Jump to content

ETA 2824 Hairspring


Scouseget

Recommended Posts

Hi all from frigid Edmonton; currently minus 30 degrees - but it promises to warm up around May so it's not too bad really!PC294745.thumb.JPG.deaeaef0784ec43e429a458852d3b829.JPGPC294746.thumb.JPG.ff6ca61e5dfda8eeb0dcfb0b739b4390.JPG

I'm currently working on an ETA 2824-2 movement and removed the hairspring to untangle it (another story for another day), which I managed to do successfully. Unfortunately I'm having a real problem reinstalling the hairspring back on the cock as the stud is actually held in a really tight fork, rather than by the more normal method of locking the stud in with a small screw. The fork is really tight and I'm sure they use a special tool at the factory for this, one that expands slightly to spring the fork open a bit. Alas I have no such tool and despite my best efforts, cannot persuade the stud to seat itself back into the fork without the risk of doing irreparable harm to the spring. FYI, I was able to wedge the stud out of the fork by judicious use of tweezers but no such option is available for reinstalling it. 

As always, your help will be very much appreciated. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A similar subject has come up before unfortunately it involved the removal aspect. If the link doesn't help just do a search for Etachron there are quite a few other discussions somebody probably has how to put the stud back in without bad things happening.

https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/997-stud-removal-techniques-for-the-eta-chron-system-eg-2824-2/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the past I have mentioned this problem in relation to the system used by Seiko, which is is virtually the same. I've got various suggestions about the tool to use but none risolutive. Seiko manual recommends "sturdy tweezers" with the cock installed, but that proved very difficult for me. I imagine that a special fixture which holds the parts precisely is used at the factory. Sorry if I can't be more useful but that's still an open issue for me too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, I do not have an easy answer but I have fixed a Seiko by juduciously and very carefully using a fine screwdriver to expand the fork  with the cock installed after tearing my eyes out to sort the hairspring,  de-gauss straighten,   etc. The bead did seat OK when the fork was released a little. That is all I can offer. there are people here that will offer advice I expect but it is a "hands on" job. Regards, Mike.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, clockboy said:

I have seen a vid (forget where) & the guy uses a small screw to open the fork installs the stud & just unscrews to release the fork.

I think that's the vid for vostock hairspring removal, but no reason why a small screw couldn't be adapted and used for ETA movements,

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's the vid for vostock hairspring removal, but no reason why a small screw couldn't be adapted and used for ETA movements,
 
Why do manufacturers use this system? A screw is simpler imo.

Maybe it's easier to automate manufacturing if you remove sideways screws? So you can jig the part and do everything on one side.

Sent from my KFGIWI using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, dieale2 said:

Why do manufacturers use this system? A screw is simpler imo.

They use a system like this because it's much much easier to adjust.

So Seiko makes it look so simple it probably Is not really that simple. So I'm attaching a Seiko Tech guide Page 15 shows reassembly. Pages 24 and 25 terminology and how to adjust. Then Seiko is assuming that the balance wheel didn't have the hairspring untangled and things might get more interesting if everything isn't exactly where it's supposed to be. In other words the kind of things that happen when untangling a hairspring Is very likely going to make this much more complicated.

 

seiko_02036R20A.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

They use a system like this because it's much much easier to adjust.

Adjustment is done on the regulator only, but we're talking about the end stud, which in theory does not need to be touched ever after assembly. Nothing but cost reduction would prevent it being kept in place with a screw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, wls1971 said:

I think that's the vid for vostock hairspring removal, but no reason why a small screw couldn't be adapted and used for ETA movements,

 

I really do appreciate it when people share videos to help others, whether it be watch repairing or otherwise. However, some of the American ones are so incredibly slow to get to the point! You use a screw to force open the stud holder. Got it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I read that same article last night  H.  I think epilame is too much headache for me, sources aren't always accurate, some conflicting. Such is the GRAVITY of this situation, Is it ok if i just STICK  to a thixotropic oil 🤣
    • Not sure I follow along. As I stated in one of my previous posts, the epilame will remain intact between rubbing parts as long as the surface is lubricated by oil or grease. Maybe it's just a coincidence, but note how the epilame-treated surface is illustrated in @Waggy's post. It looks like the oil is exposed to a binder (epilame!) so that it can't move sideways.
    • The epilame under the oil will also be removed  Unless the oil makes a barrier between the epilame and the escape teeth 😅 I think i need two strong coffees now 🤣
    • If we use the rub-off epilame method of pallet stones (run dry for a few minutes before applying the epilame) where will the oil go/be transported when it is pushed away from the impulse surface by the escape wheel teeth? Onto the epilame-treated sections of the pallet! Once the oil has been applied/transported to the epilame-treated sections of the pallet where will it then go? Nowhere as the oil will remain on the epilame. So, perhaps the run-dry method defeats its intended purpose leaving the pallet impulse surfaces dry!? If, on the other hand, we do not remove the epilame from the pallet stones where the escape wheel teeth come in contact with them I'd expect more oil to remain where we want it and need it. Yes, I agree, that is the question, and my gut feeling tells me that is exactly the case. Epilame was created to have an adhesive trait and the oleophobic property is just a side effect.  
    • Might that be the viscous nature of oil resisting gravity H  ,  we have been comparing water and hydrophobic surfaces which are similar in principle but water is much less viscous than oil. I guess what we trying to discover is if epilame also has an adhesive trait as well as being oleophobic. Plus the oil dropet has very little mass for gravity to work on, like watching tiny water beads that can grip onto vertical glass until they are connected together to increase their mass then run down. Gravity isn't the only factor at play when oil is placed on pallet stones. The oil receives a lot of bashing that may push it out of position ? Thinking about it if the oil stays in position for 10 minutes enough time for the escape wheel to scrape off the epilame , then  a walled in lubrication has been achieved,  the epilame is no longer beneath the oil ( possibly mixed into the oil )
×
×
  • Create New...