Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Tudor said:

Nice gloves... probably to cover the scars from the last time he tried that trick?

The gloves are very good there made of a rough suede leather and very thick I have a pair for mainspring removal using a Ollie Baker for fusee spring removal the gloves give plenty of grip on the barrel.

Posted

Bl**dy hell PLEASE DO NOT FOLLOW THIS PROCEDURE>> Not only is there a great risk of distorting the spring the loss of an eye is a real possibility. Some of these springs really fly. If you do not have a dedicated spring winder and want to try his method you must have the barrel inside a clear thick plastic bag when undoing and still wear eye protection and gloves etc. 

Posted

I'd like to see him with a  fusee clock spring, first removing it without a winder then trying to get it back in its barrel. If you want to see more of this idiot he has more videos. 

Posted

6805091_Essentialifyouusethismethodtoremoveaspringinthismanner..thumb.jpg.1c5c2db682d2844cf1c63205bee73c04.jpg

I can see nothing wrong with this method providing you adopt suitable safety equipment such as that below. Do not expect the spring to be any good though after and I would recommend obtaining and fitting a new spring. Should you try the method without the shown PPE below  then prior to spring removal  also get a quote to redecorate the room you are in as there is a great possibility that you may splash some red pigment on near wall coverings and furnishings.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

image.png.af80c4b67db280f761b26c4ed9c76c59.png

3:29  Oooooohhh that went silky smoothly, I bet nobody else saw that coming. ? 

I remember doing something similar with an old Hornby clockwork locomotive that no longer worked, when I was a kid (showing my age again).


I undid the four screws holding the thing together and there was a very similar explosion of uncoiling steel with the addition of a few airborne cogs, and a very confused me sitting thinking bloody hell how did they manage to get all that spring in there, and how the heck am I going to get all the bits back in.
 

Speaking of which, how the heck is he hoping to get it all back in? Superglue and a hammer?

AndyHull grabs the popcorn and starts looking for the follow up video.

Edited by AndyHull
Posted
8 hours ago, AndyHull said:

Speaking of which, how the heck is he hoping to get it all back in? Superglue and a hammer?

I don't think superglue existed in those days? ?

Posted

Braver man than I, Gunga Din.  I think I'll use the tools they make for that.  I've had springy things lash out and draw blood on me before.  Never enjoyed it so much that I desired to repeat it. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...