Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello all, I hope this post finds you all well!  I’ve been working on a small ladies watch with an FHF 60 movement.  I’ve cleaned and oiled the movement and replaced the balance assembly due to a bent pivot.  With the watch completely assembled, amplitude is almost non existent.  With the pallet fork removed, the gear train moves very well, with that slight reverse in motion evident in the escape wheel.  With the balance installed without the pallet fork , the wheel spins freely for quite some time, so no issue there either.  So at this point I believe I my loosing power through the pallet.  When I move the pallet back and for with watch wound I don’t get a good snap back and forth to the banking pins.    I don’t have much experience in escapement testing and adjusting.  My first thought is if the lock is to deep.  I thought it seemed ok, but would like to know what others with more knowledge on the subject think.  It’s hard to get pictures of both stones as one is quite hidden and a picture from the front through the inspection holes doesn’t show it very well.  Both stones are about the depth in the picture provided.  If this looks ok, any other tests that would be recommended?  I apologize if the picture quality isn’t great.

IMG_0733.png

Posted

The lock does look quite heavy, but I don't think it is the cause of your problem. If the fork is not snapping back and forth, then check the pallet fork pivots and holes are clean and smooth, and check the end-shake.

If you are sure the fork is moving freely, then focus on what you changed. Maybe there is interference between the guard pin and your new balance, or between the impulse jewel and the fork horns.

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi. Follow what klassiker said but also check the balance is free running. Take the fork out (remove power first). And fil balance and give it a puff of air,  does it swing ok for up to 25 secs freely.   Also check its pivots if it’s had a knock one of the levels may be broken or cracked.

  • Like 1
Posted

I agree with @Klassiker. Also, make sure that you do not oil the fork pivots. Have you oiled the pallet stone impulse surfaces? The type of oil that you use and how much can make a dramatic difference. Even dry impulse surfaces make a dramatic difference.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

No study of the cosmos, a test for the fork and balance assembly is to put  just the fork/cock  and balance/cock on the mainplate and observe, this will also provide wider angle of side view to see fork/ roller engagement.

 

 

Posted

With just the fork installed, no power, it should move easily with a light puff of air. Then, as you have already checked the balance freedom, check with fork in no power (without escape wheel would be best).

 

As said, no oil on the pivots, peg the jewels, no oil on the roller jewel (!), make sure the fork slot that interacts with the jewel is dead clean, also have a look at the roller jewel, they sometimes are grimy even after cleaning. While the lock does look a bit heavy, there's a whole checklist of things to examine before considering moving a/both stones or adjusting the bankings.

  • Like 3
Posted

Thanks everyone for your input!  So I removed and re-cleaned the pallet fork and its pivot jewels.  I don't oil fork pivots so there was no concern there.  As far as lubricating the pallet stones I use Moebius 9415 on the exit stone.  I've seen it applied to only the exit stone and also both stones as well.  Is one more acceptable than the other?  After cleaning again, the action of the fork seemed to be better, but with the balance installed it would still hardly run.  The only balance ran in horizontal positions, but not in vertical positions, so I decided to try the old balance to see if things would work better, and sure enough it did!  I swapped over the roller table to the new balance and it ran much better.  I will do some more comparison to see what the difference might be between the two tables causing the issue and post again shortly.  

Posted (edited)

From the photo, the pallet fork arbor jewel looks massively worn to me creating a big side-shake and a much deeper and shallower lock in vertical positions because of the excessive side shake reducing your amplitude because of that deep lock.  A shallow lock may cause mislocking

There should be no discernable or visible side shake, so if you give the pallet a wiggle and see the arbor visibly moving sideways, that is far from acceptable. There should be about 0.01 mm to 0.015 mm side shake of the pallet fork.

ovalled.jpg.7dd6d79b42ce02ff105b23056ebb2356.jpg

Edited by Jon
  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I believe @nickelsilver has a setup like that.
    • I posted pictures earlier in this thread. My lathe and mill are two separate instruments. I think I have seen examples of putting a milling head on a lathe bed...but not certain.
    • Timex Camper, September 1994, new to me. Strap is an old perlon with "Germany" in script etched into the resin on the tail end. Not Horlon or Eulit I believe. History unknown, running strong, losing less than a minute a day. Goals for this: Wear it a ton! Buy crystal lift, clean out the gunk around the ring and under the crystal Eventually swap into a stainless steel case. I've seen a member who has swapped a Timex mechanical movement into the Timex J.Crew quartz field watch case.
    • One of the problems we would have with a watchmaker's lathe is they were made over considerable span of time and manufacturing in the early days probably wasn't as good as it was today. Then if you look at the older catalogs typically it was just the head a few collets and something to rest graver on. So basically a basic lathe with over time things acquired but acquired things may or may not fit. Order today you purchase a used lathe that all kinds of nifty bits and pieces from a seller that acquired from? This would come back to that the basic watchmaker's lathe was used for basic watchmaking like turning things with a hand graver. Then limited indexing is fine because you can make things like stems Which don't need a whole bunch indexing   In the link above the word vector is mentioned and at the link below you can purchase one. Then of course you're going to need the motor that's a little bit extra for the price. https://www.hswalsh.com/product/lathe-vector-watchmakers-48-collets-hl11. That you're going to need some bonus parts like these found this picture online show the classic way of classic gear cutting.   The lathe could have a much bigger indexing disk but it has to be mounted close to the edge. Otherwise you're going to have a whole bunch of smaller disks like this which I think has notches rather than holes. Then as wonderful as these pictures look actually cutting a gear with this is not entirely fun. Look at all is belts all pulling on things and this is a watchmaker's lathe lightweight with lots of bits and pieces attached. It would make more sense if you actually cut a gear with something like this and it tends to be it's not really the best way to do it looks nice on paper but it is not the best way to go. Reality for cutting watch parts would be a bigger machine is much better. Than getting rid of all those belts and pulleys also good. Here is an interesting channel I would've liked of found a different video but this was nice and short if you look at his video as he uses a stepping motor and worm gear assembly for the indexing plate. In this particular video it gets attached to the lathe at about one minute and seven seconds and it looks like it's hiding looks like he has a Sherline. I do know he's had other stuff you'll just have to go through his videos to find it. Then at about one minute and 22 seconds you find out if you set up things appropriately. It's always bad we end up with half a tooth at the very end. Then you will note big lathe yes he's getting a big gear but you could easily cut a watch gear with the setup. And it definitely way more stable than a watchmaker's lathe.         Oh here's a company they been in business since 1911 http://www.fwderbyshireinc.com/  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
×
×
  • Create New...