Jump to content

Help with barrel arbor


Recommended Posts

I have a broken barrel arbor from a pocket watch, one of the early 20th century, low cost ones as far as I can tell.  As per the second photo, there is a square section broken off.  The section mates with a mechanism I believe limits the number of turns of the barrel.  I plan to make a new barrel arbor, I know the watch is cheap and probably not worth it, but its about building skills.

Anyway, my question is, would you at all expect that the larger diameter section with the tab for the spring is pressed onto the shaft? it sort of looks like it is, but a a few light taps didn't dislodge it.  It would make things a great deal easier if i didn't have to make that aspect of it.  Thanks in advance.

1Oaqr4p.jpg

AQ3jRyA.jpg

 

 

 

 

Edited by measuretwice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, measuretwice said:

I plan to make a new barrel arbor, 

Do you have a lathe and mill? Making such a small and complex part is a very advanced task for today's (low) standards of watchmaking.

Edited by jdm
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, jdm said:

Making such a small and complex part is a very advanced task

We'll see, no promises, but it seems a fairly straight forward turning job (famous last words, right?)  Its smaller than I'm used to, but I've lots of lathes and mills and time on them and its a lot larger than stuff like balance staff pivots.

Any idea if this part comes apart?

Edited by measuretwice
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's pressed on it probably is pressed on by heating one of the parts and the other one is cold. Making a very tight fit. No idea how to remove them thought. 

Todays watchmakers is probably not into making parts like this but the machines of today

 would be much better.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@measuretwice The barrel arbor hooking isn't pressed on- it is machined integral to the piece.. don't pick at it any further! This piece would take a GOOD couple of hours to draw up, machine, modify to fit,  heat treat and polish. 

@jdm Yes- me! 12 yrs working with Schaublin 70's (alongside other nice machinery) every day as a precision prototype engineer for industry.  (also an MBHI watchmaker)

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lambchop said:

 

@jdm Yes- me! 12 yrs working with Schaublin 70's (alongside other nice machinery) every day as a precision prototype engineer for industry.  (also an MBHI watchmaker)

Will love to see your work posted here! So far the only one that consistently does that is szbalogh, and he doesn't even have a lathe!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, jdm said:

Do you know of many watch repairers that do lathe work these days? Or even on this forum?

I have a lathe (Star) but not a milling machine. Not many members have lathes because of the extra space required. There are however plenty of watchmakers who still make watch parts, balance staffs etc. If you purchase a BHI mag in the ads section there are many offering their services.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, clockboy said:

There are however plenty of watchmakers who still make watch parts, balance staffs etc. If you purchase a BHI mag in the ads section there are many offering their services.

That must be in the UK, a country that is ahead when it comes to small manufacturing and services. In my country I've seen "watch repairers" not taking work that consisted in pushing out a broken bracelet pin from a Swiss watch. As mentioned, this is an age of replacing watch parts, if that much even. If this forum can teach and show otherwise, then it will become a real asset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a big difference between a watch repairer and a watchmaker. A qualified watchmaker providing he/she have the correct tools would be able to make the part. A qualified watch repairer would find it extremely difficult even with the tools.   

I learned my trade and became a watchmaker clockmaker. I was lucky the workshop was set up to make parts.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks for help, one piece it is.   From sure one piece makes the job more challenging.   I didn't mean to sound flippant on making it but I've been machining for a long time and have a lot of equipment so pretty much any part is just a matter of figuring out the sequence of events and work holding.  The challenge of this stuff is everything is so small which creates new challenges (perhaps why I'm attracted to it)

I've a small BCA mill/jig borer that would be ideal (has a built in rotary table), but its currently apart as I'm making a new spindle for it (hardened and ground with super precision bearings).  In the middle of that, the internal grinder needed a rebuild, then I felt the motor needed balancing so started working on an acelerometer based dynamic balancing thing, blah blah blah.  Story of my hobby life, make something to make something else in seemingly endless spiral.  But, its all just for fun and learning not money, else the part would most definitely not be worth it and I'd spend the weekend watching sports like normal people.

I'll either wait until the BCA is done, or make a small collet block to take 8 or 10 mm collets and set it up on a rotary table on a full sized mill.  Thanks again for the help!

 

 

Edited by measuretwice
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Update: I posted over on NAWCC and it looks like I melted the fine coil wires where they come into the solder lugs. After dropping the heat way down on my iron and being absurdly careful, I have a humming fork!
    • Hell0 @nevenbekriev. Thank you for your advice. I have removed the old setting using my staking set--I will keep the KIF spring, since it is still good.  I am awaiting the replacement setting, and will update when I do that. In the mean time, I looked at the escape wheel and it looks ok. What do you think?    
    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
×
×
  • Create New...