Jump to content

Is this the wrong spring??


Lc130

Recommended Posts

Hi All

I'm a beginner.  I got the spring shown below from Otto Frei in the US.  It's for an AS 1700.  The supplier looked up the part number from the movement number.  When I look it up at J  Borel I get the same part that Otto Frei sent.

The problem is that while the spring certainly appears fully into the barrel, the lid wont close.  I've tried several times.

Any thoughts?

Thank you

Charlie

 

IMG_3380.JPG

IMG_3381.JPG

IMG_3382.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi  Chek that the outer coil is below the rim where the barrel lid fits on if so it may be just a tight fit, some can be a bit of a pest and need some pressure but don't distort the barrel or the lid or you will get binding problems.  If the spring is higher than the rim its wrong. Use a micrometer and measure the old spring for height.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Charlie,

as you suspected, it's the wrong spring. As suggested above, I checked the Ranfft site (a bit tricky to navigate from the homepage - click the "pink pages" button, then "archive", then in the category list "Archive: Watch Movements", then search for AS 1700. The mainspring is listed as Zf675, 1.20 x 9.5 x 0.10 x 315mm. You appear to have been sold a 3mm deep spring instead of 1.2mm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Klassiker said:

Hi Charlie,

as you suspected, it's the wrong spring. As suggested above, I checked the Ranfft site (a bit tricky to navigate from the homepage - click the "pink pages" button, then "archive", then in the category list "Archive: Watch Movements", then search for AS 1700. The mainspring is listed as Zf675, 1.20 x 9.5 x 0.10 x 315mm. You appear to have been sold a 3mm deep spring instead of 1.2mm.

Yup!  The new one measures 1.5 high.  The old 1.2.  Am I misreading the package label (beginner here)? It reads 3mm high, 0.105mm thick.  Is the last number the barrel diameter which I measure at 10mm.  

Interestingly, the same incorrect part comes up at J Borel.  How common is it that supply houses get it wrong?  As a follow up, where do they parts for no longer made watches?

It appears that the correct measurement is listed here https://watchguy.co.uk/cgi-bin/mainsprings

Thank you

Edited by Lc130
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The spring in your photos measures 1.5mm high, not 3mm? I was reading the label on the packaging different to you. 3mm high, diameter 10.5mm and 13cm (or 130mm) long. Which thinking about it is far too low to be the length. And no information about the strip thickness is also unlikely. I am baffled, to be honest.

Oh, wait! I just put the code number into Google and ended up at the same place quoted by rogart63, on the Cas-Kerr website. The dimensions are not mm but inches! Still don't make complete sense to me, but the 13 is probably the length in inches.

As you can see from the discrepancy between watchguy uk (great blog and source of info for us beginners by the way) and Ranfft, the exact spring dimensions are not critical. Obviously it needs to fit in the barrel, and being too powerful (too thick, too wide) can also cause problems. There should be springs available on the market which will do the job, even if one of these two isn't available.

There is an Ebay seller in Mannheim currently selling an NOS barrel complete for EUR 16.90, but maybe not posting to the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the part label is measured in Dennison.  The conversion formula is here https://mb.nawcc.org/threads/metric-to-dennison-conversion-formulas.54587/

After reviewing several sites it appears

1.2mm = 3 dennison

0.105mm height = 10.5

300mm length = 13

http://www.gruenwristwatches.com/gruen-mainspring-sizes-in-dennison.php

http://watchinprogress.com/mainspring-size-dennison-to-metric-conversion/

https://www.jewelerssupplies.com/media/pdfs/MainspringsCatalog2018.pdf

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Lc130 said:

I believe the part label is measured in Dennison.  The conversion formula is here https://mb.nawcc.org/threads/metric-to-dennison-conversion-formulas.54587/

After reviewing several sites it appears

1.2mm = 3 dennison

0.105mm height = 10.5

300mm length = 13

http://www.gruenwristwatches.com/gruen-mainspring-sizes-in-dennison.php

http://watchinprogress.com/mainspring-size-dennison-to-metric-conversion/

https://www.jewelerssupplies.com/media/pdfs/MainspringsCatalog2018.pdf

 

Seriously? Dennison? That's even more arcane than the Lancaster measurement which American pocket watches use to denote size. It's based on 1/30 inch. Arrrggh! Just when I thought some of the fog might be dissipating. I wonder how Liberia and Myanmar, the only other two countries currently using the imperial system of measurement, contend with this?

Edited by TexasDon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is just bonkers! No wonder they sent you the wrong size.

Well done for working it out. I checked Wikipedia, trying to understand the thinking behind this. Although it's not described directly, I guess it's something to do with the "American system of watch manufacturing".

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're thinking metal to jewel in general I guess. Maybe it would be a good idea to peg the pallet jewel hole on the main plate after the epilame treatment. I think that could work as it is my impression that the epilame doesn't sit very hard, but I could be wrong about that so feel free to educate me. I didn't remember that 9501 was thixotropic (thanks for the link). That would mean it's even runnier during impact (lower viscosity) so perhaps it's time I get some fresh grease as mine seems a bit too runny. What I have seen is a whitish surface after washing but it goes away if I scrub the surface with a brush in a degreaser (Horosolv). I don't think it embeds itself in the metal but sticks very hard to the metal. I don't worry too much about the cleaning solution. I just want perfectly clean parts and my solution can be replaced for little money (ELMA RED 1:9). Anyway, I quite often need "to strip back and rebuild" and scrubbing parts by hand isn't exactly the most stimulating part of a service.
    • I’ve had a couple movements where it is clear the previous watchmaker was diligent with lubrication but the old epilam had turned to a fine white powder covering the pallet fork and keyless parts, which can’t be good for parts. I’m spare with epi since I don’t know how long it takes to degrade to that state…
    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro. I thought the idea was for the epilame to create a barrier, a wall between the lubrication and anything else, so the lube cant spread.
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
    • I think attaching a nut to the lid to pull it off is the least destructive, any damage damage on the outside is going to an easier fix than any created when trying to push it out from the inside. Scratching up the inside of the lid , mainspring or arbor bearing will be risk. Just my opinion.
×
×
  • Create New...