Jump to content

Timex disassembly help


Recommended Posts

On a local watchmaker forum one is asking help to disassemble this Timex with m10x movement. 

14563431_548991075290890_6075429312692328567_n.jpg

The autowinder is already removed. The stem can be pulled out after undo that screw next to it. The glass is not in a removable bezel. Please help, how can we remove the movement?

The watch is going a few ticks and then stops. The balance is wobbling so there is a screw on the dial side to decrease endshake. We want to get to that screw.

Thank You!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're not designed to be serviced. I think the accepted method of 'servicing' is to remove the dial and hands and dunk the movement in cleaning fluid followed by oiling the pivots.

Looks like Timex was ahead of its time, the new swatch auto is similar but I don't think it'll outlast a Timex!

Anil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having only yesterday serviced a 1975 Cal.32 Timex auto in accordance with Timex's published procedures, including adjusting the rotor bearings by tightening the rivet on my staking set, I can happily report an increase in amplitude of about 100 degrees to just under 200 degrees (it was desperately in need of a clean), and a rate of +/-20sec per day. Not the performance I would expect to see from a fully jewelled Swiss watch, but not too bad at all for a 40 year old pin pallet, 0 jewel budget watch that is still on its original main spring.

Not only were Timex pin pallet movements most definitely meant to be serviced, but the process is both quick and easy, and the results worth while.

:thumbsu:

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bobm12 said:

Walkthrough, Marc? :D

Sadly Bob on this one the camera was not on the bench.

To be fair though the process is so simple that there isn't really anything to see. That being said, the next Timex I do I will present for your delectation.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Marc. Much appreciated! I'll be curious to see the next one. Never done a Timex myself!

Pity you didn't have the camera this time, though! Interesting how those rivets are worked out!

Cheers,

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
On 10/6/2016 at 3:22 PM, oldhippy said:

Years ago I would disassemble Timex watches with a hammer because there **BLEEP** rubbish.

 

On 10/6/2016 at 3:58 PM, Cad101 said:

I have yet to find a timex watch you can actually service all those riveted plates make it impossible.

One has to try

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/6/2016 at 6:32 PM, szbalogh said:

I have found a topic here showing the stripped down movement :) But lacking in the disassembly of the watch. 

Meanwhile the guy could adjust the balance with that screw and now it keeps moving but with terrible low amplitude. 

That's what I am going to do clean the movement 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/9/2016 at 1:15 PM, anilv said:

They're not designed to be serviced. I think the accepted method of 'servicing' is to remove the dial and hands and dunk the movement in cleaning fluid followed by oiling the pivots.

Looks like Timex was ahead of its time, the new swatch auto is similar but I don't think it'll outlast a Timex!

Anil

I am going to try and do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/9/2016 at 2:09 PM, Marc said:

Having only yesterday serviced a 1975 Cal.32 Timex auto in accordance with Timex's published procedures, including adjusting the rotor bearings by tightening the rivet on my staking set, I can happily report an increase in amplitude of about 100 degrees to just under 200 degrees (it was desperately in need of a clean), and a rate of +/-20sec per day. Not the performance I would expect to see from a fully jewelled Swiss watch, but not too bad at all for a 40 year old pin pallet, 0 jewel budget watch that is still on its original main spring.

Not only were Timex pin pallet movements most definitely meant to be serviced, but the process is both quick and easy, and the results worth while.

:thumbsu:

I agree.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎10‎/‎6‎/‎2016 at 5:10 AM, szbalogh said:

On a local watchmaker forum one is asking help to disassemble this Timex with m10x movement. 

14563431_548991075290890_6075429312692328567_n.jpg

The autowinder is already removed. The stem can be pulled out after undo that screw next to it. The glass is not in a removable bezel. Please help, how can we remove the movement?

The watch is going a few ticks and then stops. The balance is wobbling so there is a screw on the dial side to decrease endshake. We want to get to that screw.

Thank You!

   the inverted cone shape adjusting screw? I  think  the staff is supost to "float a bit".    vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/29/2019 at 4:22 PM, cadet said:

Hi, can you tell me how to get the movement out of a Timex which is vintage and assembled in Taiwan.

Just wanted to bring your attention to the feature that allows to group answers (in this case to a 3 years old topic) to multiple postings by clicking the plus sign on the bottom left corner of each, and then "Quote" in the pop-up that appears the bottom right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

    i am wearing a timex - as we speak !   that is a " space age timex"  -- never seen one of those.    that floating balance might require a different viscosity of lube oil ?    vin  p.s. --" the model 29 is a mod. 22 with a winder hung on it".   via timex collectors site.

IMG_1053.JPG

Edited by vinn3
new info from web
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
    • Maybe I'm over simplifying this and I'm a little late to the discussion, but just by my looking at oil when I use it on a treated cap jewel  the oil stays in one nice bubble, but when I don't it spreads out to the edges of the jewel. I'm not sure (but could well be wrong) but the analogy of a waxed car and rain is accurate in this case, the wax is very hydrophobic and repels the water, however, the process epilame works by is a different physical process based upon cohesion/adhesion (oleophilic) not repulsion (oleophobic)  at least as far as I have read/observed. If one were to use a oleophobic substance equivalent to wax (hydrophobic) then one would need to create a donut shape to fence in the oil, however if one used such a strategy with a epilame which is oleophilic then the oil would sit on the ring of the donut and not in the 'donut hole', exactly where you don't want it. Even if the oil is smeared then the oleophilic epilame should pull it back to the center (see diagram below). Reference For interest the chemical in epilame is 2-(PERFLUOROHEXYL) ETHYL METHACRYLATE, CAS NO: 2144-53-8
×
×
  • Create New...