Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:
9 minutes ago, 24h said:

I did not have any decent piezos in my lab (hard to believe...I have everything else!), so I ordered some.

you can get maybe in small toys or musical cards. they also have quartz watches with an hour indicator. They are on the back cover of the watch.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, guidovelasquez said:

or musical cards

Yeah, something got in my head once and I bought a box of 50 Sonalert beepers.  They have three terminals (the extra is a feedback terminal) so you can make oscillators.  I tore one apart and stole the piezo.  It did not work well at all, and I think the problem was that it was pretty thick...perhaps to get a lot of output amplitude...dunno.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Still perfecting the final product...are the smaller ones 'more' sensitive?

Smaller ones seem to produce a "cleaner" and more accurate sound. Any size will work perfectly with TG or Watch-O-Scope but my goal was to get the best sound. As for the question of whether it's more sensitive? I'm not sure! I think the main takeaway from my testing is that if the disk is larger than the diameter of the surface that's making contact with the watch crown, you will pick up additional (unwanted) noise.

The 'pin' on my timing stand is ~6mm so I'd want to have something closer than that rather than overhang it with a 27mm disk.

Here are several recordings that compare 12mm and 27mm from two different watches. The pre-amp, and high-pass filter are the same on all files. I have not yet tried the method that Guido uses with a resistor and transistor. I think it will include even less static/noise.

https://mega.nz/file/dtYHXQqK#0cVkxw02t1NSl4VE3B0tn4pOoGLmTn3NAo5_Xx162N0

Edited by 24h
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, 24h said:

Smaller ones seem to produce a "cleaner" and more accurate sound. Any size will work perfectly with TG or Watch-O-Scope but my goal was to get the best sound. As for the question of whether it's more sensitive? I'm not sure! I think the main takeaway from my testing is that if the disk is larger than the diameter of the surface that's making contact with the watch crown, you will pick up additional (unwanted) noise.

The 'pin' on my timing stand is ~6mm so I'd want to have something closer than that rather than overhang it with a 27mm disk.

Here are several recordings that compare 12mm and 27mm from two different watches. The pre-amp, and high-pass filter are the same on all files. I have not yet tried the method that Guido uses with a resistor and transistor. I think it will include even less static/noise.

https://mega.nz/file/dtYHXQqK#0cVkxw02t1NSl4VE3B0tn4pOoGLmTn3NAo5_Xx162N0

I listened to them...sounds like the 27mm is saturating...at any rate, it is a greater amplitude--what I would expect with the larger vs. smaller.   I am not using the timing software, just looking at the output on my oscilloscope.  Can you show the waveforms for these to cases?  I think watch-o-scope will do that.

Another thing that one would expect.  When I modify the way I mount the piezo, I can change the sensitivity.  Less cantilever...lower amplitude.  This makes sense to me anyway.

Interesting stuff.

I will add an emitter follower and attenuate the output so that I can record it with my Tascam...on another day.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/7/2018 at 4:14 AM, matabog said:

Thank you for sharing this Matablog. Nice files, I did use 4- #10 wood screws to hold the frame and a 1/4" X 20 X 4.5" screw for the watch holder due to not being able to find a long  M6 screw. I still need to add the sensor to it. Here are some pictures of what I made. I also made a thumb screw for this as a M6 (file added Below) but ended up taping it out for the 1/4" X 20. 

Timegrapher Watch holder.jpg

Timegrapher Watch holder (2).jpg

Timegrapher Watch holder (3).jpg

M6 THUMB SCREW.stl

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CWRNH: Nothing I make works the first time. Time to begin troubleshooting. First thing to do is measure voltages at pins 4 and 7 on all ICs to see if they are getting the proper power. If you have a signal generator, attach it to the input and look at the output of the first stage, preferably with an oscilloscope, but a voltmeter will work. U5 getting warm is not a good sign. For me, that often means a ruined IC because of a wiring error.

LittleWatchShop: Why do you want to measure voltage with respect to the negative battery terminal and not ground?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, wlysenko said:

Why do you want to measure voltage with respect to the negative battery terminal and not ground?

I'm sure that LittleWatchShop Will be around a little bit give a better answer than mine. The problem we have is that he's using a virtual ground. That's because there's only one 9 V battery it probably would've been better used two 9 V batteries and have a real ground. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

I'm sure that LittleWatchShop Will be around a little bit give a better answer than mine. The problem we have is that he's using a virtual ground. That's because there's only one 9 V battery it probably would've been better used two 9 V batteries and have a real ground. 

@JohnR725gets to my reasoning...re virtual ground.  I want to measure with respect to a known potential.  The virtual ground circuit may be the issue. 

Edited by LittleWatchShop
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Measure the voltages at the pins of the LT1114 and post them here.  Measure with respect to the negative side of the battery.

When testing pins 7, Probes = Negative on Batt - , and Positive on pin 7

U5 = 8.99v, U2= 7v, U3= 7v, U4= 7V

When testing pins 4, Probes = Negative on Batt - , and Positive on pin 4

U5 = 8.99v, U2= 8.99v, U3= 8.99v, U4= 8.99v

9v exactly for input.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wlysenko said:

CWRNH: Nothing I make works the first time. Time to begin troubleshooting. First thing to do is measure voltages at pins 4 and 7 on all ICs to see if they are getting the proper power. If you have a signal generator, attach it to the input and look at the output of the first stage, preferably with an oscilloscope, but a voltmeter will work. U5 getting warm is not a good sign. For me, that often means a ruined IC because of a wiring error.

LittleWatchShop: Why do you want to measure voltage with respect to the negative battery terminal and not ground?

I can see the signal on the scope coming from the first IC pin 6 with power off.   Same as input signal, no change, which makes sense I guess because it is a buffer.  After that nothing on the rest.  I must have the floating ground wrong.  The only change I made from the original schematic was adding c19

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CWRNH said:

I can see the signal on the scope coming from the first IC pin 6 with power off.   Same as input signal, no change, which makes sense I guess because it is a buffer.  After that nothing on the rest.  I must have the floating ground wrong.  The only change I made from the original schematic was adding c19

I do have a couple signal generators and a few oscilloscopes.  I used the mic as my input though

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro.
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
    • I think attaching a nut to the lid to pull it off is the least destructive, any damage damage on the outside is going to an easier fix than any created when trying to push it out from the inside. Scratching up the inside of the lid , mainspring or arbor bearing will be risk. Just my opinion.
    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
×
×
  • Create New...