Jump to content

Grand Seiko Dual Impulse Escapement

Tudor
 Share

Recommended Posts

spectre6000 Distinguished Member

spectre6000

Posted
Posted

Definitely different from the coaxial escapement. One of the big issues Daniels had with getting the coaxial ready for mass production was alignment of the two escape wheels (Smith, his protege, addressed this by making a more three dimensional wheel that is indexed during manufacture). This solves that, making it easier to mass produce. It reintroduces some sliding friction though, as the last jewel on the escape pallet is a fairly conventional geometry with a Swiss lever-like impulse face. Not only is that sliding friction itself a bit of a compromise, but the lubrication requirements also reduce the service interval compared to a coaxial, whose oil usage (at least on paper) is mostly for oxidation protection. The low tooth count on the escape wheel is interesting. With 8 teeth at 36000bpm, it's turning pretty fast. I count a total of 5 wheels between the second mainspring barrel and the escape wheel to make that reduction work. The losses added by those two extra wheels aren't super exciting. I'm not sure how the extra amplitude plays out; I've not read too deep on that subject. As I recall, additional amplitude reduces error, but only to a point. I'm not confident enough in that recollection to say anything definitive though.

 

The coaxial escapement eliminated a significant percentage of the Swiss lever's sliding friction losses, did not require any additional wheels and their requisite frictional losses, and managed to dramatically increase the service interval in the process. This dual impulse escapement cuts the sliding friction nearly in half compared to the Swiss lever, but adds back an appreciable percentage of it through the two additional wheels. Further, I wouldn't go so far as to say it doesn't increase the service interval at all, but it wouldn't likely do so by much. The coaxial is a definite improvement, where I feel this is more likely just novel. The asterisk is the amplitude (at least as presented in that animation); maybe a meaningful improvement, maybe not, maybe just an animator who didn't know better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
clockboy Distinguished Member

clockboy

Posted
Posted

I am very impressed with these Grand Seiko's however no parts are available if one lands on your workbench. I had to replace a shock spring on a Rotary watch that was fitted with a Seiko movement but no shock springs are available so I had to modify a shock spring I had in my stock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tudor Distinguished Member

Tudor

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Unfortunately, there's no "free lunch".

But, I have always admired the Seiko and Zenith high-beat movements. I think they're fantastic, and I aspire to own a high-beat El Primero some day...

 

I have a plan to coat a conventional 2824 escape wheel with DLC (diamond-like carbon) which is very slick and of course very hard. This may allow the stones to be run dry, which should free up some losses to oil sticktion on the stones. Of course the escape wheel may then cut into the stones.

I can also have the going train wheels and pinions coated (perhaps pivots too) but I'm not sure of the implications. This (pivot) change may require sapphire bearings rather than ruby. Not sure. But, it too may allow it to be run completely dry, which would not only reduce the drag, but allow a much wider operational range (much lower-arctic and/or space service) without special oils. Maybe.

I don't know enough about the micro-mechanics so I want to base it on a well-known movement with tons of empirical data available. That old 2824 seems like a good choice (although I prefer the 2892-A2). Plus there is the very real possibility of parts loss or damage in the coating process, so something with an easy parts supply also makes sense for this. Maybe a cheap 2824 clone movement would be an even better choice, as I can buy three for the price of one ETA.

Thinking...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nucejoe Distinguished Member

Nucejoe

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Tudor said:

I don’t have any more details. 

I’m guessing it would use two escape wheels based on this illustration. 

Smart design, takes two impulse out of one wheel and three pallets or are there four? Again much like co- axial little run on escape teeth.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jdm Distinguished Member

jdm

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, clockboy said:

I am very impressed with these Grand Seiko's however no parts are available if one lands on your workbench.

Which being honest is very unlikely. Just some Swiss watch owners, Grand Seiko owners actually appreciate the exclusiveness of having their watch sent to the factory for service or repair. 

Quote

I had to replace a shock spring on a Rotary watch that was fitted with a Seiko movement but no shock springs are available so I had to modify a shock spring I had in my stock.

Strange because 7S26, 4R15, 6R15, NH36, NE15 etc shock springs are easily available from Cousins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
clockboy Distinguished Member

clockboy

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, jdm said:

Which being honest is very unlikely. Just some Swiss watch owners, Grand Seiko owners actually appreciate the exclusiveness of having their watch sent to the factory for service or repair. 

Strange because 7S26, 4R15, 6R15, NH36, NE15 etc shock springs are easily available from Cousins.

That is correct but the latest Seiko calibers have unique shock springs. They look like standard shock springs until fitting as they slightly different in size. I did put up a post a while ago with this issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jdm Distinguished Member

jdm

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, clockboy said:

That is correct but the latest Seiko calibers have unique shock springs. They look like standard shock springs until fitting as they slightly different in size. I did put up a post a while ago with this issue.

Topic below? That is a Chinese movement, not a Seiko. For these, one could try the assortment that Cousins sells for the purpose.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • aac58
      Rare Seiko 5actus Watch??!! With a lot🤪🤔😲

      By aac58 · Posted

      This is not rare at all, the dial code and case code don't usually match.
    • Kkramme
      Coil for old Seiko Credor -- 4002920

      By Kkramme · Posted

      Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Kkramme
      Rare Seiko 5actus Watch??!! With a lot🤪🤔😲

      By Kkramme · Posted

      Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • Mercurial
      Smit

      By Mercurial · Posted

      I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • GuyMontag
      FHF70 balance jewels settings

      By GuyMontag · Posted

      It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
×
×
  • Create New...