Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Bought this £4.00. I bought it because I read that Camy Geneve have good movements. This one doesn't reek quality to me, am I wrong? 20220523_163332.thumb.jpg.7564162e00338987c06a56a8761bd224.jpg

Just now, RichardHarris123 said:

Bought this £4.00. I bought it because I read that Camy Geneve have good movements. This one doesn't reek quality to me, am I wrong? 20220523_163332.thumb.jpg.7564162e00338987c06a56a8761bd224.jpg

 

20220523_163227.jpg

Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Bought this £4.00. I bought it because I read that Camy Geneve have good movements. This one doesn't reek quality to me, am I wrong? 20220523_163332.thumb.jpg.7564162e00338987c06a56a8761bd224.jpg

 

20220523_163227.jpg

No Richard, you are quite correct Camy have always been a good quality brand. You do know what you have here though dont know 🤦‍♂️. I'm ever so pleased you only paid 4 quid for it though.

2 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

My says I'm crazy all the time.  Maybe we all are. 

Nah mate its just you, shes already told me 🤣

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Sounded rude but i left it like that anyway 🤪
Posted
30 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

No Richard, you are quite correct Camy have always been a good quality brand. You do know what you have here though dont know 🤦‍♂️. I'm ever so pleased you only paid 4 quid for it though.

Nah mate its just you, shes already told me 🤣

She told me, she had appeased some crazy old bloke.  It most of been you. Hehe. 

 

As for the Camy, yes I know what I have.  I bought it without seeing the movement because it was £4. I wouldn't spend good money without seeing inside. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

She told me, she had appeased some crazy old bloke.  It most of been you. Hehe. 

 

As for the Camy, yes I know what I have.  I bought it without seeing the movement because it was £4. I wouldn't spend good money without seeing inside. 

Haha appeased, yes mate its been a while since I've been appeased. Tell her thanks for the appeasement 😂

Posted
31 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

She told me, she had appeased some crazy old bloke.  It most of been you. Hehe. 

 

As for the Camy, yes I know what I have.  I bought it without seeing the movement because it was £4. I wouldn't spend good money without seeing inside. 

I don't know whether to service it for the practice or hit it with a hammer.  The case is decent though.

Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

This one doesn't reek quality to me, am I wrong?

Well it depends. The basic movement is fine, but this looks like the last gasp of the FHF 9X series ( I think it is probably an FHF 97)

Earlier versions were much better engineered, but by the time this variant came out, probably around 1980 the quartz crisis had taken hold, and the engineering was being "en-cheapened" as much as possible.

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?13&ranfft&2&2uswk&FHF_97

If you clean and service it, it will probably run reasonably well (assuming it hasn't been previously butchered in the back streets of Mumbai of course).

Is it, or was it ever associated in any way with "Camy"? Probably not, but it does have a certain charm and was, in my opinion worth the not very much you paid for it.

"Swiss Made"? Kinda, sorta, maybe, but with a slightly spicy past.

Edited by AndyHull
Posted
38 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

Well it depends. The basic movement is fine, but this looks like the last gasp of the FHF 9X series ( I think it is probably an FHF 97)

Earlier versions were much better engineered, but by the time this variant came out, probably around 1980 the quartz crisis had taken hold, and the engineering was being "en-cheapened" as much as possible.

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?13&ranfft&2&2uswk&FHF_97

If you clean and service it, it will probably run reasonably well (assuming it hasn't been previously butchered in the back streets of Mumbai of course).

Is it, or was it ever associated in any way with "Camy"? Probably not, but it does have a certain charm and was, in my opinion worth the not very much you paid for it.

"Swiss Made"? Kinda, sorta, maybe, but with a slightly spicy past.

I still quite like it. It's actually running well. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Interesting coincidence a friend brought me an FHF96N for a service. Running very well (with a bit of beat error of 9ms) despite it was not serviced like probably ever, just by adding a bit of lubrication. Lubricating of the balance jewel is going to be an issue for me though, look at the "shock spring"! 🙂 I might need to do it from the "other side". As far as I know he could also put it into the 404 club, he said postage was more that the watch itself.

IMG_0237.JPG

IMG_0238.JPG

IMG_20220524_102347.jpg

 

IMG_20220524_103009.jpg\

ps.: its not cleaned and serviced yet, with a full wind it was running ~1,5 days. Going to attempt a service and a beat error correction.

Edited by luiazazrambo
Posted
2 minutes ago, luiazazrambo said:

Interesting coincidence a friend brought me an FHF96N for a service. Running very well (with a bit of beat error of 9ms) despite it was not serviced like probably ever, just by adding a bit of lubrication. Lubricating of the balance jewel is going to be an issue for me though, look at the "shock spring"! 🙂 I might need to do it from the "other side". As far as I know he could also put it into the 404 club, he said postage was more that the watch itself.

IMG_0237.JPG

IMG_0238.JPG

IMG_20220524_102347.jpg

IMG_20220524_103009.jpg

Wow, a genuine Oris. I wouldn't like to try and lift the shock springs either. 

Posted
1 hour ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Wow, a genuine Oris. I wouldn't like to try and lift the shock springs either. 

Im not so sure that Oris ever used the st96. Oris were dependent up until 1970 when they were sold to asaug. And then became independent again in the early 80s. I have dozens of Oris watches  not one of them has anything but a genuine marked Oris calibre inside. Its extremely unlikely that asaug used another swiss movement in the 12 years that they ran Oris, why would they ? Oris had a decent reputation for in house movements. I think we have another Mumbai here. The st96 is used extensively in India. Lots of them, cheap and easy to work on.

Posted

I got this for free with some other watches.  It was free for a very obvious reason.  The dial, hands etc nearly fooled me. Hehe. 

Decent movement, I'll do something with the dial. 

20220525_171637.jpg

20220525_171617.jpg

55 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

I got this for free with some other watches.  It was free for a very obvious reason.  The dial, hands etc nearly fooled me. Hehe. 

Decent movement, I'll do something with the dial. 

20220525_171637.jpg

20220525_171617.jpg

Is this a genuine crown though? 

56 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

though

20220525_181334.thumb.jpg.f27baef6b928c8c847053df334f4c049.jpg

Posted
17 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Is this a genuine crown though? 

Unlikely. Pretty much any "Faulex" will have a fake crown. There is probably a factory in China dedicated solely to making fake Rolex crowns.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

The movement is a new one on me. PRIM 68 (I think).

Interesting that the Chinese didn't invent the counterfeit Rolex. I have one with a nice ETA 2789 inside.

19 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

I'll do something with the dial

Are you planning to modify it somehow?

 

Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, Klassiker said:

PRIM 68 (I think).

Interesting. Another movement maker I didn't know about. -> http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Prim_68_3

They are still around apparently. -> https://www.prim.cz/our-history

Furthermore they seem to do some interesting watches with their own in house movements.

https://www.prim.cz/watches?filter[tags_0][]=1

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

Interesting. Another movement maker I didn't know about. -> http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Prim_68_3

They are still around apparently. -> https://www.prim.cz/our-history

Furthermore they seem to do some interesting watches with their own in house movements.

https://www.prim.cz/watches?filter[tags_0][]=1

Looks a decent movement.  Running well but needs a service. 

Posted
43 minutes ago, Klassiker said:

I'll do something with the dial

I like the dial. It looks quite reasonable quality, and may be the original Prim dial, just overprinted with Rolex etc. I would keep it as is, its an interesting conversation piece, and its not as if changing the dial is going to add value to it.

Posted
44 minutes ago, Klassiker said:

The movement is a new one on me. PRIM 68 (I think).

Interesting that the Chinese didn't invent the counterfeit Rolex. I have one with a nice ETA 2789 inside.

Are you planning to modify it somehow?

 

Yes I need to do something with the dial.  I gave it a quick xlean last night hoping the lettering would come of but no.

1 minute ago, AndyHull said:

I like the dial. It looks quite reasonable quality, and may be the original Prim dial, just overprinted with Rolex etc. I would keep it as is, its an interesting conversation piece, and its not as if changing the dial is going to add value to it.

Pictures with glass off, yes a decent dial. Crap hands.

20220525_182458.jpg

Posted (edited)

Prim started off making a copy of the Lip R25 which they called the Prim 52 so far as I can tell.

image.png.5c9720bc5a2951232b16fe23267b74bd.png

 

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Lip_R25

 

image.png.6116fae5e93366cc752fecba08482d7a.png

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Prim_52

They then seem to have gone on to develop their own movements.

If you want to upgrade the hands, ranff lists the sizes for the PRIM 68 as

Hands
1.40 x 0.80 x 0.18mm

I suspect the originals will respond well to a gentle polish though.

Edited by AndyHull
Posted
Just now, AndyHull said:

Prim started off making a copy of the Lip R25 which they called the Prim 52 so far as I can tell.

image.png.5c9720bc5a2951232b16fe23267b74bd.png

 

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Lip_R25

 

image.png.6116fae5e93366cc752fecba08482d7a.png

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Prim_52

They then seem to have gone on to develop their own movements.

If you want to upgrade the hands, ranff lists the sizes for the PRIM 68 as

Hands
1.40 x 0.80 x 0.18mm

I suspect the originals will respond to a gentle polish though.

Probably, the second hand is loose.

Posted

Picked this up in a lot of 3 total. It was $10 U.S. for all. There was a Bulova 10AX movement that I needed for parts, a Timex Electronic (which I'm working on) and this: a nice little Orient Crystal.  It's a nice, smooth-running automatic with day & date.  Thank heaven it keeps such excellent time, because it is so quiet I can't hear it ticking at all.  I haven't had it on a timegrapher yet but it's been running for a few days now and I can't tell if it's off even by a second.  I will always prefer pocket watches, but this wrist watch can be one of my exceptions. 

IMG_20220527_213339.jpg

  • Like 5
Posted (edited)
On 5/26/2022 at 6:31 AM, AndyHull said:

Furthermore they seem to do some interesting watches with their own in house movements.

https://www.prim.cz/watches?filter[tags_0][]=1

Interesting indeed... They've got an automatic full calendar cam actuated chronograph (looks for all the world like a 7750 base, but they claim manufacture, which is pretty common if they so much as polish a screw for themselves these days) for a pretty reasonable price (€4K). At least I assume that's reasonable... I'm not a fan of the 7750, or calendar chronographs, so I don't really track prices of those sorts of things.

Edited by spectre6000

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Get well soon Old Hippy, torn muscles.,  not good
    • Id love to see how he has the output shaft mounted to this setup, as I have the same rotary stage and stepper in my build.
    • If you see at least one thread protruding, or even a half, then you may have a chance using this "tool", but don't squeeze hard. Lot's of patience, and if you notice any signs of loctite or other adhesives, then apply several drops of acetone on top of broken stem. Use heat (hair dryer) also. You should be able gradually turn it counterclockwise, just like i did on this broken Timex stem, which was glued with something like nail hardener. Then you can use an extender to save your broken stem. https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/513DVvkfW5L.__AC_SX300_SY300_QL70_ML2_.jpg   You can also try cutting a small grove / slot on top of the broken stem to use 0.7mm flat screwdriver.   Depending on the Crown material and Stem material, you can try dissolving the stem. 
    • How long had it been without any wind before you first put it on the timegrapher?  Perhaps there was some debris / old lubricant that loosened up while you were waiting to do the 24 hour reading? I recently serviced a Seiko 6319 that immediately after service was absolutely horrible on the timegrapher - 24 hours later (without me doing anything) it was rock solid!  I was a little surprised by this (as I have seen improvements in amplitude after letting it run in but never a watch going from useless to great!). I was suspicious that some dirt must still be in there so I took it apart and cleaned and lubcricated it again and had exactly the same experience - snow storm that after some hours turned into a nice straigh line with good amplitude 🤷‍♂️
    • Yes, I know it was able to run before just enough that everything supposed to be affixed with shellac could fall out. I won't get back to work on this watch for several days at least, but one thing you mentioned about the banking pin adjustments being intended for fork horn clearance got me wondering.... The last adjustment I made to the entry stone yesterday did not solve the problem when the balance is installed. The escape teeth can't quite clear the stone when the balance swings. But I thought it was going to work because manually snapping the fork back and forth did allow the escape wheel to advance almost all the time. I wonder if there's another issue with the impulse jewel, that I have to shellac again anyway. I am going to measure the fork slot and the jewel because I am curious if it is the right size or possibly narrower than it should be. My thinking is if the horn clearance is too great maybe it is not getting enough impulse to clear the escape tooth. But pushing the fork with a tool can move it far enough to clear the escape wheel tooth.  I'll see later in the week. I didn't expect a big challenge from this watch because it ticked for 5 minutes before stopping without shellac. As always I was way wrong.
×
×
  • Create New...