Jump to content

No Side Shake


Nora

Recommended Posts

Hello All

I've changed the balance staff and trued the balance wheel in an Elgin 12s grade 303. The staff binds in the last 16th turn till tight of the cock screw. The wheel can be easily turned but does not spin freely. With out the staff in, the cock tightens an 8th of a turn past the binding point. The problem is that there is no side shake in the last bit. I found that when the cock has been tighten the staff will stick in the cock jewel. My first choice I feel is to shim the cock, but what type of stock should I get? Also what is the best way to trim it to shape? The thought of some type of broach to open the one end of the jewel also crossed my mind. but what type of broach? All of what I see for sale new just refers to use on metal.

Thank you in advance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On newer watches where the jewel is pressed into the mainplate it is possible to press the jewel in a bit to achieve the required endshake.

Im not familiar with the Elgin 303 but I would also check if the balance jewels have been swapped round as this can cause problems if they're not identical.

Another thing to check that the roller jewel interacts correctly with the pallet fork. If the staff is too long on the mainplate end the roller may only contact at the tip of the jewel instead of in the middle, shimming the balance cock wont help improve this.

Good luck.

Anilv

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is staff shoulder curved on this?  Dose staff get stuck to the jewel on cock side only?

If staff shoulder and jewel face are not compatible( shoulder curved and jewel face flat) , you should see excess variation in FU position, even when you do create some end shake.

How are jewels to be moved if secured in place by screws? 

If pivot is bent, TG would show it as you increase the end shake.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when you replace the staff did you measure the old staff versus the new staff? then what was the actual staff number you used? Also are you aware of that Elgin staff numbers are not unique parts? In other words typically with each of their balance staffs the pivots sizes could very. So for instance for the grade 303 your staff numbers 2802 which came in four different pivots sizes.

unfortunately unlike Swiss watches where one staff is probably the right staff American pocket watch staff replacement has issues. It's why it's very important to measure all of the dimensions of the old versus new staff to avoid unpleasant surprises. That's because there are variations in sizing not just with the pivots size. Then a lot of times with modern replacement staff's rather than having four different pivots sizes they will just have a large size and allow the watchmaker to reduce the pivots to fit their watch.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

 Dose staff get stuck to the jewel on cock side only?

 

Yes, and only when tightened fully. I haven't installed the hairspring  yet, nor is the fork in either.  After the balance becomes to stiff to turn freely it will come out with the balance cock.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

when you replace the staff did you measure the old staff versus the new staff? then what was the actual staff number you used? Also are you aware of that Elgin staff numbers are not unique parts? In other words typically with each of their balance staffs the pivots sizes could very. So for instance for the grade 303 your staff numbers 2802 which came in four different pivots sizes.

Yes I measured them. I ordered 6 2802's to start with and sifted threw them to find a match. I was not aware that there are 4 pivot sizes. All of what I received have an OAL of .162" with a   pivot diameter of .004". So I just went with it. There was nothing for me to compare with the pivots, both ends from the original were missing. What makes them different is the shoulder dimensions. 

Are you aware of any listing that shows the pivot sizes options for  each watch type? I got the staff part  number from https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/  but as you pointed out there are 4 sizes of 2802 staffs. The side note said  "See notes on Balance Staffs in Special Information Section". However that made no mention of any variations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Nora said:

Yes, and only when tightened fully. I haven't installed the hairspring  yet, nor is the fork in either.  After the balance becomes to stiff to turn freely it will come out with the balance cock.  

Pivot shoulder might partially be entering the jewel hole and stick to it, I examine the jewel under magnification for sign of damage. No need to remove the jewel, just view it from under side of the cock.

Jewel hole might be way larger in diameter than pivot, in which case you should feel excess side shake when cock is not fully tightened.

Dirty upper jewels is likeliest and most common cause.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Pivot shoulder might partially be entering the jewel hole and stick to it, I examine the jewel under magnification for sign of damage.

I believe this may be true. All looked well with 10x. So I removed the cap jewel then reassembled. If the pivot jewel is seated fully it will bind. With slight movement of the balance wheel to  dislodge the jewel it will spin freely again. However it will bind again under the weight of a 2 mm pegwood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nora said:

I believe this may be true. All looked well with 10x. So I removed the cap jewel then reassembled. If the pivot jewel is seated fully it will bind. With slight movement of the balance wheel to  dislodge the jewel it will spin freely again. However it will bind again under the weight of a 2 mm pegwood.

You might furthure narrow down the fault  by switching the upper and lower jewels around, then if staff still stick to the cock side, the cock itself might be bent, if it sticks to other side the fault is with the jewel. Bent pivot is very common. Both jewels should look the same, oil cups shouldn't face the pivots. Its either by elimination or visually spotting a fault.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HectorLooi said:

Looks like it's time for you to get a jewel hole gauge, a watchmaker's lathe, cutters, files, burnishers and start polishing down your pivots.

I'm hoping for next year. I have more learning to do before I make that plunge financially.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

You might furthure narrow down the fault  by switching the upper and lower jewels around, then if staff still stick to the cock side, the cock itself might be bent, if it sticks to other side the fault is with the jewel. Bent pivot is very common. Both jewels should look the same, oil cups shouldn't face the pivots. Its either by elimination or visually spotting a fault. 

as a reminder this is an American pocket watch swapping the jewels around doesn't always work because they're not always the same size. Then bent pivot shouldn't be an issue for a new balance staff hopefully.

pocket watch database is a good source for watch parts. If it's an Elgin watch you know the grade number this is another place to look although it does have a minor issue.

http://www.elginwatchparts.com/Script_Find_Grade.php

the minor issue is there's a reference to the notes found at the bottom of the page. Like for instance those balance hole jewels that somebody claimed were identical don't appear to be identical depending upon your serial number. Then there's a reference the balance staffs but that refers you to another section that doesn't exist on this page.

if you're going to work on American pocket watches there is a definite must-have reference book that almost no one has ever heard of which is Swartchild & Co Chart Book for American Balance Staffs. There is also a second book that has the jewels listed. I miss snip out the section on the balance staffs for you.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Swartchild-Co-Chart-Book-for-American-Balance-Staffs-reprint/162769575312?hash=item25e5d29d90:g:zhoAAOSw1HtfGEpv

then I'm attaching another image another way to tell if your staff is sized correctly for the whole although you do need to do this test before you've attached the balance wheel it's a little hard with the balance wheel on.

 

 

 

 

 

Elgin 12 size staff.JPG

side shake.JPG

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

as a reminder this is an American pocket watch swapping the jewels around doesn't always work because they're not always the same size. Then bent pivot shouldn't be an issue for a new balance staff hopefully.

pocket watch database is a good source for watch parts. If it's an Elgin watch you know the grade number this is another place to look although it does have a minor issue.

http://www.elginwatchparts.com/Script_Find_Grade.php

the minor issue is there's a reference to the notes found at the bottom of the page. Like for instance those balance hole jewels that somebody claimed were identical don't appear to be identical depending upon your serial number. Then there's a reference the balance staffs but that refers you to another section that doesn't exist on this page.

if you're going to work on American pocket watches there is a definite must-have reference book that almost no one has ever heard of which is Swartchild & Co Chart Book for American Balance Staffs. There is also a second book that has the jewels listed. I miss snip out the section on the balance staffs for you.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Swartchild-Co-Chart-Book-for-American-Balance-Staffs-reprint/162769575312?hash=item25e5d29d90:g:zhoAAOSw1HtfGEpv

then I'm attaching another image another way to tell if your staff is sized correctly for the whole although you do need to do this test before you've attached the balance wheel it's a little hard with the balance wheel on.

 

 

 

 

 

Elgin 12 size staff.JPG

side shake.JPG

Is staff replaced with the right one? Are jewels, pivots and the cock perfect?  A host of possible causes are to be checked in the hopes of finding the fault. 

Regards

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you all for the useful  information! I have found the definite problem that is causing it to bind.  The pivot is indeed to large for the hole in the jewel. I took one of the other staffs with the same sized pivots and tried putting it in the hole with the balance cock flipped over. It comes nowhere near the shoulder, but binds up on the pivot itself The staffs that I've got are generic  from an eBay store. I don't mind the outcome. I have learned a lot about what more I need to learn /get to make it happen. I'll come back to it again as a future project.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/6/2020 at 5:03 AM, JohnR725 said:

when you replace the staff did you measure the old staff versus the new staff? then what was the actual staff number you used? Also are you aware of that Elgin staff numbers are not unique parts? In other words typically with each of their balance staffs the pivots sizes could very. So for instance for the grade 303 your staff numbers 2802 which came in four different pivots sizes.

unfortunately unlike Swiss watches where one staff is probably the right staff American pocket watch staff replacement has issues. It's why it's very important to measure all of the dimensions of the old versus new staff to avoid unpleasant surprises. That's because there are variations in sizing not just with the pivots size. Then a lot of times with modern replacement staff's rather than having four different pivots sizes they will just have a large size and allow the watchmaker to reduce the pivots to fit their watch.

 

bingo. working on an Hampden a few weeks ago shaking my head in utter confusion staring at my bench....then found out exactly what you said. there's a guy in Ohio I get my stuff from says he has all the old Dueber-Hampden stuff from parts left over after the move to mother russia.  staffs are all over the place. in the beginning he had had the same problem. had to measure and  fit up staff to cap and pinion jewels, both top and bottom. got passed that, worked like butter. gave me a helluva headache tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nora said:

Thank you all for the useful  information! I have found the definite problem that is causing it to bind.  The pivot is indeed to large for the hole in the jewel. I took one of the other staffs with the same sized pivots and tried putting it in the hole with the balance cock flipped over. It comes nowhere near the shoulder, but binds up on the pivot itself The staffs that I've got are generic  from an eBay store. I don't mind the outcome. I have learned a lot about what more I need to learn /get to make it happen. I'll come back to it again as a future project.  

ain't it fun?! was at the same point you are just days ago. John has some great references for keeping at hand. that diagram he shared is exactly part of the info that helped me when I was stumped except I got it out of a copy of the Chicago School of Watchmaking. I learned this from an old retired repairman when I bought his old staking set. Warning! as I was told, don't attempt to read it. there is just to much to try and soak in, the book is huge. instead he said, dig into your watches, and reference it as you go along. Otherwise he said, "you'll go nuts!" he was right. it works for me. enjoy.

Edited by MechanicMike
wrong name!
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 🤣 i think your first statement is rather dramatic, but i will take it in good humour.  I think the thread speaks for itself John.  What we are aiming for and when i say we, thats not actually that many that have spoke up. Is to have a back up plan to keep members in touch in case the forum ever disappears. So in essence yes the group has maybe taken on a life of its own and would like to remain together forever ( 🤣 i can also be dramatic )  maybe more members need to give some input of how they feel about it or say they are just not that bothered.  Either way at least the question gets answered. Can i ask what the forum means to you and how you would feel without it ?
    • you should go to the European patent office and look up watch patents. I'm guessing it's probably impossible to make anything related to watches without stepping on somebody's patent it's good that they expire with time. They've literally as far as I can tell patented everything and anything. this is why is pointing out their other formulas for the Epilam I'm pretty sure Rolex might have their own formula for instance. somewhere in the universe I was once reading things that were rejected for patents for basically this kind of thing. So yes there is rules on what can and cannot be patented but I'm sure things fall through the cracks.  
    • Here is all the info on the 'Brocot' suspension block and regulating arbor. http://www.ian-partridge.co.uk/brocotsq.htm
    • I usually don't read new introductions but when you came to the group did you want to learn watch repair? The reason I ask is your watch seems so suffered some damage under your hands. And now you're ready to move on to a new patient and have you learned? I often relate watch repair like learning to be a doctor lots of practicing. Even though this is a damaged watch have you practice taking it apart and putting it together a whole bunch at times so you feel confident that the next watch you probably won't break anything? Then when watches were invented specifically pallet forks they didn't have epoxy glue which even if they did they wouldn't you used anyway because the pallet stones need to be moved around they need to be adjusted. so the substance of choice for holding pallet stones and roller jewel's in is shellac. It's a really interesting substance were if it's warmed up at melts the palace on can be moved around hopefully the correct position when it cools shellac hardens back up in the pallet stone will be held in place. If you're carefully could probably put your pallet stone back just warm up the fork carefully ideally there's a tool for this and your pallet stone would be fine.
    • Hi @JohnR725, I would say its a happy end, the watch was in a much worser state and turned out quite nice(imho). I just hoped for a higher result after all that work.  I agree with you, as long as it runs and keeps time, Im happy. Thank you for your advices!   
×
×
  • Create New...