Jump to content

Double Balance wheel WTF!


Recommended Posts

I hope this is the right place to post this question?

But how does this even work ..is it just there for show? it's hard to tell from the photo's but looks like there is no escape wheel on the right balance but there is one under the left balance?

http://www.good-stuffs.com/Shanghai-Diamond-double-skeleton-flying-wheels-automatic-watch_p_296.html

Edited by SteveT
typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you look closely, there is an escape wheel driving the right hand balance wheel.  The top jewel for it is below and to the right of the wheel just showing under the dial.  It's very much a cheap gimmick!

 

IMG_3228.PNG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if this particular application of dual oscillators is simply cosmetic or if it is actually properly designed to take advantage of resonance, a phenomenon which is used in multiple oscillator time pieces to improve the stability (and therefore the accuracy) of the oscillating system. Multi-pendulum clocks have been around for a while, have a read of this;

doublependulumclocks.pdf

The oscillators don't have to be pendulums though, balance wheels do the same thing and the principal has been used in some pretty high end watches;

http://www.luxuo.com/style/watches/why-two-balance-springs-are-better-than-one.html

So in theory there is a potential advantage to be had by using two balances in a wrist watch. In practice though I wonder if the trade off between additional friction within the system (resulting from more wheels, pivots, etc) and the improved stability actually results in any discernable benefit, especially in a movement which has been mass produced down to a price rather that precision engineered to the highest standards. I don't doubt that the use of multiple oscillators in high end movements which are made to the finest tolerances can be shown to impart some benefit. However, in the watch in @SteveT's  post I suspect that variation in the fit of all of the individual components due to the manufacturing tolerances more than wipes out any possible improvement, making this, as @Geoso succinctly puts it "a cheap gimmick!"

It is however an interesting principal.

I would love to see someone try and put together a 4 balance system using cylindrical hair springs, each mounted in a 3 axis tourbillon, just for the sheer overkill of it!!

Edited by Marc
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 years later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
    • Oh well, if Master @nickelsilver says it's the way to go, then it is the way to go! I stand corrected! 🫡 Are there any other places where you're supposed to remove the epilame from the contact point of rubbing? I don't think so! Thanks for the effort @Neverenoughwatches, much appreciated! 🙂👍
×
×
  • Create New...