Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I'm doing a service on a very pretty 6s Elgin, and I got to taking out the mainspring, and it looks like this:

PXL_20220309_040901970.thumb.jpg.5eca650658be7280fcb727456521d6b3.jpg

It seems like it uncoiled way too small, although I haven't worked on another 6s, only larger size 12/16/18 pocket watch movements.

Does that mean the spring is worn out and needs to be replaced?

Edit: here's the whole movement

PXL_20220309_032410817.thumb.jpg.fe1df96a6c5830b70694245c1400a6eb.jpg

Edited by kibbler
adding photo
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

It does look pretty tired. If you can get the correct replacement, then I would change it, otherwise you may spend ages chasing low amplitude problems and erratic running only to have to strip the movement and replace it any way. At least if you replace it you know it is good, and if there are issues they lie elsewhere. I see the regulator is fully to one side, this may be because the spring is unable to maintain a good rate.

I did see one (old stock) on ebay, so this may give you the size, assuming it is the same movement. I'm not sure I would fit a new old stock one if there is a modern replacement available. What would other forum members suggest? Have they had any issues with new old stock springs? Do these things have a shelf life?

image.thumb.png.65106b11bed2dd62e6717d606b90a5fd.png

That is a nice looking movement, do you have any pictures of the watch?

 

Edited by AndyHull
Posted

That spring needs to be replaced. If I could imagine myself as a mainspring that is me at the end of each day bloody knackered and ready for bed. 🤣 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, kibbler said:

Is it better or worse to get a modern alloy mainspring over a NOS one?

 

https://www.jewelerssupplies.com/elgin-mainspring-6-size-MS-JA112.html

Alloy springs are less likely to break, and generally (not always) have a very slight increase in power for the same thickness. If you find an old stock Elgin alloy spring that's great- they pretty much invented the alloy and it's still produced and used for high tech stuff: Elgiloy.

 

To be honest that spring looks ok to me. An old rule of thumb is if it opens up bigger than twice the size of the barrel when taken out it's ok. But an alloy spring will be safer; if a mainspring breaks at full wind it can damage other parts of the gearing.

  • Like 3
Posted

I was on the fence here, to start.  Without the spring in front of me, it's a tough thing to really diagnose well.  As Nickelsilber stated, in the picture it doesn't *look* too bad.  I think it could have expanded a bit larger in the unwound state, judging by its barrel next to it, but it doesn't seem all that tired.
Yet, as we all know, how the spring makes the watch *perform* is the important issue, not how it looks.  Not knowing what its performance was before makes me want to give my default advice: if you can get an alloy replacement, I'd go for it.  An NOS alloy replacement is probably the ideal situation here.  Fewer worries for the future, and the performance of the watch will likely improve.

  • Like 3
Posted
2 hours ago, KarlvonKoln said:

Yet, as we all know, how the spring makes the watch *perform* is the important issue, not how it looks.  Not knowing what its performance was before makes me want to give my default advice: if you can get an alloy replacement, I'd go for it.

The watch was running very erratically, and would stop randomly.  Listening to the beat by ear, if it was a person, I would say they were having a heart attack.

On the other hand, the watch was pretty dirty, and who knows when the last time it was serviced.

I was thinking if the spring looked obviously tired, I would save the trouble and time of cleaning, reassembling, and diagnosing before ordering a mainspring.  I just don't know exactly what I'm looking for at this point.

Posted

I guess the only way to know if the old spring works is to give it a try.

I would clean everything, lubricate and reassemble. It shouldn't then be much of a chore to fit the old spring, test it, and if the results are poor, with low amplitude, despite the cleaning remove and replace the old spring.

 

Posted

If its your watch go ahead and reinstall it and see how it works. As long as it keeps time from morning to evening you're good.

If you are servicing this for money then replace the mainspring as a matter of course.

On a side note, this is a seven jewel movement so it will have higher friction and this translates into more mainspring power required.

Anilv

Posted

Personally, I wouldn't go to all the trouble of removing the old main spring and then putting it back in there again, because it will have seen many, many better days.

Replace it with a brand new one.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • interesting video nice to see the machine what it can do now I wonder what it costs and I'm sure it's not in my budget. Plus the video brought up questions but the website below answers the questions? What was bothering me was the size of his machine 4 mm because I thought it was bigger than that? But then it occurred to me that maybe they had variations it looks like four, seven and 10. With the seven and 10 being the best because way more tool positions in way more rotating tools. Although I bet you all the rotating tools are probably separate cost https://www.tornos.com/en/content/swissnano   Then as we been talking about Sherline. Just so that everyone's aware of this they have another division their industrial division where you can buy bits and pieces. I have a link below that shows that just in case you don't want to have the entire machine you just need bits and pieces. https://www.sherline.com/product-category/industrial-products-division/   Let's see what we can do with the concept I explained up above and bits and pieces. For one thing you can make a really tiny gear very tiny like perhaps you're going to make a watch. Then another version the center part is not separate it is all machined from one piece. Then fills gear cutting machines have gone through multiple of evolutions. A lot of it based on what he wanted to make like he was going to make a watch unfortunately eyesight issues have prevented that. Another reason why you should start projects like this much sooner when your eyesight is really good or perhaps start on watches first and then move the clocks then local we have from the industrial division? Looks like two separate motors and heads. Then it's hard to see but this entire thing is built on top of a much larger milling machine as a larger milling machine gave a very solid platform to build everything.   Then like everything else that had multiple generations are versions the indexing went through of course variations like above is one version and the one below was the last version. Now the version below I mentioned that previously and somewhere in the beginning to discussion and somebody else had one in their picture. As it is a really nice precision indexing. Then I wasn't sure if I had a the watch photos here is his unfinished watch. No he wasn't going to make a simple watch like none of his clocks were simply either what would be the challenge and that.    
    • Use a Portwest Howie lab coat. They are the biological type so they have tapped cuffs so you don't end up getting the loose cuffs of normal lab coats catching everything. 
    • Some of the Chinese tools ae great and can be purchased at a fraction of the price of Swiss ones, some are complete garbage and some I'm convinced are coming out the same factory as the branded ones.
    • I found this string about this problem. I've not gone through it all, but I believe it also mentions making a spring. If not in this string, the info is online.
    • No, I now realise it’s broken😥 ive looked for one online, but v. Expensive! im going to service as is, in the hope that  one turns up. Thank  you.
×
×
  • Create New...