Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A few months back, I purchased online this Breitling Navitimer for a fair price despite the fact that the watch was non-functioning at the time.  I did this without seeing the movement which was a bit of a risk as there was the possibility the insides were rusted out, but the price was right and the I figured I could resell the case and dial if the rest turned out to be a disaster.

IMG_1231.JPG

Things looked bad when I received the watch as it wouldn't run at all and the pushers were jammed.  I noted on inspection that the dial didn't sit flush either which caused me quite a bit of concern.  Removing the caseback revealed one of the case screws had broken off and gummed up the works.  

IMG_1232.JPG

Extracting the screw head brought the watch back to life and allowed the chronograph to function properly as well.  

IMG_1303.JPG

Knowing I would need to extract the remains of the broken screw from the plate in order to properly secure the movement and seeing that the watch clearly had not been serviced in a while, I added it to my queue.  It would be a few months before I would have time to work on it, but I must admit to being anxious.  ^_^

I don't often work with watches of this vintage that aren't terribly weathered but the dial and hands here were in quite good condition.  Removing these gave my heart palpitations but with a bit of patience and caution I was able to get to the engine without damaging any of the paint.  The video Mark posted earlier of a Navitimer service was a quite a help also as I was a bit stumped when it came to removing the bezel.

IMG_1410.JPG

The watch movement is a Venus 178 which is a fine manual wind chronograph movement that was produced in the 1950's and 1960's.  Contemporary chronographs movements would be the Valjoux 72 and Lemania CH27.

IMG_1419.JPG

Disassembly was pretty straight forward.  The chronograph mechanism is bolted piecemeal to the barrel plate so each lever needed to be removed separately.  I would remove each spring first to release tension then proceed with the removal of the accompanying lever.  Each screw was then returned to its hole so that I wouldn't mix them up later.  Pictures were taken throughout the process for reference.

IMG_1424.JPG

IMG_1429.JPG

IMG_1431.JPG

The dial side received the same treatment for the hour recorder and keyless works.

IMG_1432.JPG

IMG_1435.JPG

I had assumed I would need to dissolve the broken screw in a bath of alum in order to remove it from the plate but found this not to be the case.  Once the barrel plate was removed, enough threads poked above the main plate to allow me to grab it with my tweezers and slowly unscrew the remainder.

IMG_1442.JPG

I have an old L & R machine for cleaning movements, so the parts were separated and packed in small baskets before undergoing a cleaning in the appropriate solvent and rinse.IMG_1445.JPG

The case, caseback, and pushers were cleaned separately in small ultrasonic cleaner.  Since the shafts of the pushers are not the same length I snapped a pic before disassembly for later reference.

IMG_1447.JPG

Following cleaning, each piece was inspected under the loupe before reassembly.  I can't stress the importance of this step!

IMG_1448.JPG

Reassembly was the reverse of disassembly.  I referred heavily to the images taken during the disassembly process and also used the published technical sheets and representative Esemble-O-Graf. Before reassembling the chronograph the base movement was completed and properly adjusted.

IMG_1453.JPG

Despite having already procured a replacement, I reused the original mainspring as it seemed to have quite a bit of life still in it.  My assessment turned out to be correct when I placed the base movement on the timegrapher and discovered the amplitude was fairly high.  This is not a problem I've had before but since the watch had a full wind I felt there wasn't much need to replace the spring with a weaker one.  The beat error was initially on the high side (3.1ms) but a bit of adjustment brought that down.  I suppose I would be remiss if I didn't point out that adjusting the beat error was difficult as there is no beat corrector and the Breguet hairspring sits so low that it's difficult to see the position of the roller jewel.

IMG_1458.JPG

Assembly of the chronograph mechanism is laborious as each piece needs to be checked for movement and properly lubricated before moving on to the next.  

IMG_1489.JPG

I had inadvertently mixed up a few screws on the dial said which added another hour of labor to the job as well.  The toughest bit was the actuating lever for the hour recorder- it passes from one side of the plate to the other and likes to fall out when you try to thread the screw to secure it.  Otherwise reassembly went as I hoped- no parts lost or left over!

IMG_1491.JPG

I cleaned the dial and slide rule with a bit of Rodico.  The slide rule is set in the bezel before the crystal is dropped in.  A new crystal was needed as well since the original was damaged beyond repair.

IMG_1455.JPGIMG_1492.JPG

Lastly, a replacement case screw was procured to reset the movement and a crystal press was used to reset the crystal and caseback.  I added a black leather band as the expanding bracelet wasn't really my taste.

IMG_1504.JPG

For my next chronograph project I'm hoping for a Valjoux 72 movement or perhaps an Excelsior Park EP40.  We'll see what comes along though.  ^_^

  • Like 10
Posted

lovely Job and lovely watch I've yet to try a chrono Service / repair I keep seeing them on the bay and always think like you did is it worth effort if parts are broken. In your case you found a good one well done and a good job.

  • Like 1
Posted

I really enjoyed reading this and very clear photos as well. A bit of a gamble for you put it payed off.

Well done you now have a very fine watch. :Bravo:

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Beautiful watch and your work was nicely described and documented.  One question:  You said you inspected each piece after cleaning and this was important. What kind if things did you find? 

Posted (edited)
On November 27, 2016 at 11:46 PM, ScottMcAfee said:

Beautiful watch and your work was nicely described and documented.  One question:  You said you inspected each piece after cleaning and this was important. What kind if things did you find? 

You never know what you will find but it could end up saving you a lot of time in the end if you catch any problems before assembling the movement.  A while back I repaired an Omega Speedmaster and didn't notice that two gears on the barrel were damaged; this resulted in the watch stopping after about forty five minutes of running error free.  Now I know to inspect the gear teeth on every wheel and pinion before assembly.  ^_^

In addition to checking the gear teeth I'll also make sure every bit of dirt and grease was cleaned off each piece, double check the jewels for dirt or cracks, and make sure all the parts that were run through the cleaner made it back to the desk.

Edited by RyMoeller
grammar
  • Like 1
  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
    • Thanks for the replies! Here's a photo of the front of the clock and a GIF animation of the movement (exposed by removing the black cap in the centre of the clock). You can see the behaviour of the gears. It's a fairly valuable clock from the 80s (Braun ABW 35). I'm not sure if replacing the movement would diminish the value, so I'd prefer to keep the original parts if it's easy to fix. But since the movement itself is pretty generic, I guess, maybe replacing it wouldn't make any difference with regard to the value of the clock? Or would it? I suppose the value is mostly in the design.
×
×
  • Create New...