Jump to content

Pallet fork problems?


Recommended Posts

Hello all, I hope this post finds you all well!  I’ve been working on a small ladies watch with an FHF 60 movement.  I’ve cleaned and oiled the movement and replaced the balance assembly due to a bent pivot.  With the watch completely assembled, amplitude is almost non existent.  With the pallet fork removed, the gear train moves very well, with that slight reverse in motion evident in the escape wheel.  With the balance installed without the pallet fork , the wheel spins freely for quite some time, so no issue there either.  So at this point I believe I my loosing power through the pallet.  When I move the pallet back and for with watch wound I don’t get a good snap back and forth to the banking pins.    I don’t have much experience in escapement testing and adjusting.  My first thought is if the lock is to deep.  I thought it seemed ok, but would like to know what others with more knowledge on the subject think.  It’s hard to get pictures of both stones as one is quite hidden and a picture from the front through the inspection holes doesn’t show it very well.  Both stones are about the depth in the picture provided.  If this looks ok, any other tests that would be recommended?  I apologize if the picture quality isn’t great.

IMG_0733.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lock does look quite heavy, but I don't think it is the cause of your problem. If the fork is not snapping back and forth, then check the pallet fork pivots and holes are clean and smooth, and check the end-shake.

If you are sure the fork is moving freely, then focus on what you changed. Maybe there is interference between the guard pin and your new balance, or between the impulse jewel and the fork horns.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With just the fork installed, no power, it should move easily with a light puff of air. Then, as you have already checked the balance freedom, check with fork in no power (without escape wheel would be best).

 

As said, no oil on the pivots, peg the jewels, no oil on the roller jewel (!), make sure the fork slot that interacts with the jewel is dead clean, also have a look at the roller jewel, they sometimes are grimy even after cleaning. While the lock does look a bit heavy, there's a whole checklist of things to examine before considering moving a/both stones or adjusting the bankings.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for your input!  So I removed and re-cleaned the pallet fork and its pivot jewels.  I don't oil fork pivots so there was no concern there.  As far as lubricating the pallet stones I use Moebius 9415 on the exit stone.  I've seen it applied to only the exit stone and also both stones as well.  Is one more acceptable than the other?  After cleaning again, the action of the fork seemed to be better, but with the balance installed it would still hardly run.  The only balance ran in horizontal positions, but not in vertical positions, so I decided to try the old balance to see if things would work better, and sure enough it did!  I swapped over the roller table to the new balance and it ran much better.  I will do some more comparison to see what the difference might be between the two tables causing the issue and post again shortly.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the photo, the pallet fork arbor jewel looks massively worn to me creating a big side-shake and a much deeper and shallower lock in vertical positions because of the excessive side shake reducing your amplitude because of that deep lock.  A shallow lock may cause mislocking

There should be no discernable or visible side shake, so if you give the pallet a wiggle and see the arbor visibly moving sideways, that is far from acceptable. There should be about 0.01 mm to 0.015 mm side shake of the pallet fork.

ovalled.jpg.7dd6d79b42ce02ff105b23056ebb2356.jpg

Edited by Jon
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks, ManSkirtBrew.  I started looking for a setup like yours and ran across this.  It was about half the price of the JKA Feintaster (depending on what auction you were in), and it's a Bergeon.  I bought it because I thought the price was fair (eBay - Buy it now), and I'm a sucker for vintage tools. It also has a table, so it should be easy to use for measuring jewels. I wonder if the the contact points can be changed out. Bergeon seems to manufacture new tables and accessories for the contemporary dial version. What do you guys think of it? I'm sorry this post seems to have taken a detour. I'm new here so let me know if I should start a new topic.
    • This is a flying cutter, usual one. The cutter itself is shown in the pictures in the first message, it is made of broken tungsten carbide drill bit. I asure that all the angles of the cutter are as they should be. I have video - little older one - that I made when onse making the same kind of winding pinion for a Poljot 2200, which is even smaller than this one. It is not easy to see in the video, but the tool rest moves about 1mm towards the object in Y direction and then returns back untill cutter is rotating. Then the spindle is rotated one tooth ahead and everything repeated untill all teeth are cut.
    • After a bit further research could it possibly be an AS 970?
    • Latest project was a non-running ebay purchase with an FHF70 movement. I stripped and cleaned it, reassembled it, and got it running. So far so good, nothing damaged AFAIK.  I was oiling the top jewel on the balance (the one in the cock) which was a slightly unusual shock setting. I removed the spring (3 leaves) which was part of a chaton holding the cap jewel. This left the hole jewel behind which I retrieved with rodico and then lost it. I was taking it off the rodico, very gently as I thought, with tweezers, and then it just disappeared.  Fast forward a week, I got a donor movement, non-running, with the plan to just take the shock jewel that I’d lost. It was the same movement but had standard incabloc settings, and was steel rather than copper/brass.  I changed the cock and balance complete and it ran, not very well. I switched the lower jewel setting, cleaned and oiled both jewels and the replacement balance. Without the pallet fork the balance swings very nicely with a puff of air. With the fork in place, balance out, it flicks side to side nicely with power in the mainspring.  Put them together and it doesn’t run. The impulse jewel sits in the fork and it stops.      Any suggestions how I proceed? In case you didn’t follow that I have 2 FHF70 movements, nothing broken as far as I can tell, but mixing up the balance wheels and jewel settings results in a non runner. 
    • Oh and this almost perfect third wheel pivot and slightly set mainspring  Ah ok yes i see what you mean, good idea. I'll try that if i fluff this one up. The image isn't great quality but i like the idea though.
×
×
  • Create New...