Jump to content

Mindboggling


Recommended Posts

I find it mind boggling that people will pay this sort of money for a 7750. In the same listing you have the same exact movement for a fraction of the price. People have no clue what inside of a watch these days. 9fee507362a03afa65008df63b3a9d6a.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bjd1020 said:

I find it mind boggling that people will pay this sort of money for a 7750.

That is only an asking price, it's common to see exaggeratedly high ones for any kind of item. If you want the see the actual going price search for completed sales.
Anyway to me paying more than $1,000 for a 7750 watch just because is made by a sub-brand of the other one that makes mature men drool is craziness already. I have for sale an nice Swiss, brand new 7750 from a popular but not-so-lucky maker and it will be hard to less for $800.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bjd1020 said:

I find it mind boggling that people will pay this sort of money for a 7750. In the same listing you have the same exact movement for a fraction of the price. People have no clue what inside of a watch these days.

Maybe I misunderstand your post. "Normal people" don't by a watch primarily for its movement. What matters is the brand and what it looks like. You can buy a new Breitling for $4000 housing an ETA 2824-2 (albeit decorated and chronometer).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, VWatchie said:

 You can buy a new Breitling for $4000 housing an ETA 2824-2 (albeit decorated and chronometer).

Breitling, like IWC and others that I don't care to mention here is another  notorious "overcharger" which bases sales on active lifestyle sponsorships and advertising - they deliver little innovation beside casemaking. Most people would not even care to know that for the same money you can buy a bespoken automatic watch, designed and produced  in house during this decade.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, VWatchie said:

"Normal people" don't by a watch primarily for its movement. What matters is the brand and what it looks like

What I find interesting is on the other end of the price scale. Five dollar plastic quartz watches in cases that somebody spent a couple hundred dollars for because they like the way it looked or the like the brand name and they don't care because nobody bothered to tell them that their watch inside is worth five dollars. After all If your A watch salesman why would you tell someone what's inside the watch your there to make money.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I find interesting is on the other end of the price scale. Five dollar plastic quartz watches in cases that somebody spent a couple hundred dollars for because they like the way it looked or the like the brand name and they don't care because nobody bothered to tell them that their watch inside is worth five dollars. After all If your A watch salesman why would you tell someone what's inside the watch your there to make money.
Exactly. Maybe thats more the point I was trying to make. I dont think people understand the differences in terms of value that goes inside the watch they are wearing. The history on the whole watch movement industry from the 50s to now with the consolidation is quite a story.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is only an asking price, it's common to see exaggeratedly high ones for any kind of item. If you want the see the actual going price search for completed sales.
Anyway to me paying more than $1,000 for a 7750 watch just because is made by a sub-brand of the other one that makes mature men drool is craziness already. I have for sale an nice Swiss, brand new 7750 from a popular but not-so-lucky maker and it will be hard to less for $800.
Id say once you get past $1000 unless the watch has gold or diamonds youve pretty much exceeded the value of the best 7750s in my opinion.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole question of price is based on brand names, the bigger the brand the greater the price. The same can be said at the other end of the scale  the greater profit is a cheap movement in a flash big brand case. The average watch buyer knows nothing about the mechanics of the watch only that it carries an in you face  big brand and by that has street cred. But as Old Hippy says its their money and if they want to spend it on a flash watch with no guts that's their problem. They only get disapointed when it stops and Mr watchmaker  tells them it cant be fixed and the answer then is I paid £££££s for that watch. Up till then is just bling on the wrist.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As is tradition, one step forward, two steps back. Got the board populated and soldered into place without any issues.   But no hum. So I started testing the coils with an ohmmeter. I got 5.84k ohms across D1 (from red to red in the picture below), which is as expected. But I'm getting an open circuit for the other drive coil and feedback coil, D2 and F1 (from green to each of the two yellows).   Since the movement was working with my breadboard setup, it implies I somehow broke the connection between the coils and the solder lugs. They're all the way at the bottom of the lugs, but maybe the heat migrated down and broke the connections? I guess it's possible it happened while cleaning the flux off, but I used a soft artist's brush and isopropyl alcohol. I did a lot of high magnification examination, and I don't see any issues, but let me know if you see anything I missed or if you can think of anything else I should check.
    • 1947 NOS Ambassador 'C'. Actually, the case came without the movement so the movement isn't NOS, but she sure is pretty.
    • Hi attached is the AS 20XX. Service sheet although there is no 2063 mentioned it may be of some use to you AS_AS 2060,1,2,6,4,6.pdf
    • one of the problems we have is visible versus invisible. For instance millennium disulfide another high pressure lubricant black in color. I was told by somebody worked for the Boeing company that they had a piston like device somewhere that has eight call it around it to grab it so it has to slide and in the collet has to grab. But if somebody puts that type of dry grease on where grease with that in it it embeds itself basically in the metal and they have to throw the whole part away they get use it all. So I suspect on all the dry powdery lubricants that they will go into all the basically microscopic cracks and crannies of the metaland that's where it is visually at least until you scrub it off your visually going to see it which is good because you want your lubrication the stay word is. But I'm sure it doesn't last forever on the metal it's just a really nice lubrication  
    • Thanks for the info. I can't seem to find tech sheets for those either.  I'll muddle my way though 🙂
×
×
  • Create New...