Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

It is one piece.  The picture shows two orthogonal views.

Ah. Thank you. Been trying for an hour now. Can only move it by hard tweezer pressure. I will get there.

Ross

Posted

Did it. Did it. Did it. Finally got the Setting Lever lose. Phew! Next. NuceJoe's Coca-Cola clean. 

I know I'm excited. But hey. It's my fist ever dissemble in a proper manner.

Ross

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

I've a long way to go. However I have, in my opinion achieved a milestone. I've dissemble part of a watch and cleaned the rusty parts with an ultrasonic cleaner.  Next will be the oil an re-assembly. 

The youtube videos from members and others is a great boon in learning. 

Ross

Edited by rossjackson01
grammar
Posted

  There should be a datasheet online  for this caliber or a schematic diagram, wouldn't hurt to have in additjon to the pix you have taken, I can show where every parts goes, but datasheet is best to follow for oiling.

You can't oveclean the parts specically reversers, fork, escape,and balance.

You didn't put the fork or balance in ultrasonic, did you?  if you did, best is to check if any shellac is lost.

Regards 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Nucejoe said:

You didn't put the fork or balance in ultrasonic, did you?  if you did, best is to check if any shellac is lost.

Once again..  correct use of ultrasonic cleaners and related fluisce does not damage shellac.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
16 hours ago, jdm said:

Once again..  correct use of ultrasonic cleaners and related fluisce does not damage shellac.

OP is a hobbiest and new to watchrepair, nothing like a professional repair shop, so name is a cleaning solution that suits him.

Regs

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
19 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

You didn't put the fork or balance in ultrasonic, did you?  if you did, best is to check if any shellac is lost

Being a relatively modern movement (1976-1980), I would expect the impulse jewel to be friction fitted rather than fixed with shellac(?), so we shouldn't have to worry about the balance. The fork is, of course, another matter.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, VWatchie said:

Being a relatively modern movement (1976-1980), I would expect the impulse jewel to be friction fitted rather than fixed with shellac(?), so we shouldn't have to worry about the balance. The fork is, of course, another matter.

Hi VWatchie, thanks for enlightening me, had noticed not loosing modern impulse jewel in ultrasonic, didn't know the reason. 

Regards

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

OP is a hobbiest and new to watchrepair, nothing like a professional repair shop, so name is a cleaning solution that suits him.

There below our pinned, all-levels covered, comprehensive topic on the subject:

 

Posted

I did not put the shellac items in the ultrasonic. I have to say, it worked a treat on the setting lever. Used lighter fluid. 

Found the problem with the movement. The gear on the escapement wheel does not contact the teeth on the 2nd wheel? Screwing down the bridge draws the escapement away from the 2nd wheel. Hmm. Been at it all afternoon. 

Ross

Posted
41 minutes ago, rossjackson01 said:

 

Found the problem with the movement. The gear on the escapement wheel does not contact the teeth on the 2nd wheel? Screwing down the bridge draws the escapement away from the 2nd wheel. Hmm. Been at it all afternoon. 

 

Are you sure pivot are correct and in holes?     Could be a bent pivot. Do gears in the train turn effortlessly? 

Check the side shake on pivots you say move apart, you grab each arbour in your tweezers and shake it from side to side , should feel no noticable side shake. 

Are you set up to show a vid of what gears moving apart?

 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Nucejoe said:

Are you sure pivot are correct and in holes?     Could be a bent pivot. Do gears in the train turn effortlessly? 

Yes. All move effortless when the bridge is off. All pivots site into gems when bridge placed. All moves correctly. Bridge tightened and balance is then aligned off (away) from Centre wheel. When bridge fully tight (not massively) then all pivots seize. 

Don't know how to make a video. Only have an android phone. Hence stills. Will take some photographs and post tomorrow. My head hurts now.

Good fun though. 

Ross

Edited by rossjackson01
more information
Posted
8 hours ago, rossjackson01 said:

 Bridge tightened and balance is then aligned off (away) from Centre wheel. When bridge fully tight (not massively) then all pivots seize. 

I can't correctly understand you, locating pins are there to align the cock/ bridges, sounds like defective/ loose/ missing locating pins. 

 

8 hours ago, rossjackson01 said:

 When bridge fully tight (not massively) then all pivots seize. 

One possible cause is bent bridge, which lowers all jewels. 

 

Posted
9 hours ago, rossjackson01 said:

Bridge tightened and balance is then aligned off (away) from Centre wheel.

I think you mean escape wheel, not balance.

 

9 hours ago, rossjackson01 said:

When bridge fully tight (not massively) then all pivots seize. 

It is normal for beginners to have major trouble fitting all pivots under the main bridge, especially the escape wheel. You can try fitting one wheel at the time to identify which one seizes. If you have fully tightened the bridge with a pivot out, it may have bent, and all bets are off. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Hi Ross  at this point in the proceedings I tend to agree with jdm's conclusion. The thing to do is to remove the bridge and the wheels, including the balance and fork/pallet  . Then check each wheels pivots for being bent/broken. If they ckeck out ok then fit one at a time checking its seated in the lower jewel then fit the bridge loosely  Then fit a couple of bridge screws loosely to prevent the bridge from moving about but not screwed down. Then manipulate all the wheels into place checking that the end shake is good and the up/ movement is free. When all wheels are in their locations and before screwing down the bridge further check the up/down (end shake) on each wheel. When tightening the screws down do it a degree at a time constantly checking the shake and free dom untill the bridge is seated but not finaly screwed down. At this point check the rotation on the train. Then and oly then tighten the bridge.

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, rossjackson01 said:

then all pivots seize. 

I think you meant the gear train seizes, when a gear does sieze it will keep the entire train from turning, in such a case,  you should  see end shake on some pivots thence  identify the seized one, so there is no need to instal and  test each gear seperately. Shouldn't unneccessarily toy with a movement/part .

Regs

Posted

Hi  The reasoning behind testing  each wheel is as the plate has been screwed down there mat be a sightly deformed pivot and checking esch individual wheel in its jewels you will be able to locate any duff pivot or a wheel not running flat. It is easier to check the individual rather than the whole. Its a londrawn out method but in the end you are assured that either something is off /broken or running ok. Its just being confident in you diagnosis.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, watchweasol said:

 It is easier to check the individual rather than the whole.

Indeed. The other day I had a Seiko train strangely seizing and the reason why it did became apparent only when I tested the 4th wheel (center seconds) alone. Reason was that the upper jewel had moved down a tiny bit due to a shock.

Watchmaking It's all about reasoning, inspecting, testing, and even fight gremlins. A procedure that is in the book may prove inconvenient, or you may happen to get things working by sheer luck. In the end, it's the result that counts.
 

  • Like 1
Posted

 I gradually loosen bridge screws until the train unseize, then turn gears and see if any is not flat.... etc. 

As we disassemble we have a chance to check if the thing does what its suppose to do. 

Regs Joe the 🧐

 

Posted

Good to read all the comments.

I place each wheel in the appropriate gems. Each seats ok. None appear bent. Each rotates. The alignment of the balance wheel place the head (cog) away from the Centre wheel. When the Bridge is place, the balance wheel is in the same position, away from the Centre wheel. No cog contact. Photographs attached.

20220302_153558.jpg

20220302_153617.jpg


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
×
×
  • Create New...