Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'd really appreciate your opinions on the following.

I've just started the "Level 2: Maintenance Servicing" course on https://www.watchrepairlessons.com. Before this I have successfully serviced about a dozen Russian Vostok movements (2409, 2414, 2415) so my choice of movement for following the course is probably not critical as long as it is a manual movement without any complications.

Anyway, I wish to follow along as closely as possible so I've decided to pick up the same kind of movement  as used in the course. My idea is that once I'm finished with the course I will build my own watch around the movement like Mark Lovick shows in this video.

39593429694_3407bc9107.jpg

Now, I can't make up my mind whether to buy a Chinese clone like the one in the image above available on cousinsuk.com (CODE: CHI3620M) and of course on eBay (I suppose) or...

39593429504_d220474199.jpg

whether I should go with the above "Nastrix" movement found in a pocket watch on eBay.

To me the "Nastrix" movement looks "more attractive" (I wonder what alloy that is?). I think it would look better inside my own watch as I have a glass case back in mind. I have negotiated the price to about £61 for the Nastrix which is quite a bit  more than the £36 for the Chinese clone. The following info is from the ad on eBay, and from my mail correspondence with the seller:

"
(---)in pristine condition--never, ever used. BRAND NEW!(---) This has the highly reliable, full size ETA6497 movement. (---)

Movement is approx. 36.70mm; that would be American size 8; 16 lignes. Case is 48.95mm approx.
The movement is stamped "Nastrix Corp, Seventeen Unadjusted", and "17 Jewels SWISS".
If you look inside this watch at the movement, you will find that it is a 17 jewel incablock made by "Nastrix." These were made by a man called Claude Wollman in Swizterland between 1970 and 1990. Arnex was the name of the manufacturer. Other good names which exist for these watches are Neiman Marcus, Kellner, La Cloche, Bucherer, and others. There is a good article on these watches which you can find on Google called "What is the value of an Arnex Pocket Watch." The article is not exactly clear about the cases. But the parts are Swiss and under a special treaty to keep US labor in the US they may have been assembled in the US Virgin Islands (St Croix.) A most convoluted history.

"
Really can't make up my mind so I'd really appreciate some input on this! Would the Nastrix be a as good as the Chinese clone, or is this a scam? I should mention that the seller has 100 % positive feedback.

 

Edited by VWatchie
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, jdm said:

if the small price difference is not important to you, my recommendation would be for the original Swiss mov.t (Unitas),

Seagull grades their mov.t, and the cheapest ones are prone that nasty problems. read:

http://www.asian-watches.com/2016/04/a-warning-about-seagull-st-3600-vs-eta.html 

The 6497 is made by both ETA and Unitas, Yes?  Good information in that linked article on movements leaving factory without lubrication.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your input! It certainly helped me make up my mind. I hadn't even noticed the KIF spings on the Chinese movement. I just assumed it would be identical (as it's called a clone) with the Unitas 6498. Now I know better, thanks! The Russian watches that I've been servicing/repairing so far have a similar spring (I guess) and they too break easily and can sometimes be a pain to refit.

While researching this I also found this article called "Buy a Swiss ETA / Unitas 6497 or 6498 Movement For Well Under $100" which was also helpful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those Arnex produced pocket watches are a great source of 6497/6498 movements, but I'm afraid the word has gotten out and the prices have marched right up!

I too would go for the Swiss one versus the Chinese one if the diff. in price is not bothersome.

Cheers!

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mark keeps a close eye on his forum. I'm sure if you asked him he will reply, he might not do it right away but you will receive his answer.  
    • I kind of think the same, the surface under the oil is the same as the surface around the oil. Can epilame both repel and attract , that doesn't quite make sense in simple terms, but is it more complicated than that. When cohesive forces within a liquid are stronger than the adhesive forces of a surface then surface tension is high causing the liquid to bead up. So  an applied epilame coating reduces the adhesive force of a surface inhibiting a fluid to wet the surface. So i guess no epilame cannot both repel and attract . If something is keeping the oil in place on top of an epilamed surface then there must be another reason for that.
    • I agree with @JohnR725. Oil on an epilamed surface is essentially the same as water on a waxed surface. The same physical properties are at work (surface tension vs. adhesion). 
    • I think we all get a lot out of this group, and it has been pivotal in my development by the sharing of knowledge, experience and learning from more seasoned experts such as @JohnR725 and others (you know who you are!) as well as fellow novices. I think that having a backup communication plan in reserve so that if there is a future problem just makes good sense. I don't think anyone is trying to undermine the forum, but if something unthinkable happens, like the Ranfft website for example, then it would be good if those who are willing can still keep in contact. Speaking personally, and I know I risk a charge of heresy, it would be good if Mark could be a little more visible in this forum, and maybe give any insight from time to time on the future/progress of forum and instructional videos etc. even if its just to confirm the status quo. I appreciate he is a busy man with a full time job, but so are most of the rest of us and to post a few lines every now and then shouldn't be too much to ask to reassure the restless villagers. Best outcome for me would be a message saying something along the lines of: "Hi guys, all good, no planned changes... enjoy the forum, will message again next month!" Just my two cents.
    • A nice looking watch !! Did you try 9010, instead of the 9415, on the pallet jewels / escape wheel? And if you did, did you notice a difference?
×
×
  • Create New...