Jump to content

Joesph hookers watch

SonnyBurnett
 Share

Recommended Posts

SonnyBurnett Watch Enthusiast

SonnyBurnett

Posted
Posted (edited)

Ebay has a watch for sale I am skeptical of. As a historian I know it's wrong but it says it's Joseph Hookers watch but cites the case number.  the movement itself is an 1883 PS Bartlett   circa 1898 many years after Hooker died.  how can we identify at least the case as being legitimate?

Hooker died in 1879.

Edited by SonnyBurnett
forgot information
Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldhippy Distinguished Member

oldhippy

Posted
Posted

A watch as important as that, I would say it should have provenance. Joseph Hooker is part of American history; I would have thought it would be in a museum. It is OK to post the link as I would like to take a look at it. I think it will be a fake.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldhippy Distinguished Member

oldhippy

Posted
Posted

This doesn’t convince me. As I have said no provenance. The price convinces me it’s not what the seller is making it out to be.  What the seller has said, you can copy all that off the net. To me it is just a Silver Waltham pocket watch.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
wls1971 Distinguished Member

wls1971

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, SonnyBurnett said:

how can we identify at least the case as being legitimate?

You cant no factory records have been found of Fahys watch case serial numbers, I would say the watch has never been owned or worn by Joseph Hooker, the listing does state that the watch has been appraised as being worth $1,650 dollars in 2012 I find that figure odd in itself why not $1,700 or $1,600, it just shows most appraisals are not worth the paper they are written on.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
FLwatchguy73 Super WRT Addict

FLwatchguy73

Posted
Posted

Exact dating of American pocket watch cases is very difficult. There is absolutely no way to ensure the movement and case are original to each other. English silver cases are very simple because they hallmarked everyone made for nearly 400 years. In America, however, makers stamps can help narrow the time frame a bit if you know what to look for. You can run a patent search on that specific model, but that is quite tedious and difficult. Another is to gather a sample of different watches with the same case stamps and compare the time frame of the movements which are easily dated and can be confirmed. If all the movements fall withing a specific window, then you can get a rough estimate of the date of the case. I spent sometime google searching the web looking for Fahys cases with the exact same stamp as the one featured in the auction. I found nearly a dozen with that same stamp. I then dated all the movements and found that NOT one single movement was manufactured before 1883 nor after 1889. Now this does not unequivocally prove the date, but for me, it's telling. I would avoid this watch at all costs! It's provenance is sketchy at best and the numbers absolutely do NOT line up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FLwatchguy73 Super WRT Addict

FLwatchguy73

Posted
Posted

The same seller is also selling what is purported to be Benjamin Franklin Butler's pocket watch. Just a cursory glance at the stamp on the case shows that it was not likely made before 1900. Butler died in 1893. The movement however dates to 1885, 8 years before his death. Butler was heavily involved in politics and as such likely kept a very busy social life. The purchase of a new watch by a man in his position at the age of 66 is totally plausible. That said, given the fact the seller hasn't sold anything in over a year and couple that with the other sketchy watch, I would avoid this one too, way too many inconsistencies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SonnyBurnett Watch Enthusiast

SonnyBurnett

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

I collect (and restore) firearms mostly military and mostly vintage and antique.  I do not invest hundreds or even several thousand dollars into a firearm that has no provenance.  Last one I bought was an 1880's Parker double barrel shotgun from R. Lee Ermys gun collection.  I did not buy it until his son Clinton contacted me and said a notarized signed letter would come with it and a Picture of Ermy with the gun with it.  It came and I bought the gun (hangs beautifully above the mantle)

This watch set off every red flag imaginable to me.  Hooker died in 79' the movement is an 83' model and that was huge to me.  I felt it to be a pile of (insert word of choice here).  Thanks guys I figured this was bunk but I'm new to watch repair and to some extent collecting.  I have been buying them almost all my life but just now taking time to know what they are and how fun it is to do this!

I contacted the seller for provenance last night before posting here.  He has yet to return my E-mail.

Simon.

Edited by SonnyBurnett
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SonnyBurnett Watch Enthusiast

SonnyBurnett

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 3/6/2020 at 5:43 PM, oldhippy said:

I can't wait to read his reply, that's if he gets back to you. 

He replied back to all questions with the same response each time.

 

"Good Afternoon, Sorry for the slow response I am traveling this weekend. Thank you for the inquiry. This watch came out of a collection owned by an archaeologist and collector. He passed away last year and now his wife is selling off some of his collection which is extensive. I have an appraisal from 2012 with an appraisal number. This is not my expertise so that’s why I started the auction at no reserve. Hopefully this helps. All the best!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dell
      What is the correct way to lubricate clock mainsprings?

      By Dell · Posted

      Surely it depends on the clock , I only usually restore torsion clocks and I only use oil on mainspring ( small amount) but on the few so called normal pendulum clocks I have done I have used mainspring grease as there is more reserves of power than there is in a torsion clock so it is not so critical. Dell
    • Delgetti
      Venus 178 hour counter creep

      By Delgetti · Posted

      https://watchguy.co.uk/cgi-bin/files?showfile=Venus/Venus 178.pdf&filename=Venus 178.pdf&dir=Technical Manuals&action=documents   The hour recorder is driven by the barrel and it will only stop if it is held by the hour recorder stop lever 8690. So I would check if this lever (powered by the spring 8691) is really holding the hour recorder in the "chrono off status". I haven't worked on a Venus 178 so far, but on an Omega 861 I chose 9501 grease for the friction spring as it's moving very slow at quite high tension.
    • Waggy
      Can someone please explain watchmaker service mark interpretation?

      By Waggy · Posted

      All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • Waggy
      Movement holder made with 3D printer

      By Waggy · Posted

      hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Mallard
      Vintage pocket watches from e-bay (winding stems needed)

      By Mallard · Posted

      Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
×
×
  • Create New...