the Chinese have moved along in making nice-looking automatic watches with complications.  Some even look like they have tourbillon movements.  The higher priced ones might really be tourbillons!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 mm. that's about right for a 50's watch. i love their style, but i need at least a 35 to 38mm watch to make it look halfway decent on my wrist.

i have an almost perfect 10 bulova auto that i'm looking to sell because i never wear it.  it is 32mm and just too small.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 mm. that's about right for a 50's watch. i love their style, but i need at least a 35 to 38mm watch to make it look halfway decent on my wrist.

i have an almost perfect 10 bulova auto that i'm looking to sell because i never wear it.  it is 32mm and just too small.

I'm in the same boat.  I have a few family heirloom watches that are truly works of art from the 50s and 60s but they are too small for my fat wrist.  They end up looking like kid's watches.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in the same boat.  I have a few family heirloom watches that are truly works of art from the 50s and 60s but they are too small for my fat wrist.  They end up looking like kid's watches.

You can, if you wish, donate watches that are too small for you, to the Watchitis Research Fund. Just drop an email to [email protected] for the address...

:D

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • one little minor problem with your chemistry experiment here which is what exactly is epilam? In other words is it an exact substance with the chemical you specify or is it a term? For instance originally it was steric acid either dissolved in some sort of solvent or it was applied by vaporizing it. Then now it's all kinds of different things the watch companies all have different ideas there's a whole bunch of patents. So is not always an exact substance.   let me snip out a image from the patent that I attached up above. Notice I highlighted something it seems to disagree with your evaluation.  
    • I guess You had to try, as it would be hard to sleep without that try, but, I know the result before the experiment... As I told before, the friction will be so big that the wheel will not turn. The pivots have to be thin and polished - the bigger the number of the wheel (2th, 3gh, 4th...), the thinner the pivot. What You are trying to do is possible, but forming the new thin pivot must be done on lathe. Thus the wheel will get shorter, but can have new pivot without the drilling for normal standard repivoting. Then piece of brass can be soldered under the pivot hole in the bridge and new hole drilled in it to form the new bearing.  Well, this way is not the recommended one, not quite correct, but it is possible to do for the excersize... When I say lathe, lathe may be verry simple, someting like turns, but made of what one has in reach of his hands. If You want to try, I will try to guide
    • yes by all means let's gather up our weapons tar feathers find the nearest tree in case Mark is not agreeable to our terms on our demands and storm his Castle. I don't quite understand what you're trying to do here? In other words you want Mark to somehow guarantee that the group will live on forever no matter what? You want Mark to somehow change his business model of what is trying to do or should we just take the group away from him? oh and is quite possible that Mark never realized that his discussion group would take on a life of its own. That the members of the group would like to continue on forever.  
    • I'm not sentimental, I see it this way.  I inherit something I  don't like, I could sell it, buy something I do like and remember the person with the new item.  For example, I  inherit a watch ( I haven't), I don't like it, I  buy a watch I do like, every time I look at the watch, I think of the person. 
    • A lot of it has to do with a generations attitude.  Have we reached a generation of folk yet that have no sentimental values ie. Just an object to sell . I expect my kids will sell my collection , maybe keep one valued piece. Not being in the game very long, i have no idea when the sale of old watches boomed or if it has even reached its peak yet. If we go back 20 years what were ebay sales like then, expense wise and volume ?
×
×
  • Create New...