Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
26 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

Then I just pushed both stones in a touch, and gained about 40° : 275° DU/DD. CU/CD are both about 225° and clean plots. 

 

 

In the photo you showed of the entry stone it looked like it was fully seated with no room to push it in further. Was there some room that wasn't showing in the photo? What was your method for adjusting the stones?

Posted
35 minutes ago, GuyMontag said:

In the photo you showed of the entry stone it looked like it was fully seated with no room to push it in further. Was there some room that wasn't showing in the photo? What was your method for adjusting the stones?

There was just enough space - about the same on both sides. The shellac looks like the jewel - I've marked it in the pic. Now the lock looks closer to 1/3 width of the jewel. It was over 1/2

With too much lock, it's interesting to put some power on the mainspring, and move the fork with some pegwood. It becomes clear why you lose so much power: The fork has to be moved a long way before the stone unlocks, all the time the stone is pushing back against the escape wheel ("recoil"), trying to drive it back against the gear train. Hence loss of energy. There's a good explanation of energy losses in the escapement in Lesson 21 of  "The Chicago School of Watchmaking"

1.thumb.jpg.1e76196dd6dc1ed0f0a093d629593da7.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted
On 11/19/2022 at 6:15 AM, nickelsilver said:

If I ever get my hands on a demonstration escapement I'll try to redo it with photos.

Not so much getting your hands on one is robbing the bank to pay for one. I was kinda hoping some creative soul would design and then 3-D print and escapement model. Because it be so much easier to explain things if you had a visual aid like an escapement model.

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

I was kinda hoping some creative soul would design and then 3-D print and escapement model

Yes. That would be so much better than printing barrel closers. 😉

  • Like 1
Posted

 About twenty years ago, I missed a chance to buy an escapement demonstration model with adjustable pallet jewels, it sorta resembled the piece shown below.   Amplitude took off as the lock was reduced and yes behaved crazy when you kept playing  with the adjustor screws.

https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/a-captivating-collection-of-escapement-models-at-heritage-auctions-may-26th-sale

Of tens of times Nickelsilver has called for our attention to the subject, this thread provided an example to see the significance of it. 

Many thanks to Mike and Nickelsilver.

 

 

 

 

Posted

Here's an example of an escapement model for training purposes. As you can see brand-new from the Swiss with an interesting price. But it's not actually my favorite design for an escapement model.

http://www.wostep.ch/en/boutique#

Then this isn't exactly what I was looking for either but if you had a 3-D printer

https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3364860

Then while you're on the site do a search like the link below. Look at all the nifty stuff you could make if you'd a 3-D printer.

https://www.thingiverse.com/search?q=Escapement&page=1&type=things&sort=relevant

Then typically when I think escapement model I think of something that's features in a book. This book to be exact Know the Escapement Hardcover – by Sarah & Homer A. Barkus (Author). I also found a nice picture for you which I've attached this was a very popular and may still be very popular training  aid used in schools. Sometimes the book is sold with the model other times you'll find just the bottle all by itself and then a course the book can be purchased sometimes all by itself do yes some of the books do have a raised image of an escapement on the cover others are just a plain cover.

escapement model and book.JPG

  • Like 1
Posted
On 11/20/2022 at 3:25 AM, ifibrin said:

Is there any reason why this is so? Were such movements in the past just not adjusted out of the factory to have high amplitude, due to the excessive lock on the pallets?

I think the watch is set up to run initially with some margin of adjustment left in the escapement, simply because that's good practice, and they left the factory with good amplitude. After decades of use, slight invisible wear across the whole set of components can easily add up to a drop in amplitude. So it's nice that that little bit of adjustment is there.

Posted
3 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

I think the watch is set up to run initially with some margin of adjustment left in the escapement, simply because that's good practice, and they left the factory with good amplitude.

Good amplitude doesn't cut it for this group it has to be outstanding amplitude or else that's the problem.

I know people that work at the Swatch group service center. For anything like this they automatically just replace all the escapement components they don't even try to troubleshoot slightest hint of anything infinite supply of parts new escapement components. Then as far as regulation goes despite having detailed specifications like for Omega they only sort of fall of this. The words there given a window the watch has to do between this and this and all they have to do is hit the window and move on they do not regulate for zero seconds. It out even try to get close to zero seconds they just regulate the window and they go on.

So basically when you look at anything related the amplitude by the watch companies they're not concerned with a minimum amplitude or death they just don't what have too much amplitude and then they're concerned about amplitude at 24 hours but they're much more concerned about timekeeping. Of course if you have no amplitude are limited amplitude it 24 hours you usually have bad timekeeping is not ignoring the issue but that's not their obsession.

That if you look at some of the modern specifications though basically say that the majority the watches will fall into this group a certain percentage will fall out which of the range so I'm guessing they only spot check a few of the watches and by percentages some watches will be farther out of range than the rest.

I snipped out a image for you it comes from an internal Elgin watch company document dated about 1955 it's a nice book that explains how to give factory visits. It's divided into sections casual visitors versus jewelry store owners versus I think watchmakers in other words you get more and more technical stuff. There is a lot of overlap unfortunately no pictures it would've been nice to have pictures but no pictures just Words.

Now why am I giving you this well let's read through amplitude specifications. They did have a timing machine that measured rate so they would look at the rate of the watch but notice on the amplitude they basically visually look at it and look at the turns that the balance wheels making. Then yes I always find turns confusing versus amplitude I'll let you figure out what a turn is.

So you'll notice too much amplitude they put a weaker mainspring and. Then yes if you look in the Elgin parts book at one time they did have watch mainsprings that were weaker than the regular spring. Even Rolex had variations in mainsprings strength if they perceive there were issues. But notice what happens if they don't have enough amplitude somebody gets to look at the watch and possibly adjust the escapement.


 

 

 

Elgin watch company 1955 amplitude checking.JPG

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Interesting, thanks for the detailed post. I saw one of those Swiss Nano machines a while back in another youtube video from  the Weiss Watch Company.
    • Hello and welcome to the fo4um. Enjoy
    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy.
    • You're asking a pretty broad question and you didn't specify the machine but yes it's simple especially if you have the right machine. The question has problems but I'll take it as it is. Is it really that simple yes especially if you have the right machine. So in the video below he's making a screw and yes it really is that simple but pay attention to the machine it is not simple at all probably wasn't cheap but it is small it will probably fit in your garage. Unfortunately wouldn't fit in my garage as it's far too cluttered up with things. In the video he talks about making a screw and pay attention to the machine. The machine has lots and lots and lots of cutters and lots of things to do lots of machining all-in-one machine conceivably one step after another all programmable. If you look at his channel lots of CNC's stuff and there are several other videos related to this machine. He goes to the factory where they talk about it and show all the other machines they make in Switzerland.  I did look up the specifications the machine I don't recall the price it's not going to cut wheels I think it has a maximum diameter around 11 mm basically it's really good for making small diameter watch parts. Then in one of the other videos he goes to a factory that used to make parts with waterpowered machinery been in business for 100 years and everything they now make is made with CNC machines including this one. What was interesting with the factory photo was that when they make some parts they can put them on a optical comparator comparator compares with whatever the reference is and the machine can be programmed to adjust its cutting to make sure everything is actually being made to specifications. Oh and then somewhere in all of this there was at least one picture of a balance staff can't have a CNC Swiss machine without making balance staffs.   It would be really nice if we had pictures of the machine. Then yes if you look at the page for wheel cutting you can enter parameters and it will generate a G code but he left out things? Notice he has a picture of a complete wheel but the G code isn't making a complete wheel it's only cutting the gear teeth I don't see whereas the program for crossing out the spokes? Typically when you see people cutting gears once the teeth are cut most the time the spokes are cut by hand. Occasionally someone will mill them out but typically not with the program which seems strange if you have CNC capability for instance one of my friends fill it used to design assembly line equipment or things to make things. So his hobby was to continue to make tools to make things like clocks. Very interesting and clever clocks but his true fund was making the machines to make the clocks. Then machine is not controlled by G code like we would typically find today as the stepping motor controller he has was made a long time ago and the individual controllers used a textbased program. So the company had a editor you could write a program to cause each the stepping motors to do something. So basically once you figure out how to cut a gear he would just change the parameters for different size gears so here's an example of a gear as you can see we have the teeth and the spokes. Then we have a picture the machine which sucks because it would've been so much nicer if I could've taken a picture when it was cutting a gears so we can see things better. Then yes there is a worm gear stepping motor indexing this is a mini lathe and the indexing is at the end of the lathe head hiding. The basic operation of this machine would be brass sheet not cut to a specific diameter size not even round mounted on the machine. Then it turns and a milling cutter will cut the diameter. Then the gear would be cut with a gear cutter. The same mill cutter for the diameter although conceivably change the size I don't know but basically the same milling for cutting the outer diameter would be used to cut the spokes. I really can't remember how he did the center hole but whatever it was was very precise.          
    • Yeah I know the site and the creator of it.  the two video clips are good examples of the quicker method and a full tear down.  the quick method will work in many cases. But not always and not for all the different movements.  I strongly suggest to not bend the four tabs as was done in the first clip.  Instead there are three tabs that insert into the top plate, Much saver way as to not break a tab.
×
×
  • Create New...