Jump to content

Is this the wrong spring??


Lc130

Recommended Posts

Hi All

I'm a beginner.  I got the spring shown below from Otto Frei in the US.  It's for an AS 1700.  The supplier looked up the part number from the movement number.  When I look it up at J  Borel I get the same part that Otto Frei sent.

The problem is that while the spring certainly appears fully into the barrel, the lid wont close.  I've tried several times.

Any thoughts?

Thank you

Charlie

 

IMG_3380.JPG

IMG_3381.JPG

IMG_3382.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi  Chek that the outer coil is below the rim where the barrel lid fits on if so it may be just a tight fit, some can be a bit of a pest and need some pressure but don't distort the barrel or the lid or you will get binding problems.  If the spring is higher than the rim its wrong. Use a micrometer and measure the old spring for height.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Charlie,

as you suspected, it's the wrong spring. As suggested above, I checked the Ranfft site (a bit tricky to navigate from the homepage - click the "pink pages" button, then "archive", then in the category list "Archive: Watch Movements", then search for AS 1700. The mainspring is listed as Zf675, 1.20 x 9.5 x 0.10 x 315mm. You appear to have been sold a 3mm deep spring instead of 1.2mm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Klassiker said:

Hi Charlie,

as you suspected, it's the wrong spring. As suggested above, I checked the Ranfft site (a bit tricky to navigate from the homepage - click the "pink pages" button, then "archive", then in the category list "Archive: Watch Movements", then search for AS 1700. The mainspring is listed as Zf675, 1.20 x 9.5 x 0.10 x 315mm. You appear to have been sold a 3mm deep spring instead of 1.2mm.

Yup!  The new one measures 1.5 high.  The old 1.2.  Am I misreading the package label (beginner here)? It reads 3mm high, 0.105mm thick.  Is the last number the barrel diameter which I measure at 10mm.  

Interestingly, the same incorrect part comes up at J Borel.  How common is it that supply houses get it wrong?  As a follow up, where do they parts for no longer made watches?

It appears that the correct measurement is listed here https://watchguy.co.uk/cgi-bin/mainsprings

Thank you

Edited by Lc130
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The spring in your photos measures 1.5mm high, not 3mm? I was reading the label on the packaging different to you. 3mm high, diameter 10.5mm and 13cm (or 130mm) long. Which thinking about it is far too low to be the length. And no information about the strip thickness is also unlikely. I am baffled, to be honest.

Oh, wait! I just put the code number into Google and ended up at the same place quoted by rogart63, on the Cas-Kerr website. The dimensions are not mm but inches! Still don't make complete sense to me, but the 13 is probably the length in inches.

As you can see from the discrepancy between watchguy uk (great blog and source of info for us beginners by the way) and Ranfft, the exact spring dimensions are not critical. Obviously it needs to fit in the barrel, and being too powerful (too thick, too wide) can also cause problems. There should be springs available on the market which will do the job, even if one of these two isn't available.

There is an Ebay seller in Mannheim currently selling an NOS barrel complete for EUR 16.90, but maybe not posting to the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the part label is measured in Dennison.  The conversion formula is here https://mb.nawcc.org/threads/metric-to-dennison-conversion-formulas.54587/

After reviewing several sites it appears

1.2mm = 3 dennison

0.105mm height = 10.5

300mm length = 13

http://www.gruenwristwatches.com/gruen-mainspring-sizes-in-dennison.php

http://watchinprogress.com/mainspring-size-dennison-to-metric-conversion/

https://www.jewelerssupplies.com/media/pdfs/MainspringsCatalog2018.pdf

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Lc130 said:

I believe the part label is measured in Dennison.  The conversion formula is here https://mb.nawcc.org/threads/metric-to-dennison-conversion-formulas.54587/

After reviewing several sites it appears

1.2mm = 3 dennison

0.105mm height = 10.5

300mm length = 13

http://www.gruenwristwatches.com/gruen-mainspring-sizes-in-dennison.php

http://watchinprogress.com/mainspring-size-dennison-to-metric-conversion/

https://www.jewelerssupplies.com/media/pdfs/MainspringsCatalog2018.pdf

 

Seriously? Dennison? That's even more arcane than the Lancaster measurement which American pocket watches use to denote size. It's based on 1/30 inch. Arrrggh! Just when I thought some of the fog might be dissipating. I wonder how Liberia and Myanmar, the only other two countries currently using the imperial system of measurement, contend with this?

Edited by TexasDon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is just bonkers! No wonder they sent you the wrong size.

Well done for working it out. I checked Wikipedia, trying to understand the thinking behind this. Although it's not described directly, I guess it's something to do with the "American system of watch manufacturing".

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
    • Hi not found one either yet,  close relative is the 436 and 4361 according to ranff.db.   It gives quire a lot of detail but not as good as the old site.      RANFF.DB.
    • No problem to replace the setting with the staking set. Press the new setting from inside, use flat face punch with hole. The punch must be wider than the setting, the hole to be as not to press at the stone, but only on the bush. Press by hand until the setting gets flush with the plate surface, so the punch must rest on it.
    • Yes, the arbor usually makes about 3 to 3.5 turns. But usually spring takes 2/3 to 3/4 of the free space in barrel, not 1/2, so take it for the calcullations. This way the change in torque is smaller. I have a picture for You, this one is little older, but no mater
×
×
  • Create New...