Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Not a question, but something I've learned that may be useful to others.

After cleaning an Omega 1012 the amplitude was low and all over the place - fluctuating between 220 and 240 deg. I couldn't get it any higher.  

The jewels, gear train, balance all look good.  

It took me a long time to identify the problem - I wasn't checking the gear train with the sweep seconds pinion fitted.
As soon as I fitted that, the problem was clear - too much tension on the friction spring (the spring pushes down on the pinion).

I knew the wrong pressure from the spring would make a difference, but I didn't realise how much. 

Now the amplitude is 280-290 deg. 

Another lesson learnt

media (3).jpg

  • Like 4
Posted

Yep, been in a similar situation with a different type of movement but same concept... Mine only made some weird noises and the seconds hand would stutter at times.

Why did they have to make watches so fiddly and complicated sometimes ? ^_^

Posted
1 hour ago, Chopin said:

Yep, been in a similar situation with a different type of movement but same concept... Mine only made some weird noises and the seconds hand would stutter at times.

Why did they have to make watches so fiddly and complicated sometimes ? ^_^

It does seem a weakness in the design, being so sensitive to the spring tension.

I've also had problems with the springs which push up not having enough tension, and the second hand slipper/stuttering. 

And the slightest tweek to the spring and the damn things break :thumbsd: 

Posted

It’s worthnoting the change in amplitude when the spring is fitted; it should just drop slightly when fitted. Say, as a rough ballpark, maybe 5 or 10 degrees. It need to be enough to eradicate shake on the pinion drive. 

Posted
1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

You are learning fast grasshopper.:D

I'm learning, but not that fast - I had it in pieces 3 times before I found the error !

But persistence in finding errors is worth it You don't forget what you've learned the hard way.

A Smiths Imperial did try my patience recently - I had in in pieces 4 times before I discovered that it was the "new" mainspring I'd fitted that was useless  - not springy !  

Posted
I'm learning, but not that fast - I had it in pieces 3 times before I found the error !
But persistence in finding errors is worth it You don't forget what you've learned the hard way.
A Smiths Imperial did try my patience recently - I had in in pieces 4 times before I discovered that it was the "new" mainspring I'd fitted that was useless  - not springy !  

The more I learn, the more I realise I know very little. It’s a depressing thought [emoji3]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • 2 years later...
Posted

hi,

what the function of the sweep second pinion of Omega cal. 565 is please ?

is there sweep second pinion in Omega cal. 552 ?

My issue is that my Omega cal.565 stops every time I shake my hand, but it seems that the movement is not stopping, because watch is not losing time. Is that normal ?

Also,  is it the same for Omega Cal. 552 ?

I had same Omega before,  I don't remember second hand stoping that often from minor shake. The movement is supposed to be serviced,  so just wondering if that's normal

thank you

  • 4 years later...
Posted

Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :)

I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it.

Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again.

Cheers

second-pinion-spring.jpg.a5e2c261a5e2032ee80d9791996b5d7d.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

Once you are aware of the problem, you can adjust as necessary.

I have a couple of the Omega 10xx, and they are not my favourites. They seem a bit flimsy and not as solid as previous generation Omega. But I think that's true of a lot of movements from the 70-80s. For me, the 50-60s is the peak in watch movements, where the design criteria was quality, not saving the last penny.

  • Like 3
Posted
12 hours ago, TimeWerks said:

I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :)

It makes you wonder who worked on the watch before you and why the spring is bent out of shape? Then there's the other strange problem of the pinion? The parts listing for this watch the image that part is not quality at all

image.png.c7ab6d4aa52c7d1d804957fac470fb5f.png

It would be really nice to find a picture of the part in the original package but this is an image I found online

image.png.e5670bd66728f86add8590b6cdde2fb8.png

Then what was bothering me was here is an image from a 1012 and you'll notice the spring set up is entirely different? So wonderful ever modified your spring did something to the pinion also? But again it's it is working maybe it's fine

image.png.219a8ec84bd75da8e3de507938528452.png

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

There were things bothering me about this discussion that took me a while to figure out the problem. In the image below it appears to be the spring may be pushing up? Normally when Omega has a spring pushing up the pinion has a pivot with a bridge to hold it in place so in other words the spring can push on something that stationary as opposed to this which appears to be floating?

image.png.93c9f0b29b610c8e837376ee09958113.png

To understand the problem with the above image we need another image of side view which I have below. In my image down below on the left-hand side it agrees with the image up above. But the only problem is the left-hand side is defective and the right-hand side image is the way it's supposed to look.

image.png.9dd79e082911add773dc5997ea70480e.png

Then Omega if you can access the right documents does explain how and why this problem occurs. With the pinion floating around it might be assumed that you support it when putting on all the hands but you do not because as noted below if you do this small bush on the pinion will relocate out of position exactly what we see in the image up above.

image.png.7e303477e1710f7420b1c14bf8656719.png

 

Then Omega does not mention this but there is a possibility of also damaging the pinion and causing the bush to move to where it's not supposed to be when removing the hands. 

 

Edited by JohnR725
  • Like 5
Posted
13 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

There were things bothering me about this discussion that took me a while to figure out the problem. In the image below it appears to be the spring may be pushing up?

Well spotted John. Yes your spring is incorrect @TimeWerks, it should be pushing the pinion down in to the mainplate as shown in @JohnR725's pic, not up as you show it.

image.png.58fe86e3cb5b5636829daf771782f3c3.png

 

13 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Normally when Omega has a spring pushing up the pinion has a pivot with a bridge to hold it in place

Just yesterday I was disassembling an Omega cal 601. The spring is pushing UP on the pinion, but the pinion has a pivot and own little bridge (actually a cock). 

image.thumb.png.a6fb76ca3a0d77e8712336af69727515.png 

image.png.d9a25b28b149727493bf47ab5cace041.png

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
On 4/23/2018 at 10:27 AM, mikepilk said:

(the spring pushes down on the pinion)

Hmm... In the picture, it looks like the spring pushes on the side of the pinion. In the Vostok 24xx movements, the spring pushes down on top of the pinion. That is, the Vostok pinion is not visible from above as it is in your picture. Perhaps the Omega spring presses on a round tab fitted on the arbor just under the pinion?

EDIT:
Had a better look at the following posts, and the answer is yes!

Edited by VWatchie
Posted
3 hours ago, VWatchie said:

Perhaps the Omega spring presses on a round tab fitted on the arbor just under the pinion?

They can go over, under, or around (fork shaped) depending on the movement. You can see all types in the following thread, where I was asking how to support the pinion when fitting the seconds hand when the spring sits on top of the pinion (on a Longines 30LS).

 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's a disease. After you get the donor, you'll want to repair that too.
    • Ha! Definitely not profit. It's more than I appreciate the intricacies and want to challenge myself with something different.  Good idea, you always see lots of quartz watches. It's a cheap way to enter the lottery and maybe find something good. 
    • Actually, I finally did both. I bought a digital caliper that measured 0.9 mm for the screws. And I bought a spare movement, without case, but with both clamps & screws. It will arrive in a few weeks. And, when searching for these screws, I found exactly the same russian watch I am trying to repair, in good condition, and for a bargain price (see photo). I bought it as well, but I will repair the other one anyway. The travel is the journey ! I keep going ...
    • See blued srews on a genuine Rolex (Fig. 12): http://people.timezone.com/mdisher/andrewb/3135/3135_1.htm and here: https://www.chrono24.de/rolex/werk-komplett-rolex-3135---complete-movement--calibre-3135---genuine-rolex---fully-working--id29910928.htm
    • That's what I'm hoping and believe, and why I wanted to discuss it with you. No, I'm being dead serious! What made you think I was kidding? It's a sincere question. What puzzles me is that only the top of the screw head is blued (see image in my previous post or below). Not even the screw slot is blued! In my opinion, it looks "Chinese-cheap" and not what I would associate with Rolex. Hence, it awakened my suspicion that something might be wrong. Neither have I! I never paid much attention to all of those videos on YouTube explaining how to tell a fake and genuine Rolex movement apart, as I thought the escapement would be a dead giveaway. After all, who would be willing to pay for a fake free sprung balance with a Breguet hairspring and micro stella regulation, and having the insane precision that a genuine Rolex 3135 has? Looking at the timing machine results (my first post), I had no doubt whatsoever that I was dealing with the real McCoy. So @rehajm, are you telling us we're looking at a fake Rolex free sprung balance with a Breguet hairspring, micro stella regulation and KIF shock protection? If so, we were wrong to assume that we would never see that in a Chinese clone. Ay caramba! 😱 So, what's the giveaway? I get your point, John. It makes zero sense! But did you notice how both the original eBay screws and the generic screws are completely blued. The ones I found to hold the date indicator seating in place were only partly blued? Let me show you the picture again: Makes you wonder if the Rolex screwmaker had a bad day or didn't understand the specification, as it was not written in Mandarin. So, what's the verdict? Am I dealing with a genuine Rolex 3135 or a Chinese super clone? If you don't know or you're not sure, please feel free to take a guess! Here is a link to the first 100 pictures I've taken during the disassembly: https://1drv.ms/f/c/5643825a9f286b75/EpbF5n_qRCREvohfgbcZ4l4B0eUcw2h62xqmPYtdPzQ-QA?e=QIwcN0
×
×
  • Create New...