Jump to content

Help identifying pocket watch movement


Recommended Posts

Yes back then as well still now some casers and retailers insisted and maybe paid more to get complety sterile mov.ts. 

Others paid more to have some modifications made to the bridge layout and then apply their markings. 

There were no reliable sources of information outside industry circles and perhaps few precious illustrated parts catalogue.

Buyers were left either buying big names otherwise hanging to the word of the jeweller telling and selling them whatever he wanted.

It was a very competitive and profitable market for a necessary item, the equivalent of a smartphone today. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at cortebert as suggested earlier looks similar but all the ones i have looked at the balance bridge curves to right where's this kinda curves left ?

Thanks oldhippy, I will post photo of keyless work tomorrow, hopefully will shed some light 

Many thanks 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Russian Malnija amd marathon are said to be copied off of cortebert, but Russian put long reference number on their movements, I wonder if anyone else copied this  cortebert design.

Malnija 3602 came in 16 and 18 jewels out of two factory, which furthure complicates things.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, oldhippy said:

Should be able to i d it by the keyless work under the dial. We need to see a photo of the complete keyless work

We need the diameter of the movement measured on the dial side. Then a picture of the dial side. The only minor catch is the bestfit book which is the standard reference to look for these things I have a suspicion favors watches imported into the US and that one was not. In other words there is no import codes on the watch.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillF said:

Have done bit of googling for marks and fond swiss makers marks

The AM triangle - A. Michel

TR in shield - Ebauches trust

Cant fins anything about these though can anyone help ?

Thanks 

Both A-Michel and Adolf shields are brand watchmakers, I wonder if this could be a joint production.

I would focus on A shield .

What do you need the caliber No for, do you need a part? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's still a long shot because of the age but we could use the fingerprint system from the setting parts but we need a size which I don't see? The reason I need a size is because without a size I have to go through each of the sizes looking to see if anything matches. On the other hand how many to look at?

https://blog.esslinger.com/watch-size-ligne-conversion-chart/

The fingerprint system is by size of the movement which is why asked. If this had been a smaller size there would be so many images I wouldn't of wasted my time. Fortunately the setting parts unique enough that I can skim through relatively quickly until I got to 17. You get the pick and choose which one you like the best. If you had the physical bestfit book and I don't know about the PDF I'm assuming they scanned it properly. If you had the physical PDF book than the part would exactly fit on the book. So each one of those should be different you have more than one to choose from. Then it was really helpful you got one of the names right.

fingerprint 17 L.JPG

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, BillF said:

Have looked at them and there appears to be 4 that are the same unfortunately the file downloads as jpg and not to scale so cannot lay over to see sizes :0(

 

Out of curiosity would you just like to have the stem numbers and not know how I came up with them?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, BillF said:

Stem numbers would be great and would be nice to know how you came up with them also as good to learn :0)

I've never actually tried to print the pages in the book to see if the PDF is properly scaled or not. You have to get the setting roof right and you have to have the right size piece of paper. But still we should build a look at your setting parts look at the images see if anything matches. Then the next step would be to look in the book and see if those numbers come up with a stem number. But I can't do that because I am having a hard time reading which one you thought it was no numbers listed so okay let's have you do that step. I snipped out the sections of the book that have the 17 sized watch you'll notice there is actually several stems so it be helpful to know which movement you think it is.

Then of course still the other way to do this is if we knew the size of your old stem? This is because in addition to the book telling you which stem  for your model number it also lets you look up stems by size. Or if there was a confusion you can look up by size and see which one it is.

pocket two.JPG

pocket one.JPG

bestfit stem measurements.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi to Blackminou29–am a collector/ caretaker—good luck to you following your repair course—with hindsight I wish I’d pursued a career in both watchmaker/ jeweler fields—good luck with whatever career passion you engage.   Thank you Watchweasol for posting the amazing TZIllustratedGlossary! Best wishes, Mike
    • yes I noticed the new site and I miss the old site. It's the unfortunate problem of the Internet here today gone tomorrow sometimes some of the stuff gets backed up and sometimes well it does not then the problem with the early Seiko's were there were not necessarily designed for distribution across the planet and as such there is no customer support for them. So trying to find early stuff like technical information or sometimes even parts list for older Seiko is is problematic. But I did find you a you tube video. A quick look he seems to take a heck of a lot of time to actually get to the service single I did not watch all that but it does look like he did disassemble or started to say there's a tiny bit here  
    • RichardHarris123: Hello and welcome from Leeds, England.  I have family all over Australia, went as £10 poms Thanks Richard. Hope you’re able to visit your family here and that they’ve all done well 🙂 My relatives arrived from England in the 1790s transported on the ‘Second & Third Fleets’—a story of timber sailing ships, of convicts and doing well in this huge Country of Australia. When I visited the UK in the 1980s, I was too young to comprehend the depth and breadth of its history…  Best wishes, Mike William Chapman, my 4th great Grandad’s charges, at age 23 read at the Old Bailey; sentenced to 7 years of transportation to Sydney.
    • The whole process and the progress are closely observed, it's hand-driven and very controlled. I can't see the "danger", unless you are watching the TV while doing it. As you could have read, and in this quote "wheel" is the balance-wheel.
    • Have you got the pallet fork installed in the movement when you see the train move when using the setting works? As nevenbekriev said, without the pallet fork to lock the train, the behaviour you are describing is normal. If this is happening with the pallet fork installed, you have a problem in the gear train, it should be immobile when the pallet fork is locking the escape wheel.  The fit of the circlip above the pinions on that wheel is crooked in your pictures, it should sit flat up against the upper pinion as in Marc’s picture.  Hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...