Jump to content

ETA 2789-1


Recommended Posts

I've a long way to go. However I have, in my opinion achieved a milestone. I've dissemble part of a watch and cleaned the rusty parts with an ultrasonic cleaner.  Next will be the oil an re-assembly. 

The youtube videos from members and others is a great boon in learning. 

Ross

Edited by rossjackson01
grammar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  There should be a datasheet online  for this caliber or a schematic diagram, wouldn't hurt to have in additjon to the pix you have taken, I can show where every parts goes, but datasheet is best to follow for oiling.

You can't oveclean the parts specically reversers, fork, escape,and balance.

You didn't put the fork or balance in ultrasonic, did you?  if you did, best is to check if any shellac is lost.

Regards 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nucejoe said:

You didn't put the fork or balance in ultrasonic, did you?  if you did, best is to check if any shellac is lost.

Once again..  correct use of ultrasonic cleaners and related fluisce does not damage shellac.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, jdm said:

Once again..  correct use of ultrasonic cleaners and related fluisce does not damage shellac.

OP is a hobbiest and new to watchrepair, nothing like a professional repair shop, so name is a cleaning solution that suits him.

Regs

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

You didn't put the fork or balance in ultrasonic, did you?  if you did, best is to check if any shellac is lost

Being a relatively modern movement (1976-1980), I would expect the impulse jewel to be friction fitted rather than fixed with shellac(?), so we shouldn't have to worry about the balance. The fork is, of course, another matter.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, VWatchie said:

Being a relatively modern movement (1976-1980), I would expect the impulse jewel to be friction fitted rather than fixed with shellac(?), so we shouldn't have to worry about the balance. The fork is, of course, another matter.

Hi VWatchie, thanks for enlightening me, had noticed not loosing modern impulse jewel in ultrasonic, didn't know the reason. 

Regards

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

OP is a hobbiest and new to watchrepair, nothing like a professional repair shop, so name is a cleaning solution that suits him.

There below our pinned, all-levels covered, comprehensive topic on the subject:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did not put the shellac items in the ultrasonic. I have to say, it worked a treat on the setting lever. Used lighter fluid. 

Found the problem with the movement. The gear on the escapement wheel does not contact the teeth on the 2nd wheel? Screwing down the bridge draws the escapement away from the 2nd wheel. Hmm. Been at it all afternoon. 

Ross

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, rossjackson01 said:

 

Found the problem with the movement. The gear on the escapement wheel does not contact the teeth on the 2nd wheel? Screwing down the bridge draws the escapement away from the 2nd wheel. Hmm. Been at it all afternoon. 

 

Are you sure pivot are correct and in holes?     Could be a bent pivot. Do gears in the train turn effortlessly? 

Check the side shake on pivots you say move apart, you grab each arbour in your tweezers and shake it from side to side , should feel no noticable side shake. 

Are you set up to show a vid of what gears moving apart?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nucejoe said:

Are you sure pivot are correct and in holes?     Could be a bent pivot. Do gears in the train turn effortlessly? 

Yes. All move effortless when the bridge is off. All pivots site into gems when bridge placed. All moves correctly. Bridge tightened and balance is then aligned off (away) from Centre wheel. When bridge fully tight (not massively) then all pivots seize. 

Don't know how to make a video. Only have an android phone. Hence stills. Will take some photographs and post tomorrow. My head hurts now.

Good fun though. 

Ross

Edited by rossjackson01
more information
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, rossjackson01 said:

 Bridge tightened and balance is then aligned off (away) from Centre wheel. When bridge fully tight (not massively) then all pivots seize. 

I can't correctly understand you, locating pins are there to align the cock/ bridges, sounds like defective/ loose/ missing locating pins. 

 

8 hours ago, rossjackson01 said:

 When bridge fully tight (not massively) then all pivots seize. 

One possible cause is bent bridge, which lowers all jewels. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, rossjackson01 said:

Bridge tightened and balance is then aligned off (away) from Centre wheel.

I think you mean escape wheel, not balance.

 

9 hours ago, rossjackson01 said:

When bridge fully tight (not massively) then all pivots seize. 

It is normal for beginners to have major trouble fitting all pivots under the main bridge, especially the escape wheel. You can try fitting one wheel at the time to identify which one seizes. If you have fully tightened the bridge with a pivot out, it may have bent, and all bets are off. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Ross  at this point in the proceedings I tend to agree with jdm's conclusion. The thing to do is to remove the bridge and the wheels, including the balance and fork/pallet  . Then check each wheels pivots for being bent/broken. If they ckeck out ok then fit one at a time checking its seated in the lower jewel then fit the bridge loosely  Then fit a couple of bridge screws loosely to prevent the bridge from moving about but not screwed down. Then manipulate all the wheels into place checking that the end shake is good and the up/ movement is free. When all wheels are in their locations and before screwing down the bridge further check the up/down (end shake) on each wheel. When tightening the screws down do it a degree at a time constantly checking the shake and free dom untill the bridge is seated but not finaly screwed down. At this point check the rotation on the train. Then and oly then tighten the bridge.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, rossjackson01 said:

then all pivots seize. 

I think you meant the gear train seizes, when a gear does sieze it will keep the entire train from turning, in such a case,  you should  see end shake on some pivots thence  identify the seized one, so there is no need to instal and  test each gear seperately. Shouldn't unneccessarily toy with a movement/part .

Regs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi  The reasoning behind testing  each wheel is as the plate has been screwed down there mat be a sightly deformed pivot and checking esch individual wheel in its jewels you will be able to locate any duff pivot or a wheel not running flat. It is easier to check the individual rather than the whole. Its a londrawn out method but in the end you are assured that either something is off /broken or running ok. Its just being confident in you diagnosis.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, watchweasol said:

 It is easier to check the individual rather than the whole.

Indeed. The other day I had a Seiko train strangely seizing and the reason why it did became apparent only when I tested the 4th wheel (center seconds) alone. Reason was that the upper jewel had moved down a tiny bit due to a shock.

Watchmaking It's all about reasoning, inspecting, testing, and even fight gremlins. A procedure that is in the book may prove inconvenient, or you may happen to get things working by sheer luck. In the end, it's the result that counts.
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I gradually loosen bridge screws until the train unseize, then turn gears and see if any is not flat.... etc. 

As we disassemble we have a chance to check if the thing does what its suppose to do. 

Regs Joe the 🧐

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good to read all the comments.

I place each wheel in the appropriate gems. Each seats ok. None appear bent. Each rotates. The alignment of the balance wheel place the head (cog) away from the Centre wheel. When the Bridge is place, the balance wheel is in the same position, away from the Centre wheel. No cog contact. Photographs attached.

20220302_153558.jpg

20220302_153617.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh nice. I have a similar wedge style stump for my staking tool, so I'll give that a shot. Thanks!
    • Thank you all for the replies!  Very informative! True enough, the Gamsol took some time to evaporate and does leave a residue. So not all naphtha are created equal!  Need to find alternatives then. i was able to try Hexane recommended by Alex and it seems great.  I wonder what the cons are?
    • Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
×
×
  • Create New...