Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm getting a bit disappointed with the conditions in brand new, not cheap Seikos are leaving the factory.

6R15 watch made in '14, has been used very few times.

Pic taken 95% power reserve, crown down.

I'm unsure what to do about or if just leave it alone. Messing with the balance / hs on these has proven a bet with large chances of doing worse.

24226537883_700d6029fd.jpg

Posted

This looks bad. Assume the watch is clean and there is no issue with the hair spring? You will need to set the beat error first, which is an art. This noise does look like there is a bad component in the movement?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I would say it is not beat error 0.1ms is well within tolerance also the amplitude is not good but I suspect something else is amiss. As a first step I would check it is not magnetised. If Ok then clean the escape components & check the pallets,check for end shake of the balance etc.

  • Like 1
Posted

I agree with CB, demagnetising is always a good idea. Before taking things apart or making adjustments, I would also be curious to see what change, if any, you get by oiling the pallets.

  • Like 1
Posted

Ok, I looked again at the data and I sadly agree with clock boy, your beat error is good, but your pattern looks like there are mechanical issues beyond a simple regulation.

From Canada

Posted

As a reminder a timing machine cannot give correct numeric results if the pattern looks bad like this. Visually does it really look like a .1 ms Beat error? If you can't see the lines both of them what makes you think the timing machine can? Then the timing machine is averaging over time and right now it's averaging garbage. Then the line is slanting downwards wouldn't that indicates it is running slow Except numerically it says it's zero?

 

If we only look at part of it it might be considered some sort of weird escapement problem except you have dots much farther out than just escapement so demagnetising would be good. Then look if you see of the hairspring is bumping into anything. This is where audio real audio versus the synthetic ticking of the timing machine would be nice because if the hairspring is bumping in the something it makes a really interesting clanging musical sound.

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi JDM,

Notice that you've the lift angle set at 52 degrees. I'm not an expert but discussions on other forum suggest that this should be set to 53 degrees for this caliber.

Might be worth checking the technical reference from Seiko if available.

Regards

Nad

Posted

That erratic pattern is very indicative of poor lubrication. Clean, lubricate, demagnetise - retest. :)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted

too many potential problems for a virtually new and lightly used watch. it's not what should be coming out of seiko's factory.

  • Like 1
Posted

too many potential problems for a virtually new and lightly used watch. it's not what should be coming out of seiko's factory.

Many of these watches can be sitting in a shop display window for a very long time, sometimes several years, before being purchased. It's not unusual to have a "new" mechanical watch with a poor reading under these circumstances.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Notice that you've the lift angle set at 52 degrees. I'm not an expert but discussions on other forum suggest that this should be set to 53 degrees for this caliber.

Might be worth checking the technical reference from Seiko if available.

Having set an incorrect lift angle does not cause the erratic pattern. In fact it doesn't even change the amplitude reading significantly.

Posted

Many of these watches can be sitting in a shop display window for a very long time, sometimes several years, before being purchased. It's not unusual to have a "new" mechanical watch with a poor reading under these circumstances.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

For Seiko we know year and month of manufacturing from the first two digits of the serial number. In this case July 2014.
Posted

Before taking things apart or making adjustments, I would also be curious to see what change, if any, you get by oiling the pallets.

Someone is interested in purchasing the watch, so I had to do something.

kept movement in case

removed upper jewel assembly, balance, winding weight, auto bridge and 2nd reduction wheel.

let power down

removed pallet bridge and pallet fork

oiled pallet jewel faces and balance staff lower pivot

reistalled parts

oiled upper jewel end stone.

winded fully, let rune few minutes, on timegrapher for regulation.

post-1542-0-47846600-1455208972_thumb.jp

  • Like 1
Posted

Well pleased for you, I had a feeling oil l was going to sort this one out. :) I've had similar issues like that in the past.

Posted

too many potential problems for a virtually new and lightly used watch. it's not what should be coming out of seiko's factory.

 

I just bought a Hamilton Jazzmaster GMT and the GMT hand is not working properly. It is on a 24 hour dial but instead of moving 1/2 the distance on the 12 hour dial thus measuring 1 hour on the 24 hour dial it goes 4 times the distance; thus measuring 4 hours on the 24 hour dial in an hour on the 12 hour dial. This shouldn't be happening in a new watch and this is the 2nd watch I've had in as many weeks! The first Hamilton Jazzmaster GMT just stopped working altogether after a day! 

 

I purchased the Hamilton because I heard many good things about them but I am beginning to wonder.

 

Dave

Posted

Many of these watches can be sitting in a shop display window for a very long time, sometimes several years, before being purchased. It's not unusual to have a "new" mechanical watch with a poor reading under these circumstances.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Shouldn't the seller be responsible for checking this out? After all, the watch should be under warranty. Of course, it is almost impossible to ensure a store will have a watchmaker on staff.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Have meet another one with pretty much the same symptoms, again 6R15 movement from '14, to which I've given the same cure as mentioned above.

I'm still not happy with the amplitude. It must be related to lubrication because I've learned to handle pallet fork and balance assembly with the utmost respect,

When I look at the end stone just removed it had a tiny, perfectly round and centered spot of oil. The one which I'm able to reapply is never so good, and probably excessive. I'm thinking about getting an automatic oiler or at least and high quality Bergeon one.

Also wonder if pallet special oil could help ?!?

 

Before

post-1542-0-05927700-1456230398_thumb.jp

 

After

post-1542-0-58755300-1456230402_thumb.jp

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...