Jump to content

A friend wants to sell me this Vostok


Recommended Posts

Here is similar watch on ebay.

I am posting pictures of the actual watch.  I dont think it has ever been worn.  Ex husband bought it and I guess it went into a drawer.

Thoughts on this brand of Soviet watch?  I have wanted a CCCP watch for awhile, but have not spent the time to do the research.

 

image.png.0f8cb0fe2c83a4aaadde22de018cffc4.pngimage.png.6aa169d3e0d757ca9f1f7ca2b2fee900.pngimage.png.50397c75dbe7e357f14739e4b172a26d.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi looks clean enough, most Russian watches are not finely finished but are usually robust,  is the watch a worker or not . If it’s been in a drawer for some time it would benefit from a service for sure. Oil dries up and dirt does find a way in also the mainspring if been left fully wound and not able to run most likely dry or mane set.  Try it for winding and running for say 24 hrs if you can

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a Vostok Komandirskie. The problem is that they are worth about $20 to $50. Your friend might get insulted if you offered so little.

The lugs are quite close together at 18mm, making the strap seem skinny for a diver's style watch. I use a 22mm strap and cut off 2mm off each side to make it look more proportional. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

 Russian watches are junk, your friend must have discovered this fact.

 

 

I love my Russian watches. The Vostok Amphibia and Komandirskie... maybe not so much. 

They are rough but robust. Can take a lot of abuse, unlike my Swiss Army watch which uses a quartz movement and just dies sitting on the shelf.

It's like an AK47 compared to a M16.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

 most Russian watches are not finely finished 

How would you rate an escape wheel thats not finely finished or compare to some modern Swiss that can run without lubrication.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

I love my Russian watches. The Vostok Amphibia and Komandirskie... maybe not so much. 

They are rough but robust. Can take a lot of abuse, unlike my Swiss Army watch which uses a quartz movement and just dies sitting on the shelf.

It's like an AK47 compared to a M16.

Massey ferguson tractors are more robust. 

Open a Audmars piguet to see what a fine watch is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bought some of these watches new in the 1990s for about 10DM (Deutschmark) each.

They are constructed well but (very) poorly machined and finished, as others said already.

I sold these watches some years ago for about €20,- each. Should have been waiting for better times 😆

Edited by Kalanag
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi @LittleWatchShop getting the unvarnished truth out of a forum such as this is like getting blood from a stone.  You will get many diverse opinions, that’s what forums do  , extract opinions and from the result you then assemble your own data.     By the way Massey Ferguson aren’t any better than most tractors, stick to John Deere or AlisChalmers.   Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Sometimes, I worry that I will not get the unvarnished truth on this forum.

One should be careful not to confuse the "unvarnished truth" with simple opinion based on an individuals personal experience (which can be base on as little as just 1 watch), preferences, and prejudices.

I like Russian watches (and I have serviced and repaired many) but they do have their faults.

Movement wise the designs range from direct copies, licensed or otherwise, of Swiss movements, to some highly innovative in house designs. Build quality can be somewhat variable, if you get a good one then fine, but if you're up for a bit of fettling then even the less that fantastic can be brought to acceptable levels of performance. The quality of finish ranges from quite acceptable to what can only be described as "agricultural", so the Massey Ferguson references have some grounding.

A lot of the 1970's and 1980's watches came in cases that had absolutely no water resistance, or even dust protection what so ever, so the movements often suffered from corrosion issues. The cases were generally chrome or gold plated base metal, and would wear through to the brass quite quickly. However the full stainless steel cases with a screw down back and a water proof crown were not too bad, and the Amphibia divers are pretty good.

12 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Open a Audmars piguet to see what a fine watch is.

This is of course a completely pointless comparison, you're not going to get high end Swiss watch levels of performance or finish from any budget watch where ever it comes from, but so long as you keep in mind that that is what most Russian watches are (budget), you shouldn't be disappointed. I don't know about current prices but it was only a handful of years ago that Vostok Amphibias could be had brand new for as little as £75 including shipping, find me an AP at that price point...

As @HectorLooi says

12 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

That's a Vostok Komandirskie

and it's a nice clean example, looks like a late '70's or early '80's vintage with a fairly well finished movement. The case is chrome plated brass rather than stainless steel but the chrome is in good order.The case back gasket appears to be missing but get that sorted and it should have reasonable water resistance. At the right price (I wouldn't pay more than £40) it should be a fun introduction to Russian watches, and of course provides you with the the opportunity to start to formulate your own "unvarnished truth" about them. It also opens up a whole world of customisation should you wish to personalise it.

Well worth reading if you're interested in these...

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/vostok-watches-history-explained-muhammed-amjad

https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/vostok-amphibia

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Marc said:

One should be careful not to confuse the "unvarnished truth" with simple opinion based on an individuals personal experience (which can be base on as little as just 1 watch), preferences, and prejudices.

I like Russian watches (and I have serviced and repaired many) but they do have their faults.

Movement wise the designs range from direct copies, licensed or otherwise, of Swiss movements, to some highly innovative in house designs. Build quality can be somewhat variable, if you get a good one then fine, but if you're up for a bit of fettling then even the less that fantastic can be brought to acceptable levels of performance. The quality of finish ranges from quite acceptable to what can only be described as "agricultural", so the Massey Ferguson references have some grounding.

A lot of the 1970's and 1980's watches came in cases that had absolutely no water resistance, or even dust protection what so ever, so the movements often suffered from corrosion issues. The cases were generally chrome or gold plated base metal, and would wear through to the brass quite quickly. However the full stainless steel cases with a screw down back and a water proof crown were not too bad, and the Amphibia divers are pretty good.

This is of course a completely pointless comparison, you're not going to get high end Swiss watch levels of performance or finish from any budget watch where ever it comes from, but so long as you keep in mind that that is what most Russian watches are (budget), you shouldn't be disappointed. I don't know about current prices but it was only a handful of years ago that Vostok Amphibias could be had brand new for as little as £75 including shipping, find me an AP at that price point...

As @HectorLooi says

and it's a nice clean example, looks like a late '70's or early '80's vintage with a fairly well finished movement. The case is chrome plated brass rather than stainless steel but the chrome is in good order.The case back gasket appears to be missing but get that sorted and it should have reasonable water resistance. At the right price (I wouldn't pay more than £40) it should be a fun introduction to Russian watches, and of course provides you with the the opportunity to start to formulate your own "unvarnished truth" about them. It also opens up a whole world of customisation should you wish to personalise it.

Well worth reading if you're interested in these...

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/vostok-watches-history-explained-muhammed-amjad

https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/vostok-amphibia

 

 

A good comprehensive opinion of Russian watches. I have something of an affection for them being the first watch i repaired was Russian which runs for almost 48 hours, with great time keeping on the wrist. I also have a few of the Vostok amphibias, known as scuba dudes although that logo is often seen on other divers. One is modded and lovely to look at, the wobbly crowns are a unique feature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I have wanted a CCCP watch for awhile, but have not spent the time to do the research.

It's a AKA3 MO CCCP. Initially only for sale for the military or Westerners with US$. Seems a nice and clean watch. There is nothing wrong with these watches, provided they are not already tinkered to death. But this one seems in good & nice condition.

I've always said, and will say it again; especially the Vostok Amphibia is the best value for money (or for the US: "the most bang for the buck") you can buy on this planet. Nothing comes even remotely close.

Go for it 😉

 

Please note, this is the Amphibia 200mtr diver, not a Komandirskie. The Swiss could learn a thing or two from the Soviets / Russians.

 

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think of Vostok as the Timex of Russian watches. They take a licking ... you know the rest. They also produce some incredibly "budget minded" (aka cheap) watches, as well as some very decent timepieces with a long interesting horological history.


I have three Russian watches in my collection. A Vostok "scuba dude" just because it's cheap, quirky and fun. It's the VW Beetle of watches. A made-for-the-western-market Amfibia (spelled with a f instead of ph) that's a typical Vostok calibre with a bit more  finish on the case and dial. And a reissue of the Strela chronograph, the Russian version of the Omega moon watch.

image.thumb.png.7a5099faa639f99e7e2647112afe3d98.png 

 

Watches are like wine -- you can get good wine cheaply and some expensive bottles are pure vinegar. Don't let anyone tell you you're wrong for liking bulk wine in a box. And, that doesn't mean you can't appreciate a good vintage bottle from a well known cellar.

 

My opinion + $5 will get you a small regular coffee at Starbucks if you have a coupon.

Edited by eccentric59
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 1991 I bought a brand new Russian wrist alarm watch „Corsar“ for just 50DM (€25) from a department store in Stuttgart.

My initial excitement vanished immediately when I found, that the alarm spring could not be wound correctly. After opening the watch I found a ratchetwheel with the squared hole stamped about 0,5mm off center. So the ratchet wheel lost engagement with the crown wheel every turn. Hard to be fixed…

Unfortunately this was the one and only Russian alarm watch in the store.

The movement was a SU 2612,1 which is a copy of the AS 1930.

IMG_5695.jpeg.668b4d977533e670ccb096b9c8fa6065.jpeg

Edited by Kalanag
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Kalanag said:

found a ratchetwheel with the squared hole stamped about 0,5mm off center. So the ratchet wheel lost engagement with the crown wheel every turn. Hard to be fixed…

We had this a few months ago with another Russian watch, it turned out the rachet wheel could only be fitted one way on the arbor square. There was a 1 in 4 chance of placing the wheel correctly first time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With something like this a gasket seal for instance if i cant find the relevant information i would use instinct to decide what fits and works best. You have the original gasket ( well maybe its original or hopefully it is )so its fairly easy to determine what material to use. Shape , for that i would look at the gasket seatings, are there grooves or recesses in either the case back or case or both, what shape are the grooves, flat or round etc, how does the gasket sit and behave in those seatings. Next thickness,that is going to be a bit of a guess, especially if the gasket is a soft one that has been heavily compressed over time. This is where a selection is going to come in handy, personally i would be choosing one that is giving me the feel of compression as its coming into contact with both of the mating surfaces. But not so much that the gasket is going to squash out and become distorted, again this is guesswork and feel is required with the allowance of compression over time, something you may want to check after six months. This part is a little moot as without a pressure test, good water resistance is not assured so the watch needs to treated as such and not as if it were a new diving watch ( not that i would treat any new diving watch as if were ). What you want to expect from your efforts is a little accidental rain catch, if you want more water resistance guarantee then a professional gasket replacement and pressure test is what you should be seeking which will be more than the value of this watch. Coincidentally i have the same watch, been searching for a stem for it for a while now. 
    • It might not be a hook it might be something like this. But still the mainspring is catching on something on the slip ring because it doesn't have its own outer slipping part like the modern ones. The image below came from some vintage Omega thing I'll have to see if I can find where that has gone to.documentation A different book has this          
    • I did not see a hook on the slip ring. I will check again tomorrow.
    • I think I'm having a confusion here? You would apply the breaking grease to the inside of the barrel then the slip ring would go inside. Then the mainspring goes in and it catches on the hook on the slip ring.
    • Thank you for the once again very thorough and informative reply. I'm sure at this point it's academic, but I'm always curious to know best practices. This then implies that If I'm planning to reuse the old mainspring (which I am), I should also reinstall the slip ring. I will do that and apply braking grease to the inside of the slip ring as if it were the barrel. This makes the most sense to me. Also, that bit about the center cannon pinion is very helpful. That wasn't in the tech sheet I have (attached) dated 1970. Omega 1001(1).pdf
×
×
  • Create New...