Jump to content

Is this genuine seiko chronometer, seen one anywhere


Nucejoe

Recommended Posts

Hi all,  I recently aquired this seiko racing chronometer, have not seen one like it on internet or seiko site, whish raises doubt as to it's genuineness. Anybody seen one? Did seiko make racing chronometeres.

Seiko probably added such complications as chronometers on watches more than any other watchmaker. So wouldn,t have rivaled it's own product by making racing chronometers.

IMG-20181008-WA0009.jpg

IMG-20181008-WA0008.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

seiko racing chronometer

Yes I realize I'm splitting hairs here but I object to the word chronometer. Classically I think of a chronometer as a ships clock with a Detent escapement. Then a course today they refer to precision timekeeping watches as chronometers.

Then the pictures online for the Seiko Stopwatch 88-5021 All look identical to yours with an exception?  The exception is yours looks absolutely brand-new and the ones online do not. Then you even have the tag which is nice.

Then because I like seeing naked movements I found you video of the inside

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5C7qmllyFg

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JohnR725 said:

Yes I realize I'm splitting hairs here but I object to the word chronometer. Classically I think of a chronometer as a ships clock with a Detent escapement. Then a course today they refer to precision timekeeping watches as chronometers.

Then the pictures online for the Seiko Stopwatch 88-5021 All look identical to yours with an exception?  The exception is yours looks absolutely brand-new and the ones online do not. Then you even have the tag which is nice.

Then because I like seeing naked movements I found you video of the inside

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5C7qmllyFg

 

 

 

Thanks for your descriptive  response, good news and the research you have done. 

Regards joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JohnR725 said:
9 minutes ago, Geo said:

That's a very nice stopwatch that you have acquired Joe.  It should be described as a chronograph not a chronometer.

I see it also adds up the second, right a chronograph. You forgot to comment on genuineness.My web access is limited, So askng the fellow forumers seemed best option. Thanks for your response and then correction you made.

 

 

Thanks for your descriptive  response, good news and the research you have done. 

Regards joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Geo said:

That's a very nice stopwatch that you have acquired Joe.  It should be described as a chronograph not a chronometer.

Do you fly them sesna? Departure stalls always made me want to quit flying.:mad:

Regards joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have two Seitz sets, one ancient (with the 3mm anvils) and one just old (with 4mm anvils) plus a collection of spare pushers of assorted vintage. Not one of them is marked with it's size. Something which I have found very irritating when I have been using the tool and not returning pushers to their correct place in the tray every time as it means that I have to get the calipers out and measure them. These were bought as sets and collectively I have over 100 pushers so it would seem highly unlikely (if not inconceivable) that they are all cheap knock offs, especially as they are old enough to pre-date the prevalence of the Chinese knock off industry (at least as applied to watch making tools). I therefore believe them to be original Seitz parts. And there is no numbering. The shape of the bottom of the pump pushers is the same as your photo. The only thing that may not be the same is that the slotted insert (looks like a screw but is in fact a bayonet) should be brass. Yours looks the same colour as the steel but that could just be the lighting.
    • The original database is available on iOS devices here: https://apps.apple.com/fi/app/ranfft-watch-movements-archive/id6502008939
    • I no longer have my set so I can't help anymore sorry. Many on here have the set as its a must have tool for watch making/ repair.
    • It needs to be stirred before use and that makes it feel a lot thinner than when in the bottle. Does it feel as thin as 9010 after stirring it? I guess not! Yes, it's strange! I don't know, but if it is on impact it would make sense.
    • Thanks, OH! I agree with you. I'm currently looking at them under magnification, and they are consistent in shape and form for each section (flat pushers, pump pushers, concave, reamers, etc.). Though, a few are in bad condition and need to be replaced.  Before I cancel the return I have already initiated on eBay, can any of our members check to see if there are inconsistencies in markings on their sets? Also, I have included a snapshot of the bottom of one of the pump pushers, which are very unique in shape.  Can someone tell me if the bottoms of their pump pushers match this photo?  I'm hoping that Seitz had some inconsistencies in manufacturing over the years regarding markings.  Crossing my fingers. I appreciate you guys. Frank
×
×
  • Create New...