Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Been investigating watch sizes. A friend asked about a watch that is 24.5 width and 31.5 lug to lug. From the 1930's. I advised during that time period men's watches were smaller than today. My opinion is its a men's watch - case reads Wadsworth 10/0. I think  a Gruen withh sub seconds hand (which I have rarely seen on smaller women's watches).

Thoughts or opinions?

 

Thanks,

Gary

Posted

IMG_0296[1].JPGMy navigator is about that size and isn't classed as a women's watch but in todays market it probably would be.Also I think from the late 30's through the 40's any kind of metal was in high demand at that point during the war effort and so reflected on watch making also less metal smaller watch.

  • Like 2
Posted
6 hours ago, Gary said:

Been investigating watch sizes. A friend asked about a watch that is 24.5 width and 31.5 lug to lug. From the 1930's. I advised during that time period men's watches were smaller than today. My opinion is its a men's watch - case reads Wadsworth 10/0. I think  a Gruen withh sub seconds hand (which I have rarely seen on smaller women's watches).

Thoughts or opinions?

 

Thanks,

Gary

Hello,

You're right about sub-secounds on a vintage ladies timepiece--I've never seen that. The size at 24.5mm is small even by vintage standards, so it could be a boys watch. My opinion is that a man's watch probably doesn't look right smaller than 32mm, and since I don't like that "clown-size" trend on many modern watches, nothing larger than 40-42mm. 

JC

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, noirrac1j said:

My opinion is that a man's watch probably doesn't look right smaller than 32mm, and since I don't like that "clown-size" trend on many modern watches, nothing larger than 40-42mm. 

I saw a 60mm Invicta, had about a pound of 316L stainless, probably would scrap for a few $$, :biggrin: 

(clown size) good one!

Posted

I have small wrist so anything bigger than 30-40mm looks awkward, I like the older, smaller rectangular case designs from the 40's and 50's, they just look better on my wrist. I have a few Bulova 23j autos that are about 32mm, but that's about the smallest I can wear. I suppose it boils down to comfort.

Posted
1 hour ago, WileyDave said:

I have small wrist so anything bigger than 30-40mm looks awkward, I like the older, smaller rectangular case designs from the 40's and 50's, they just look better on my wrist. I have a few Bulova 23j autos that are about 32mm, but that's about the smallest I can wear. I suppose it boils down to comfort.

I too like the smaller rectangular (some are just 22-22) and cushion cases. My old GMT II took some time getting used to it it felt like a big weight. I don't have large wrist. I do think the 24.5 x 31.5 is a man's. My favorite military style Marvin is just at 30. I think.

Thanks guys! Actually this thread could be interesting. But I guess it boils down to comfort and the timepiece.

 

Posted
3 hours ago, WileyDave said:

I saw a 60mm Invicta, had about a pound of 316L stainless, probably would scrap for a few $$, :biggrin: 

(clown size) good one!

Invicta watches are ridiculous....not that they aren't interesting designs or anything, but they are truly behemoths! It's like wearing a small wallclock on your wrist.

Posted

You are right gents watches were a lot smaller then today's monsters. The things that people have on there wrists are ugly and wouldn't look out of place around their necks. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Yeah, big watches are not that appealing from my point of view either and Invicta takes the cake!

Although, to be fair, (not to take their side though) they also have a line of "traditional" sizes, that and their "partnership" with Seiko, you could get a good value...or a tinkering alternative.

Most of their "mid" sizes (40mm) use the NH35 movement...others bigger and smaller if they say quartz it is usually some cheapo Seiko PC21 or v657 type. Their "Swiss" line is usually ISA (or maybe Ronda?)...I don't remember seeing any ETA in them...at least lately.

Posted

 I know have the watch and I am not sure...looks like a man's but it is smaller than I thought. Thoughts?

Since they are closeups it may be harder to get  reference. 

 

Glycine01.png

Glycine02.png

Posted
Just now, noirrac1j said:

Looks like a man's watch. The sub second hand isn't seen in ladies watches of this period.

JC

Hey JC,

I agree. Although it is small. Just seeing what everyone things.

Posted

Yep looks manly to me its not pretty enough for a women's either from that time period 1930's a women's watch usually had a single bracelet type band. I have seen some women's watches with sub second dials though from the 30's

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi JC!

you don't sleep either! Lol

I will wear it! I wear my great great grandmother's little Elgin and little thin band that I inherited! Most of the time it ends up being a conversation piece and it keeps great time. But if the lighting is low I can't wait read the time? LOL

Posted
1 minute ago, Gary said:

Hi JC!

you don't sleep either! Lol

I will wear it! I wear my great great grandmother's little Elgin and little thin band that I inherited! Most of the time it ends up being a conversation piece and it keeps great time. But if the lighting is low I can't wait read the time? LOL

Hey Gary! No, I don't sleep. I am processing some brain images for a publication submission, but I leave my computer on when I want to take a break and let my own brain idle a bit!

Its a beautiful vintage watch and you could wear it on a single-piece wide band strap--like a vintage one piece or bund-style. That would give it a little more presence on the wrist. 

JC

  • 1 month later...
Posted
On ‎6‎/‎15‎/‎2016 at 0:41 AM, noirrac1j said:

I leave my computer on when I want to take a break and let my own brain idle a bit!

Hi Joe, just the way I do...or similar if you will: I leave my mind on when I want to take a break and the computer idling! A blank mind is very boring!!! :D

Cheers,

Bob

Posted
4 hours ago, bobm12 said:

Hi Joe, just the way I do...or similar if you will: I leave my mind on when I want to take a break and the computer idling! A blank mind is very boring!!! :D

Cheers,

Bob

I can totally relate! A blank mind is a dangerous thing! 

J

Posted

I noticed when in LA visiting my son that the watch size that was being worn tended towards the enormous.  It is of course just personal preference but it seems like a trend.  Some seemed so large as to be bordering on the ridiculous though.  It was not possible to identify most in passing and I suspect there were a lot of Quartz watches and the other thing I noticed was they mostly seemed to be black.  I don't really have any strong opinion about what a person wants to wear.  I remember my son saying my Omega Bumper looked like a ladies watch as it was so small but I personally prefer it to the extra large stuff.

i do have a treasured Quartz Tissot that my mother gave me and which was one of the reasons I ended up in this forum when I had to replace the movement. My largest regularly worn watch is a Glycine Airman SST "Pumpkin"

image.jpegOmega Bumper 2.jpg

Cheers,

Vic

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
    • After cleaning up the pivots, I made bushes on the lathe. At this point I've pressed in 6 bushes (3 sets) and the wheels turn smooth. What I can also tell you, is that I'm not looking forward to final assembly. Getting the pivots aligned seems to get exponentially more difficult with each wheel that is added.
    • Islands are interesting places to live depending upon their size and other factors. This is a bigger island and it has a bridge to get there at least on one end. It's also big enough that you don't have to go someplace else to get things typically. It can be a problem if you get a job in Seattle though. Yes I've known of people who commuted from the island to Seattle for a job and I don't quite remember how many hours it took but it took a long time. So basically islands are nice if you don't have to leave very often.
    • Thanks @JohnR725! Everything you say makes a lot of sense and is encouraging to read.
    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
×
×
  • Create New...