Jump to content

Will not go face when down


Recommended Posts

Hello Mates, 

Im working on a Seiko movment 7619-1020, and when I have  cleaned it and oiled it. And are doing some testing, and it runs good laying with face down, but when I flip it over, it will not gor good. And almost stop.

Some ideas where to start searching ??

 

 

20180724_180157.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, jdm said:

Do you have a timegrapher picture of when it "runs good"?

First photo is face down, second face up.

I have got it to go, with face up, when suddenley, its slowers down ...and I have to flip it over and sort of start the balance wheel again. And the it pick ups speed, and gos normal. 

Timegrapher face down.jpg

Timegrapher face up.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It shows poor amplitude and pattern even when face down. So once you take it apart again you'll have to inspect very carefully balance jewels and pivots, especially cock side. Also replacing the mainspring could improve the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jdm said:

It shows poor amplitude and pattern even when face down. So once you take it apart again you'll have to inspect very carefully balance jewels especially cock side. Also replacing the mainspring could improve the situation.

I have allready found out that the main spring must be changed, but if Im going to inspect the jevel for the balance wheel cock side. What are the criteria for no go or what to be looking for, according to what??

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, arkobugg said:

What are the criteria for no go or what to be looking for, according to what??

That all parts that have friction has to look practically as new under a strong loupe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jdm said:

That all parts that have friction has to look practically as new under a strong loupe.

And new looks like?    The hole must have nice and even ends, not jagged and the hole must be round not oval,,,,that kind of things or?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have now taken out the main spring, open the  barrel and inspected, looks ok. Put the lid on, took on of my small and strong plier, og sort og winded it up by hand some turns. And it feels strong and good. Or can a main spring be bad even if it feels good??   

Took out the jevel on the cock side, inspected in microscope. Looks like another jevels I have come a cross by doing service, dont know realy what I should be looking for??

Some with some good ideas?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look for a worn spot or pit in the centre of the jewel. 

But I still think you are most likely to have an oscillator problem as your rate varies significantly between DU and DD. How does the hairspring look?

One other quick thing to check is your balance end shake. This can affect the interface between the impulse pin and pallets in extreme cases, but is less likely to be an issue on a newer watch like this. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I did not realise is that the second timegrapher photo only shows “good” amplitude because it is immediately when the watch is flipped over to DU. 

In which case carry on looking for sources of friction such as the balance end stone, balance jewel hole (is it cracked?) and end shake. 

Edited by rodabod
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Is one pivot shorter than the other? 

At this point, you have no access to the mainplate jewel , incab, you should see the pivots just sticking out from the jewels when you remove the cabs one at a time.

What is the end shake?  

My question for @jdm is, can you tell from the graph if the fork is hitting the roller plate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pivot at bridge is likely to be shrot, with it,s cab removed you should see pivot's tip appear and barely above the jewel hole.

A regular test now is to lift one side of the wheel see if the pivot slides out of the jewels.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Might that be the viscous nature of oil resisting gravity H  ,  we have been comparing water and hydrophobic surfaces which are similar in principle but water is much less viscous than oil. I guess what we trying to discover is if epilame also has an adhesive trait as well as being oleophobic. Plus the oil dropet has very little mass for gravity to work on, like watching tiny water beads that can grip onto vertical glass until they are connected together to increase their mass then run down. 
    • But it also makes it seem less susceptible to gravity. If you place a droplet of oil on an epilame-treated surface the droplet of oil will still stay in place even if you then flip the surface from a horizontal to a vertical position. That is, the oil droplet remains anchored, and that's the purpose of epilame. If it was just a matter of creating an oleophobic surface we could probably use other, less expensive, methods!? I don't know @Waggy but my gut feeling tells me you're spot on (pun intended!). I believe the oleophobic property is a side effect of epilame which is designed to keep the oil anchored.
    • Saturday morning 27/4 Sunday evening 28/4 Monday evening 29/4 Floor has a drain in the middle so I am hoping that there is very little fall on it, if any. Room is about 2.5 x 2.5 metres square. Can only use about 1/2 of one wall on the right of the pictures which has a sliding glass door in it. And only about 3/4 of the wall to the left of the pictures as it has the door to the house in it. Progress. 🙂 
    • This makes much more sense now, the oil is withdrawing itself to make as little contact with the epilame as possible. Same principle as wax on a car creates a hyrophobic surface that makes the cohesive properties of water molecules pull together.  The water beads run off only when under the influence of gravity but still remain cohesively beaded up. And as mentioned earlier a pivot would keep the oil in place on a cap jewel.  Epilame on an escapement would be a different scenario, there is nothing to hold the oil in position if gravity tugs at the bead to move, plus the escape teeth pull the oil about Maybe this is why its suggested to run the watch for a short while to remove the epilame to make two oleophobic surfaces either side of the oil, creating a ring of fire 🔥 around it 😅 The oil is repelled by every surface of the epilame even that which it sits upon. So the oil pulls together to make as little contact with it as possible, but the oil cant float above that area, it can only sit there on top of it. Under gravity the oil could potentially run away as an oil bead, unless the epilame has an adhesive property which i dont think it does ? So something else keeps it in position ie a pivot under a cap jewel . But that isn't the case in a pallet jewel situation. 
    • As with every skill it watchmaking, it takes practice. Notice at the top of the document it says, "Practical work - 40 hours".  I can get the balance wheels 'close enough' to flat, but never seem to get them perfect. Same with gear wheels. Guess I need more practice.
×
×
  • Create New...