Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi, I wanted to ask around here before attempting to lubricate the shock setting on this watch. It's got an odd assembly that I wasn't able to find online and I'm unsure of how to take it apart. This comes from an FHF 1686 movement.

Any help with identifying this shock setting and subsequent disassembly help would be appreciated!

PXL_20240111_043254584.thumb.jpg.60896e030df6946ae63aeb16c13d908b.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neat, I've never seen one like that. It looks to me basically like a circlip, where you need to squeeze the prongs together. I'd get my fine tweezers in one of the holes and push towards the center.

Looks like a serious candidate to join the Swiss Space Program, so maybe take precautions with some Rodico or a plastic baggie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, donutdan said:

Hi, I wanted to ask around here before attempting to lubricate the shock setting on this watch. It's got an odd assembly that I wasn't able to find online and I'm unsure of how to take it apart. This comes from an FHF 1686 movement.

Any help with identifying this shock setting and subsequent disassembly help would be appreciated!

PXL_20240111_043254584.thumb.jpg.60896e030df6946ae63aeb16c13d908b.jpg

Its a swiss bal. shock spring. Stabil, it should operate like a lyre spring. If you can post a clearer closer photo.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/10/2024 at 11:40 PM, donutdan said:

Hi, I wanted to ask around here before attempting to lubricate the shock setting on this watch. It's got an odd assembly that I wasn't able to find online and I'm unsure of how to take it apart. This comes from an FHF 1686 movement.

Any help with identifying this shock setting and subsequent disassembly help would be appreciated!

PXL_20240111_043254584.thumb.jpg.60896e030df6946ae63aeb16c13d908b.jpg

As a quick update, I was unable to remove either of the shock setting springs. I think they do have a similar structure to a lyre shaped spring as suggested but the "prongs" are just too wide to be unseated through the provided gap.

Any suggestions where I could find more info on this assembly? At present, I don't know how someone would be able to service these without a specialized tool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 If you seperate the balance  complete   from balance cock, removing the stud and regulator arm would reveal whats  hiding  , you see how its structured thus are likely to figure out how to get the sucker removed. Just an idea.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, donutdan said:

As a quick update, I was unable to remove either of the shock setting springs. I think they do have a similar structure to a lyre shaped spring as suggested but the "prongs" are just too wide to be unseated through the provided gap.

Any suggestions where I could find more info on this assembly? At present, I don't know how someone would be able to service these without a specialized tool.

Is the width of just one arm wider than the space provided to remove it ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Is the width of just one arm wider than the space provided to remove it ?

I think it's only 1.5 the width or less. If I try to remove one arm, the other blocks it preventing it from being removed. I've also tried pushing the spring to different positions to give more clearance but my attempts have been unsuccessful unfortunately.

I may try as Nucejoe suggested although it looks like the shock setting is press fit into place. I don't own a jeweling press nor have I used one but I don't mind just shelving this project until a later date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, donutdan said:

I think it's only 1.5 the width or less. If I try to remove one arm, the other blocks it preventing it from being removed. I've also tried pushing the spring to different positions to give more clearance but my attempts have been unsuccessful unfortunately.

I may try as Nucejoe suggested although it looks like the shock setting is press fit into place. I don't own a jeweling press nor have I used one but I don't mind just shelving this project until a later date.

You might be able to lift one arm up and over the other as you push it out of the slot. Obviously dont force anything and use good magnification so you can see how much space and tension there is between the two arms. Good luck🤞 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

You might be able to lift one arm up and over the other as you push it out of the slot. Obviously dont force anything and use good magnification so you can see how much space and tension there is between the two arms. Good luck🤞 

We have success! I was able to service the shock setting finally and the watch went from running at +100 s/day to only -9! The tolerances are significantly tighter than in incabloc springs and it was difficult to see even if the spring was unseated or not. I'm still curious about what this shock setting is called but for now I'm willing to just accept this small victory.

PXL_20240115_041301730.jpg

PXL_20240115_041311433.jpg

PXL_20240115_041411769.jpg

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, donutdan said:

We have success! I was able to service the shock setting finally and the watch went from running at +100 s/day to only -9! The tolerances are significantly tighter than in incabloc springs and it was difficult to see even if the spring was unseated or not. I'm still curious about what this shock setting is called but for now I'm willing to just accept this small victory.

PXL_20240115_041301730.jpg

PXL_20240115_041311433.jpg

PXL_20240115_041411769.jpg

The design is as i mentioned earlier Stabil 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
21 minutes ago, Burruz said:

Just out of interest would it be appropriate to carefully remove some material between the jaws (folded 1000grit?) to allow easier access next time or is that not acceptable?

🤔 that would be altering the design that folks put thousands of hours into.   I say go for it 😆

Lol maybe not, it would undoubtedly weaken the spring. We try what we try and we take the consequences that go with the attempt. Generally ( i just love that word , its a  🤔  might, should, could kinda word.) altering a design in a way that has no reversal COULD be a mistake. Then again some designs are just pure shite, just look at the DeLorian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar. 
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
    • I think attaching a nut to the lid to pull it off is the least destructive, any damage damage on the outside is going to an easier fix than any created when trying to push it out from the inside. Scratching up the inside of the lid , mainspring or arbor bearing will be risk. Just my opinion.
    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
×
×
  • Create New...