Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, AndyHull said:

I may have to source another watch for the parts for this watch, that I sourced for parts for another watch..... There is nothing mad about that whatsoever .... is there?

I may be guilty of this very thing! :D

Posted
13 hours ago, AndyHull said:

RIMG0521.thumb.JPG.dab9a5dc0b4a59bf2ca7f14968a87e3d.JPG

A Vestron "Foreign" (so probably German) pin lever pocket watch.

I actually picked this up to scavenge the hands from, but I couldn't resist having a look inside to see what ailed it.

The balance was rattling around, but on closer examination it appeared to be complete, so I removed and re-fitted the balance cock and balance, gave the whole thing a quick and rudimentary clean and oiled the pivots. Off it went.

It clearly still has a couple of issues. No crown, no stem and no second hand being the obvious ones. However, straight off the bat, and without any adjustment it is sitting around +80 sec per day, with the adjuster slap bang in the middle, so I'll let it run down and see how it fares. Hopefully as the oil gets to work, it will slow down slightly.

I may have to source another watch for the parts for this watch, that I sourced for parts for another watch..... There is nothing mad about that whatsoever .... is there?

Perfectly  sane

  • Haha 1
Posted
15 hours ago, yankeedog said:

Perfectly  sane

I'm glad you think so. In that case, if I reveal that I now have not one, not two, but three of these linen texture dialed Poljot 2614.2h Sekondas (the latest having just come back to life on the workbench this afternoon), I'm sure this will further prove my sanity.

I guess I'm just as sane as I need to be, and no more. :D

RIMG0535.thumb.JPG.645d4688a06a28bda51aa72ccb4e8808.JPG

There is something quite irresistible about them. Despite the keyless work's tenancy to go "spriong" if you remove the stem without pulling it out to the hand setting position, they are actually very easy to work on.

RIMG0531.thumb.JPG.78965cfab99f522f698613080efb51db.JPG

This latest one wouldn't wind (the click spring was  gummed up in the clicked position, so any attempt to wind resulted in it instantly unwinding again). It was filthy, both inside and out, and needed a crystal, as the old one was in a shocking mess.

RIMG0525.thumb.JPG.02cbe62737b9209c00297319e87764ac.JPG

Almost the instant I wore it, I managed to scratch the new crystal (that little mark near the 8 o'clock position), by whacking it against the work bench in a futile attempt to catch a dropped screwdriver as I was putting stuff away. Time for a few more minutes polishing I guess to see if I can buff it out.

Posted (edited)

I don't have any of the  "newer " poljots, but I have noted  a weakness in the keyless  works  in the 2409 type. They were often placed in off brand cases during the sixties. While  the are typically  good  runners they often show up  for sale on line  with  missing  crowns and broken  stems. 

Edited by yankeedog
Posted


Hi

I've been wearing a couple of recent incomings!
 

Dan henrt 1963 Pilots Chrono, It has the SR71 Lockheed Blackbird on the case back!

tQmbWTH.jpg

This is number 0348 of a run of 1,963 pieces :thumbsu:

xzPgR56.jpg

 

Also been alternating bewteen this Dan henry 1968 Dragster chrono :)

xG96Gkb.jpg

This one is number 0318 of 1,968 pieces..

S85bad6.jpg

 

John :thumbsu:

  • Like 3
Posted
5 minutes ago, Johnbaz said:


Hi

I've been wearing a couple of recent incomings!
 

Dan henrt 1963 Pilots Chrono, It has the SR71 Lockheed Blackbird on the case back!

tQmbWTH.jpg

This is number 0348 of a run of 1,963 pieces :thumbsu:

xzPgR56.jpg

 

Also been alternating bewteen this Dan henry 1968 Dragster chrono :)

xG96Gkb.jpg

This one is number 0318 of 1,968 pieces..

S85bad6.jpg

 

John :thumbsu:

So these are modern watches 'inspired' by watches of those dates?

  • Like 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, JohnD said:

So these are modern watches 'inspired' by watches of those dates?

Hi John

Yes, Also, The date seems to command how many are made in the production run too!

 

John :)

Posted

Since I've already featured the wristwatch I'm wearing today, I'll highlight today's pocket watch. It's a 1913 South Bend 16s. It has gold inlaid engravings on the movement and the jewels are in gold settings. The dial is double sunk and it's in a chrome plated, salesman's case with an exhibition back. I haven't had to touch this watch since I bought it other than to polish the crystals. One of my favorites. 

20200304_064949.thumb.jpg.9b8b8791cba0712cdd77cff50744a90f.jpg

20200304_064923.thumb.jpg.803450fe86be5fbfc7baa8b00a6b2f43.jpg

20200304_065007.thumb.jpg.3728ad5f6a7c9fbaf3093fd84f152fbe.jpg

  • Like 6
Posted

I received this Vostok 24hr manual wind through the post yesterday, I quite like it even though it's strange to read the hour off! :huh:

CkmpVV8.jpg

S6K3myB.jpg

FCXsWyP.jpg

 

It's new old stock, 44mm, Screw down crown and was only £25 posted!!

 

John 

  • Like 4
Posted

A Luch SU 2365 based quartz. Date unknown, but from the style of the movement I would guess late 1970s. although it is alleged that this movement had quite a long production run.

RIMG0572.thumb.JPG.283e7130cb51971b16a7dfd2c2e217ae.JPG

You can see the original USSR era cell was still in the watch when I opened it, along with many years of accumulated nastiness.

RIMG0573.thumb.JPG.ec78b68a999e9bc0a137e7f0b23e64bf.JPG

RIMG0576.thumb.JPG.86145df6223945fe113ea3fdaae9caa1.JPG

Here it is looking a whole lot more wholesome following a deep clean and a replacement cell.  Some of you may recognize this dial design, as being one of the ones I looked, and created my own portrayal of, in the Decal Dial tutorial thread.

I've swapped it for my other recent favorite CCCP escape, the 19 Jewel Sekonda TV face, which has spent quite a lot of time on my wrist recently.

  • Like 1
Posted

Today's watch is my recently restored 1958 Timex 100. I swapped the movement, cleaned up the exterior  and polished the crystal. Judging by the shadow the hands left on the dial, there is a chance the lume is, or was radioactive.

20200305_091729.thumb.jpg.d63e1e25b24aa6c557f8024330fd572a.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
19 minutes ago, FLwatchguy73 said:

Judging by the shadow the hands left on the dial, there is a chance the lume is, or was radioactive.

 

Possibly mildly radioactive, but I'm not sure that the brown marks are actually burn in from radiation, although they could well be, I simply don't know what the mechanism would be.

Radium is a possibilty, in which, with a half life of around 1600 years, they are likely to be pretty much as radioactive as the day they were painted (which in the grand scheme of things, is not particularly radioactive). The "phosphor" (actually zinc based emitter is a better description), is the bit that degrades, not the radiation source.

Posted
22 hours ago, FLwatchguy73 said:

Today's watch is my recently restored 1958 Timex 100. I swapped the movement, cleaned up the exterior  and polished the crystal. Judging by the shadow the hands left on the dial, there is a chance the lume is, or was radioactive.

20200305_091729.thumb.jpg.d63e1e25b24aa6c557f8024330fd572a.jpg

Timex? Radioactive? Probably  rust.

  • Like 2
Posted

IMG_20200307_210636.thumb.jpg.670caba4fa6e43d074a2230eb61233ba.jpg

Today's 'Beast From The East' is a quite well worn (Read Scratched) Casio Edifice EQB-510D its about three/four years old & to date has given no issues whatsoever, a tad chunky I suppose, but you certainly know that your timekeeping needs are being catered for at almost 200grams & 45mm on the case diameter.... Its a good 15mm thick, however as you can see its complication rich, so I guess they needed a lot of space to shoehorn the 4529 movent in..... 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

Today's wrist watch has again already been featured, so today I'll showcase my huge Roskopf Messagero pocket watch. I dunno what size it is, 20s maybe.. Bigger even. I love the dial and the bold Roman numerals. It ticks so loud people have randomly asked what was ticking. I don't know an awful lot about it, other than it's Swiss, pin set, pin pallet, possibly 7 jewels, did I mention it was huge? 66mm to be exact. 

20200307_213642.thumb.jpg.ef0a02f673e0e1f3aa3aaf220559224c.jpg

The barrel bridge reminiscent ofthe batman symbol. 

20200307_213710.thumb.jpg.8eb9dd774e55a56538e2c4f6586b4274.jpg

The little one is an 18s Waltham, it measures 55mm and looks tiny

20200307_213750.thumb.jpg.a6eec0a81c6f6ab692f708f3da52195d.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Two fine looking watches you have there. I'm not quite sure that "fine" would be the best description of the one I have just been working on however.

By a bizarre coincidence I have also been looking at an oversized pocket watch, but not one with quite the same gravitas as that one.

A Dax (Westclox) made some time between 1973 and 1979. -> https://clockhistory.com/0/westclox/series/series-20-1/style-147-1.html

This one also keeps the neighbours awake at night with its ticking. :D

RIMG0598.thumb.JPG.96701cbb87571405683a786b87c0bade.JPG

Here is a comparison with a Timex from around the same period. The Timex is positively dainty compared with the 50mm case of the Dax.

RIMG0593.thumb.JPG.67960debff17c0b971b4e24822744aa5.JPG

As you can see it shares more of its pedigree with alarm clocks than fine Swiss timepieces.

It came with all of those apprentice marks, so obviously someone else has already had a crack at getting it going (without success I might add).

It is now running reasonably well (as compared to an alarm click, rather than an Omega Chronometer obviously).

The beat error fluctuates more than I would like,  due to the poor tolerances but following a clean and service it is sitting +/- 10 sec per day or so, so long as you don't pay any attention to the wild variations that will no soubt occur when you actually carry the thing around.

Restored.thumb.jpg.4891606451377cb27efc11a207d3083e.jpg

It polished up nicely and a little T-Cut restored the factory shine.
It has a certain charm, but I certainly wouldn't rely on it to catch a flight.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 1
Posted

The bright red casing and 70's aesthetic reminds me of a quirky German made sport timer/ wrist watch that was made for the 1972 Olympics. It came with either a snap on stopwatch casing molded in bright red plastic, or it could be put into a wristwatch casing, also in plastic. I have this on my radar to add to my collection someday.

657d4bbaefbdb8b2be7d37d8755ee57a.jpg.37f95a9c03d7be52adf327bb1d2eb59c.jpg

6353feb3-9845-441e-b661-29f7630042d8.jpg.5f37f3a9737ed55152b9ffbaec401f1b.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
14 hours ago, AndyHull said:

That is an interesting piece, what is inside the case? Being a Kienzle, it could be just as quirky inside as it is out.

here ya go

 

s-l1600 (29).jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Nice. The exhibition case back is a nice touch, and that is a very Kienzle looking take on a chrono/stopwatch mechanism.

Now I wonder what the chances of one of those showing up "spares or repair" for under £4.04 are. I suspect I'll need to  open my wallet a whole lot wider if I spot one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...