Jump to content

Mindboggling


Recommended Posts

I find it mind boggling that people will pay this sort of money for a 7750. In the same listing you have the same exact movement for a fraction of the price. People have no clue what inside of a watch these days. 9fee507362a03afa65008df63b3a9d6a.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bjd1020 said:

I find it mind boggling that people will pay this sort of money for a 7750.

That is only an asking price, it's common to see exaggeratedly high ones for any kind of item. If you want the see the actual going price search for completed sales.
Anyway to me paying more than $1,000 for a 7750 watch just because is made by a sub-brand of the other one that makes mature men drool is craziness already. I have for sale an nice Swiss, brand new 7750 from a popular but not-so-lucky maker and it will be hard to less for $800.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bjd1020 said:

I find it mind boggling that people will pay this sort of money for a 7750. In the same listing you have the same exact movement for a fraction of the price. People have no clue what inside of a watch these days.

Maybe I misunderstand your post. "Normal people" don't by a watch primarily for its movement. What matters is the brand and what it looks like. You can buy a new Breitling for $4000 housing an ETA 2824-2 (albeit decorated and chronometer).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, VWatchie said:

 You can buy a new Breitling for $4000 housing an ETA 2824-2 (albeit decorated and chronometer).

Breitling, like IWC and others that I don't care to mention here is another  notorious "overcharger" which bases sales on active lifestyle sponsorships and advertising - they deliver little innovation beside casemaking. Most people would not even care to know that for the same money you can buy a bespoken automatic watch, designed and produced  in house during this decade.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, VWatchie said:

"Normal people" don't by a watch primarily for its movement. What matters is the brand and what it looks like

What I find interesting is on the other end of the price scale. Five dollar plastic quartz watches in cases that somebody spent a couple hundred dollars for because they like the way it looked or the like the brand name and they don't care because nobody bothered to tell them that their watch inside is worth five dollars. After all If your A watch salesman why would you tell someone what's inside the watch your there to make money.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I find interesting is on the other end of the price scale. Five dollar plastic quartz watches in cases that somebody spent a couple hundred dollars for because they like the way it looked or the like the brand name and they don't care because nobody bothered to tell them that their watch inside is worth five dollars. After all If your A watch salesman why would you tell someone what's inside the watch your there to make money.
Exactly. Maybe thats more the point I was trying to make. I dont think people understand the differences in terms of value that goes inside the watch they are wearing. The history on the whole watch movement industry from the 50s to now with the consolidation is quite a story.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is only an asking price, it's common to see exaggeratedly high ones for any kind of item. If you want the see the actual going price search for completed sales.
Anyway to me paying more than $1,000 for a 7750 watch just because is made by a sub-brand of the other one that makes mature men drool is craziness already. I have for sale an nice Swiss, brand new 7750 from a popular but not-so-lucky maker and it will be hard to less for $800.
Id say once you get past $1000 unless the watch has gold or diamonds youve pretty much exceeded the value of the best 7750s in my opinion.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole question of price is based on brand names, the bigger the brand the greater the price. The same can be said at the other end of the scale  the greater profit is a cheap movement in a flash big brand case. The average watch buyer knows nothing about the mechanics of the watch only that it carries an in you face  big brand and by that has street cred. But as Old Hippy says its their money and if they want to spend it on a flash watch with no guts that's their problem. They only get disapointed when it stops and Mr watchmaker  tells them it cant be fixed and the answer then is I paid £££££s for that watch. Up till then is just bling on the wrist.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What this extra disk next to the pinion? Thats not part of the assembly 
    • It looks like the canon pinion function is part of this great wheel. The pinion nearest the clip runs the minute wheel on the dual side. The pinion nearest the wheel is driven by a small wheel from under the setting lever cover plate that engages in hand setting position.    So when assembled the crown was driving the whole great train. Does this mean the pinions are too tight? Should I attempt to disassemble this great wheel and lubricants?
    • Picking up this side-tracked post again as I just removed a balance staff of a 1920's Omega (35,5L-T1) I was impressed by the way @Delgetti had his setup when he had to change out a balance-staff (https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/28854-new-balance-staff-not-riveting-to-balance/page/2/#comment-244054 Not only that, but also the idea of removing the seat first before punching the staff out from the seat-side, avoiding the whole discussion of the rivet yes/no enlarging the hole. I didn't have the fancy clamps & tools Delgetti has, so I used my screw-head polishing tool. Initially I used #1500 grit diamond paste on the steel wheel, which kinda worked, but very slow. I changed to #800 grit diamond paste, which worked better, but still slow. Then I glued #240 sanding paper to the steel disk; That worked and the disk was hand-driven. Once close to the balance wheel, I took the sanding paper off and continued with #800 diamond paste. One can only do this when the balance wheel sits true on the staff and has no "wobble". I went on grinding until I saw some diamond paste on the rim of the balance wheel. This was as far as I could grind and it seemed that there wasn't much left of the seat. Carefully, with my staking set, I knocked the staff from the seat-side out. Turns out that the thickness of the seat left, now a small ring, was only 0.1mm. The balance wheel hole is in perfect shape and no damage done to the wheel at all. Of course, if the wheel has a "wobble" or isn't seated true on the balance staff, you can't get as close and there will be more left of the seat. In my case, it worked perfect 🙂 I'm very happy how this method worked out ! 😊  
    • As is tradition, one step forward, two steps back. Got the board populated and soldered into place without any issues.   But no hum. So I started testing the coils with an ohmmeter. I got 5.84k ohms across D1 (from red to red in the picture below), which is as expected. But I'm getting an open circuit for the other drive coil and feedback coil, D2 and F1 (from green to each of the two yellows).   Since the movement was working with my breadboard setup, it implies I somehow broke the connection between the coils and the solder lugs. They're all the way at the bottom of the lugs, but maybe the heat migrated down and broke the connections? I guess it's possible it happened while cleaning the flux off, but I used a soft artist's brush and isopropyl alcohol. I did a lot of high magnification examination, and I don't see any issues, but let me know if you see anything I missed or if you can think of anything else I should check.
×
×
  • Create New...