Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a Certina quartz dress watch I would like to change the battery on but I can't figure out how to get the back off. I guess it's a snap on type but I can't see or find any groove for a case knife and the back is very tight. The watche used to belong to my father so I thought I'd check with you guys before wrecking any havoc.

 

56F7FFA0-96ED-4B47-9C5B-0667EC9058FE.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi  as a rule they are usually snap on unless they have the slots in the back for the removal tool and there again I have had some with the slots which were false and were snap on. Some of these can be very tight to remove. I had a Tissot snap on with no groove and had to use a tool, two types attached. They are usefull to have.

removal tool.jpg

back remover.jpg

Posted
51 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

Try removing the strap first. Sometines the notch is hidden between the lugs.

+1....try using a very thin blade like this...2065321311_ScreenShot2020-10-02at11_52_00.png.3d03cb0f231282350c9a275c48c5bf79.png

  • Like 1
Posted

I used those heavy razor blades for bezels too before I had the correct tool. 
 

I would start it with the blade and then get the case knife into the gap. 

Posted (edited)

Thank you guys for your answer, I've removed the strap and looked with magnification but I'm unable to see any notch or gap. If anything it looks like there is a small ridge in the case so you can't see the edge of the case back. 

I'm inclined to take the watch to a dealer to have the battery changed for this one ?

Edited by Flubber
Posted

Hi  Depending on you point of view it may be the best course in this case, but I would ask the question of the person who changes the battery if it is a snap on back for further reference.  The Investment of a proper tool for the job out weighs the price of battery fitting  (£10 £15) depending on where you go.  The price of a tool  £20 £40 .  Let us know the outcome.   good luck

  • Like 1
Posted

If getting it off is hard you may also have a problem getting it back on without a press tool. Another argument for sending it to a shop.

Anilv

  • Like 2
  • 2 years later...
Posted

Partial answer. It is a solid gold case. It can not be opened from the back. I have been able remove the split stem crown and pop out the crystal but there is still a bezel that holds the dial in place and shows no immediate way to remove without damage. Maybe someone will know how to safely remove the bezel. 

the pic of the empty case was found online but know guidance on how they got it that way.  The other is what is on my bench right now

certina case.JPG

air popper.JPG

20221213_125118.jpg

Posted
15 hours ago, TimesatHand said:

It can not be opened from the back.

If you look at the tools that were being suggested it might've still been opened the back. Of course getting it back together again that might have been an issue. This is why any time you can't figure out how the Back comes off best proceed with extreme caution especially on Expensive watches.

15 hours ago, TimesatHand said:

split stem crown

Then just a warning about split stems. Most of them do just pull out with force but not all of them. It's been discussed on this message board before Medo for instance has one that if you yank it out well I had to fix it for the other watchmaker it took us one year to source all the components to put the thing back together again. So some of the split stems the movement has to slide out pulling hard is very bad

Then confusion on my part? Is your watch the exact same watch as this discussion? Then your sample picture is that the exact same case that you have?

Then a bit of a confusion because your movement isn't coming out it would be really nice to have a really nice side view picture of the case. Sometimes on the front side that can be separated from the rest of the case. But we need a really nice picture because otherwise it doesn't look like your dials coming out and I can't see if the resolution the picture why not so we need some better case pictures.

 

Posted

Better pictures don't really help but I included them.  I have scoured the case with my 10x loupe for at least 20 minutes looking for any sign of a "sweet spot" or any sign of separation.  According to the web site I took the sample pic from the two have the same case markings.  I am convinced it is a frontal removal otherwise why use a split stem. I think the inner bezel was meant to fall out, but time may have created a tighter than normal fit.  The watch is in such pristine condition I do not want to force anything especially without more certainty.  the customer is pretty desperate. It look like the only Certina service center is in Switzerland and I wouldn't know where to send our customer other than there. The slight scratching was from someone else.  Luckily they gave up before doing too much damage.

20221214_194418.jpg

20221214_194512.jpg



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • …it’s a very clean look done very well. Thanks for sharing…and may I inquire what’s on the bench behind?
    • Thanks for the information, its a big help. I'll try and pull off the pipe. I think I'll try using the Presto hand remover. Then I guess I'll try to fit the pipe into the hands(?) though maybe I won't have to as I'm putting a new set of hands on the movement. 
    • One of the problems with chronograph hands and whoever manufactured the watch would be that often times they are put on with considerable force. The problem with the amount of force they go on with is that often times when removed they disintegrate. So disintegrating hands unfortunately is quite common on a chronograph. With those lucky enough to have an account with were be authorized by whoever made the watch or the service center they would have a complete package of hands. so yes that does look like the brass tube of the hand that disintegrated.  
    • The unfortunate problem of the three jar cleaning machine. At least I assume it's a three jar machine. Classically with three jar machine the first is a cleaner and the second to be a rinse of the same type. Cleaning is a interesting process and it's not exactly cleaning and rinsed the entire procedure is cleaning. The cleaner is supposed to have chemicals to put things in the solution and things to make things right and shiny. The rinse continues to put things in solution and reduces the concentration of things in the fluid on the plates. Ideally you should have two rinses not one and alcohol. If you look at the modern cleaning machines you find typically now they will have a minimum of four jars or whatever. Often times the last one will have alcohol because depending upon where you live the rinse itself may not evaporate. So you have a final rinse of alcohol just to rinse off the rinse. Then the only thing I've ever seen on baskets would be this quoted below from something Omega has. But they are assuming that you have genuine Elma baskets and not a machine made in India from unknown materials. Although a lot of people are using the baskets from India I just don't know enough about them. Personally I've see in the baskets for other machines especially the holder which would be as it's implied below nickel plated where the plating wears off and eventually the brass will be etched away from the chemicals in the cleaning product. One thing I didn't see you mention was how long in the each of the baths? Usually for the cleaning products that make things bright and shiny. Time-limited approximately 4 minutes works really well. The rinses of less of concern it depends upon how much the cleaning fluid is dissolved in it though. You can download the specifications the cleaning products I like they have recommended times the final alcohol rinse is supposed to be relatively short as any time we mention alcohol and watches people get excited over dissolving the shellac. But typically with isopropyl alcohol it takes a little while longer and I've even used alcohol which I know dissolves shellac but I was just using it to rinse off the rinse so it was never a problem.  
    • I think i am done. I was working withe two pieces, one was 316 SS and the other 304 SS. The starting material for 304 was thinner, so I opted for finishing it. Since I only have images of one of these watches, I cannot know the exact dimensions. The owner is not critical...just wants a working solution. I think this is it. It was quite the challenge to turn the inside  locking rim. An inside angle cut. Had to be damn close in order to have a snap fit. Frankly I think I just got lucky. Sometimes lucky is better than smart! The inside edge that interfaces with the crystal is an interference fit. This was on purpose in case my locking-edge cut was overshot...then the bezel and crystal would work together to stay put. Tens of hours working on this, and I learned a lot!    
×
×
  • Create New...