Jump to content

From Russia with love...and sand!


Recommended Posts

And I had to stop at this point. I should be installing the start/stop actuator and reset lever, but the first one is damaged, so I need to source it.

Furthermore, I still need to get the balance wheel for the other Poljot, the Sturmanskie, swap it with the one belonging to this movement, and a stem and crown assembly, which was missing. So a lot to do and some parts to buy.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The operating lever (part 8140) for the Poljot 3133 movement is very hard to find. So I decided to look for an alternative. Being the 3133 from the Russian manufacturer in fact a "clone" of the Valjoux 7734, with some changes, I would expect some if not almost all parts be interchangeable.

A nice thread over at watchuseek explains the similarities and differences between these two movements:

http://forums.watchuseek.com/f54/poljot-3133-vs-valjoux-7734-lysanderxii-224306.html

So I set my searches on eBay for an operating lever for a Valjoux 7734. I am quite shocked at the prices I found, honestly... they start at 30€  to end up to 103€!!1 That is CRAZY!!!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I was waiting for the balance wheel to be marked as "shipped", which was earlier today, I sourced out a stem+crown and the operating lever, part 8140. I also bought the lever spring, part 8335, which was not cheap by any means... I hope all arrives for the end of this week....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/13/2017 at 9:47 AM, GeorgeClarkson said:

So I set my searches on eBay for an operating lever for a Valjoux 7734. I am quite shocked at the prices I found, honestly... they start at 30€  to end up to 103€!!1 That is CRAZY!!!

Yes, I've discovered if the part is called "Valjoux" it's going to cost a pretty penny! :huh:

Alternately, I needed a minute recording jumper for a Venus 170 and was able to find one from a Strela 3017 (formerly Venus 150) that looks like it will work with minor modification... for about a quarter of the cost.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is getting addictive... The same person who sold me the stem+crown had an almost complete movement + case he was disassembling to sell it as parts... Story is that he had this complete watch that stopped working for who knows whatever reason (the chronograph was no working) so he sent it to a watchmaker to asses the problem and solve it.

Well, after two (2!!!) years he got it back, in pieces, inside a tin box... So I asked him how much he wanted for the whole thing, and we bargained a price we were both comfortable with, considering the status of the poor watch. So I will be receiving another 3133 to service, or use for parts this time.

I know you want pics, I can only give you the seller's, who I hope will forgive me for posting them here....

The first pic is, of course, the crown + stem...

s-l500.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of the parts arrived today, and I was eager to continue with the reassembly of this movement/watch... but I encountered some issues.... mainly incompatibility issues, that is.

But first, some pics...

This is what I received today: The balance wheel, the operating and fly-back lever spring, part no.8335 and the operating lever, part no.8140

Both the spring and the operating lever, since it was almost impossible to find them original Poljot, had to be sourced from its counterpart movement, Valjoux 7734. Since the Poljot 3133 is basically a "clone" of the 7733 from the swiss manufacturer, being built with the same machinery and tools, I was hoping they were fully copatible one with each other. But I was wrong...

IMG_20170120_133009675.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or at least partially wrong: the spring (part no.8335) is perfectly compatible, and works like a charm. I did compare it with an original Poljot spring, and although it is slightly longer on one end, it fits perfectly in the crevice of the movement, and it is the same width.

A pic of the bag containing the two Valjoux/poljot parts:

IMG_20170120_133040116.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The issue is basically that the operating lever from Valjoux is slightly longer that the Poljot one. This means that it fits inside the same space as the original, but it is very hard to actuate. Furthermore, I also noticed that the end on the side of the hole for the post on the movement plate, where the screw should go, is also slightly thicker, so when you screw it down it locks the lever. While this is easily resolvable, with a bit of sanding, the fact that the lever is longer than necessary makes it all more difficult than it needed to be.

Now I have 2 options:

  1. I file down the end with the hole and then I also file the movement chronograph plate creating a slightly larger "C" gap
  2. I wait for the other movement I got, a Poljot 3133 as well, that should have a perfectly working 8140 operating lever. In this case, I bought this Valjoux part for nothing.

Of course I will wait for the other Poljot movement to arrive and try out that lever, but in the meantime I also wanted to see this movement working... I am a bit impatient, honestly.

BTW, I also installed the balance to see if the movement works, and it does.

IMG_20170120_134530845.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And today I received the third movement, which is almost complete except for the balance wheel and balance cock(or balance bridge if you will).

Here's a pic of what I received: the almost complete movement on the right, a not so bad case and its back cover below, and some goodies inside the plastic box...

IMG_20170121_172332391.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The plastic box contains another white dial with English writings, hands, the pallet fork and its screws, the stem and crown and the glass for the case, that I fear though belongs to another type of case since its border is too high. Pictured below the two white dials: on the left the dial that came with the Admiral on the right the new one. They are almost identical, where it not for the English writing and different font for the Roman numerals.

IMG_20170121_172505793.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And.... the third movement has been cleaned... and will be, without the parts that I need to use for the Admiral Watch, put back together. At the moment I am checking all the parts, one by one, to asses their status. I already saw that a couple of parts do show some rust, unfortunately.

As per the Admiral: the operating lever of this third movement is in perfect condition, and I already put it in place, and the movement is finally complete. The watch  itself has also received the stem and crown of the third spare watch, yet the crown is chromed so I will have to check out if I find a proper, gold plated crown IF I want to keep the case and dial of the Admiral

This leads me to another dilemma (the first one being sorted): what should I do with this case? the pushers are a bit pitted in their gold plating, the crown, as I said, is missing, the glass is completely scratched, but still allows the dial to be easily read. The problem is actually the dial, without the 11 hour marker, and the broken chronograph second hand.

It will be extremely hard to find a good looking watch with broken movement to get the complete case from. It would be much easier to just buy a NOS case, chromed, off eBay, for some 60€. Then fit the white dial and source proper hands, which are easier to find.

I haven't also tested the movement of the Admiral for accuracy. But I noticed it runs a bit fast. This is though due to the unregulated balance wheel, probably.

So what are your thoughts?

poljot_3133_admiral_rebuild_1.jpg

poljot_3133_admiral_rebuilt_2_.jpg

Edited by GeorgeClarkson
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm - 

White dial, new hands, replace the crown with a suitable generic, new glass,  and clean the case and pushers as best you can. See how it looks, might be OK! If not, you can then spend the money on a NOS case, and you'll only be out a glass and crown, which aren't a lot of money and may be useful elsewhere.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very impressive work George; hats off :bow: It also cleaned up very nicely! Surely, by judging the pictures, you must have a bucket full of this Baltic sea sand ....... I've heard it's a collectors item :) 

I get a good idea what's in store for me :huh:

BTW; I bought the early 1992 Poljot 3133 "Sport", marked on the dial with "Made in the USSR". After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, only briefly after my model, the dials were marked with "Made in Russia" ......... I just couldn't resist ........ sorry ...... ;)

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro. I thought the idea was for the epilame to create a barrier, a wall between the lubrication and anything else, so the lube cant spread.
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
    • I think attaching a nut to the lid to pull it off is the least destructive, any damage damage on the outside is going to an easier fix than any created when trying to push it out from the inside. Scratching up the inside of the lid , mainspring or arbor bearing will be risk. Just my opinion.
    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
×
×
  • Create New...