Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I will post a review in due course, but this week I've been so busy I haven't had time to play to much with it.

  • Like 1
Posted

This week I took delivery of a www.brunelmicroscopes.co.uk BM1 long arm microscope. Several of you where interested in this & how I got on so I thought I'd do a review. bear in mind its written after only a couple of uses, by someone who has a few years experience on quartz but only 6 months experience on mechanical watches.

 

post-138-0-25040500-1396615350_thumb.jpg

Image from brunelmicroscopes

 

Cost (including post & vat at time of writing) £219.60

 

First impressions where pretty good, for a couple of hundred pounds you get a well made, heavy & positive feeling microscope. you get a nice cover & some additional madnifications

post-138-0-85144300-1396615306_thumb.jpg

post-138-0-94588500-1396615479_thumb.jpg

 

You can adjust the eye lenses to suit your eyes & adjust the long arm in various directions.

post-138-0-89810800-1396615583_thumb.jpg

post-138-0-64622400-1396615618_thumb.jpg

post-138-0-99264400-1396616071_thumb.jpg

 

I found three faults with the microscope, the first is if you swing the arm by 90 degrees the base is not weighty enough to support it & the unit tips over

post-138-0-03772900-1396615723_thumb.jpg

 

this means you have to pretty much use it directly inline with the base which gives a more limited space under which to work, especially if you adjust the eyes to suit a seated position, although once I got going I didn't notice it, it was enough.

post-138-0-47060600-1396615809_thumb.jpg

 

The second issues was the light got pretty hot & it didn't half make me jump when I touched the back of my hand on it, which being made to jump when your talking watches isn't the greatest of news is it! but I think this is only a matter of getting used to it as a set up

 

The third issue was the quality of the lenses as you can see they look quite cheap & Chinese nasty & I'd like to have perhaps had something to put them in to keep the dust out of them.

post-138-0-08520600-1396615997_thumb.jpg

 

To work with the microscope is a joy! I mean a serious joy! my hand was a lot steadier, things where more precise. changing lense is a simple case of sliding one out & sliding the next in

post-138-0-41063100-1396616162_thumb.jpg

 

I found with the angle i'd set the eye lenses to gave me about 10cm of work space, which was more than enough, I didn't foul with the microscope at all.

post-138-0-52869800-1396616416_thumb.jpg

 

the first job I did with the microscope was to change a date when on a 255.411 from the white it was supplied with to a gold one from the watch I was repairing & I have to say I have never found doing a piece of work on a watch so pleasing.

the preciseness

post-138-0-41602300-1396616320_thumb.jpg

 

So all in all, as a user you can see & feel this is an entry level stereo longarm microscope, but its still a long, long was out in front of an eyeglass/loupe and is a sound investment for an intermediate user & I would throughly recommend one at this price

 

I'd give it about 7.5 out of 10.

 

Lee

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thanks for the review Lee - most informative :)

 

In fact - the problems you pointed out all seem solvable and even forgivable given the price which is excellent.

 

Maybe the lamp will accept an LED bulb which will run cooler?

 

 

Do they have an attachment available to video through it?

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

Thanks for the review Lee,  it is a lot of instrument for the money.  Velcro tape glued to the microscope base and bench should be enough to stop it tipping over and can always be removed if your not happy with it,  unlike drilling holes in the base and workbench.  As Mark said an LED bulb might solve the heat problem if you can find one to fit.

Edited by autowind
  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks for the critique Lee, very well described and excellent photos. I greatly appreciate you taking the time to do a proper job.

Posted

I will tinker with it in the coming weeks to get it right for my personal preference  & I totally agree the problems all seem solvable and are forgivable its an excellent bit of kit for the price.

Posted

Thank you for the thorough review. I have an old gem scope that I can examine things with but it isn't useable on the bench. This looks like it will do the trick. There are also a few models on the bay that have the third eye for a USB camera. I just wonder about the quality. Thanks again!

Posted

Lee, I am anxious to hear feedback on your stereo microscope. I use a standard microscope all day for my real job. I am a clinical scientist and I think this would be an easy transition for me. I normally use magnification along the line of 400 - 1000 x's so a bit different but still much the same.

Odyseus, where do I find your blog?

Thank you,

Alec

Posted

Lee, I am anxious to hear feedback on your stereo microscope. I use a standard microscope all day for my real job. I am a clinical scientist and I think this would be an easy transition for me. I normally use magnification along the line of 400 - 1000 x's so a bit different but still much the same.

Odyseus, where do I find your blog?

Thank you,

Alec

So sorry just now saw the review. Thank you for that! I was thinking a diving lead weight might solve the tipping issue as well. I think I might want the base out of the way.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I have one of these trinocular stereo microscopes, the version with a double bar stand and big heavy weighted base.

Three adapters that take it upto 90x mag (which is way more than any watchmaking task would require I suspect) but it's great for just playing around and looking at interesting things.

The working distance on mine is about 20cm at a decent mag.

Mine came with a fluorescent illumination which is a pile of poo, it's that dim it's been binned and replaced with an LED one which is nice and bright.

One thing that really annoys me is the third optical port for USB cameras, DSLR cameras, etc.

Attaching either of my Nikon cameras to it (D200 or D300s) and the images are extremely washed out with terrible chromatic aberration, extremely poor DoF. Just unusable.

Doesn't matter what I put on there, you would think the image or video was taken with a £10 webcam hand held down an eyepiece.

I had intended to hook up the DSLR camera and a Hi8 camcorder to video the disassembly, mainly so I could put it back together again, but also to show people what needs to be done if I ever get to the point if an start offering my services.

Has anyone had any luck with a camera kit for these heads? The one I got is all metal construction with the DSLR adapter for Nikon series cameras. I've tried all sorts of combinations of the adapter in the black metal port of the third head, removing the black metal port and fitting it (loosely) into the beige throat of the third port - this is obviously lose to wobble side to side but can give me an ok image, I suspect it's just made with very poor tolerances.

The image through the eyepieces is very good (a little chromatic aberration at high magnification but nothing too bad)

Posted

Oh, one thing I found out is that after building my workbench with the height set for comfortable height for me, using the scope I need to be up about another foot and a half! The 20cm working distance + the same again height of the scope head! Solved by lots of cushions on the chair :)

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Almost the same as the one I have, which is this one:-

http://www.ebay.com/itm/191173262207

 

I would recomment getting this one if you can as the dual horizontal bars give better support and the base is a lot heavier.

 

It does have two problems, first the fluorescent light is pathetic, nowhere near bright enough so search for another identical one that comes with an LED light which is far brighter. Second if you try to take pictures through it using the DSLR camera adapter, the pictures on mine come out really poor.

 

As I bought mine primarily to work through, and taking lovely pictures of random things and bugs really close up was a secondary consideration, I'm still happy with mine.

 

I have heard that if you buy the right (dedicated) camera you can get excellent pictures, but the cameras ain't cheap!

Posted

Thanks for the response fraggle. I saw that one as well but wondered if it would be overkill or too big for my bench. Are you happy with the scope you purchased other than the two flaws you pointed out? Is it easy to use?

What type of light did you end up using. I see goose neck fiber optic lights also being offered but those seem very expensive.

Also, did you try the USB cameras they sell? Was wondering about their quality. Thanks again for the help.

Posted

Yes I'm very happy with it.

 

There are a few things you need to take into account with the one I have and the one you linked too.

 

If you want to use them when they are fully extended horizontally you'll need to figure out some way of bolting the base to the desk - it's just not heavy enough to support the scope properly.

 

I've got mine extended about half way and that's great.

 

They do take up a lot of room, and if you have it extended half way horizontally like mine it needs room behind it too so you can swing it around.

 

So you'll need to think of accounting for enough room on the table for the base, and enough room behind and infront to allow the arm with the scope on the end of the arm to swing over your work area and swing back out of the way.

 

Saying that, the scope head is obviously suspended above the workbench so having space that it can swing in (in front of the base) isn't a problem, and once I'd assembled it on my workbench it doesn't take up very much bench real estate at all.

 

My model has a large amount of "working room" between the bottom of the scope and whatever you are looking at, that is great as it gives me plenty of room to work on whatever I'm fixing, but the downside it that the eyepieces are high up and I have to put about 3 cushions on the chair to sit on so I can comfortably use it.

 

So, yeah, a couple of things to bear in mind when you're deciding how to lay out your bench, grab a few cushions or get a chair with adjustable height that goes very high and you'll love it :)

 

I haven't tried any of the cameras that they sell for it no. I bought the adapter kit for DSLR cameras (as I've got those already). The DSLR kit seems very well made, all metal, but I think the tolerances on it aren't that great and it allows the camera to move a little, which is enough to make the image look bad.

 

I haven't heard of anyone using the cameras that are made for it, so I don't know if they're worthwhile buying.

 

The lamp I got looks very similar to the one in the auction I linked too, but it uses LEDs rather than a fluorescent tube and is a lot brighter. I got it from EBay, search for "144-LED Adjustable MICROSCOPE Ring Light illuminator Lamp".

Posted

Thanks again for the comprehensive reply Fraggle.  I do appreciate it.  I would maybe have to clear some room on my bench when it is in use but I don't see that as a problem.  I also have an adjustable chair that I can use as long as my legs still fit under the bench :)  I am going to pull the trigger and add the led light.  Thanks again for the help!!!

Posted

My pleasure.

 

I don't know where you live? That seller uses EBay shipping which (for me in the UK) automatically charges the customs import duty and VAT which added a bit to the price.

 

Still a lot cheaper than the equivalent from well known brands so that wasn't a problem for me - the full price was advertised in the EBay auction, nothing extra to pay.

 

If you go for one of the USB cameras do let us know how you get on with it.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

@ Lee:

 

Hello!

Great summary! Could we have some pictures with what it's like through the lens? Try with a phone camera at least :) 

 

Thank you!

Bogdan

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi, this is the first place I found when looking for advice so I hope someone could advise me.  Im completely new to touching watches but I’ve always wondered how they work.  I’ve bought a cheap movement, an ETA replica to take apart and rebuild.  Im thinking I’ll need some screwdrivers, tweezers, movement holder and a loop? My goal is just to have a go first and see if I enjoy it enough before buying more tools.  Do I buy cheap tools for now and get better quality tools later if I enjoy it like I think I will? or will the cheap tools be a pain and take some of the fun out of it?  With quality tools being relatively expensive I’m unsure what to buy.    Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
    • Yeah I have seen 44-56 documented for Elgin 18 size elsewhere. I have the style of gauge that's like a set of feeler gauges and I never noticed before today it is faintly stamped "Elgin". Pictured is the way I have been measuring. I am going to go to a larger jewel than the 42 that had been in there. I recently won an auction on a big set of Fitrite jewels all in the little bottles, to discover that the what's actually in the bottles bears no relation to the chart of sizes printed on the box. In most cases it seems to be all mixed so in fact I have about 24 little bottles and thousands of assorted jewels of all diameters and lengths, which is better than nothing. But since I don't have a micrometer with a table, measuring for the exact diameter will be a big job. Instead I will test a lot of them in the fork slot the same way I measure with the gauge. But this is still the next thing. I have to get the escapement to unlock first.
    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
×
×
  • Create New...