Jump to content

Anyone recognize this vintage automobile side marker light?


Recommended Posts

Picked up a pair of vintage side marker lights at a fleamarket recently for around USD5.

It's marked LEP which I guess is Lucas Electric (Parts?)? But on most Lucas items I usually see Made in England marked somewhere but not on this one, perhaps the small size was a factor.

Body is heavy,  probably chromed brass so I guess it would be pre WW2 or at least a pre WW2 design.  The red plastic would be an indicator to show if the light was working. 

Anyone have an idea what car (or bike)  they would have fitted originally? IMG20180503151851.thumb.jpg.e7f15d9f2872d0b5131ee1fbe030505b.jpgIMG20180503151908.thumb.jpg.4e37ea1ec6e77af362d3bb75979e133b.jpgIMG20180503152035.thumb.jpg.c9ce94a88e7ce60c5ba2a36d8d2cf379.jpgIMG20180503152332.thumb.jpg.01c6c1c2dd59d3ff90d92c17104c0aa4.jpg

anilv

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, anilv said:

Picked up a pair of vintage side marker lights at a fleamarket recently for around USD5.

It's marked LEP which I guess is Lucas Electric (Parts?)? But on most Lucas items I usually see Made in England marked somewhere but not on this one, perhaps the small size was a factor.

Body is heavy,  probably chromed brass so I guess it would be pre WW2 or at least a pre WW2 design.  The red plastic would be an indicator to show if the light was working. 

Anyone have an idea what car (or bike)  they would have fitted originally? IMG20180503151851.thumb.jpg.e7f15d9f2872d0b5131ee1fbe030505b.jpgIMG20180503151908.thumb.jpg.4e37ea1ec6e77af362d3bb75979e133b.jpgIMG20180503152035.thumb.jpg.c9ce94a88e7ce60c5ba2a36d8d2cf379.jpgIMG20180503152332.thumb.jpg.01c6c1c2dd59d3ff90d92c17104c0aa4.jpg

anilv

These are called LEP  pilot lights made for lucas norton &  triumph motercycles

 

 

lep lamp (Medium).jpeg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, anilv said:

Picked up a pair of vintage side marker lights at a fleamarket recently for around USD5.

It's marked LEP which I guess is Lucas Electric (Parts?)? But on most Lucas items I usually see Made in England marked somewhere but not on this one, perhaps the small size was a factor.

Body is heavy,  probably chromed brass so I guess it would be pre WW2 or at least a pre WW2 design.  The red plastic would be an indicator to show if the light was working. 

Anyone have an idea what car (or bike)  they would have fitted originally? IMG20180503151851.thumb.jpg.e7f15d9f2872d0b5131ee1fbe030505b.jpgIMG20180503151908.thumb.jpg.4e37ea1ec6e77af362d3bb75979e133b.jpgIMG20180503152035.thumb.jpg.c9ce94a88e7ce60c5ba2a36d8d2cf379.jpgIMG20180503152332.thumb.jpg.01c6c1c2dd59d3ff90d92c17104c0aa4.jpg

anilv

   my guess;   vintage aftermarket.  european.  vin

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

These look like Lucas side markers either original or repro. These were fitted to a wide range of British cars and commercial vehicles in the thirties and forties.
These were often used to provided a sidelight but also as a direction indicator in later years.

Neil


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That will mean dismantling the gear train, which with 5 pivots to align was a pain. Probably going to have to though. I'm convinced it's something to do with the great wheel. 
    • As far as I know, the only time an epilame treatment has potential drawbacks is when something is rubbing on the treated part w/o lubrication in between creating abrasive dust. That is, I don't believe in the method of "running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed". So, I think the rule would be; do not epilame treat parts where rubbing is going on without lubrication. Other than that I don't think we have anything to worry about. That said, I'm not an expert, and I'm always happy to learn more. Has any other repairer than Alex suggested or explained the "making-a-groove" method? My impression is that it's just something he constructed in his mind. I have not perceived it as a generally practiced method. Again, I could be wrong!
    • Post some pictures , some good close ones of the parts you've described. 
    • Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. If its a potential problem for amateurs to use then i would prefer not to take the risk .
    • Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always.    ETA - the parts list calls it the Great Wheel, not second wheel. 
×
×
  • Create New...