Jump to content

Is this mainspring worn out?


Recommended Posts

I'm doing a service on a very pretty 6s Elgin, and I got to taking out the mainspring, and it looks like this:

PXL_20220309_040901970.thumb.jpg.5eca650658be7280fcb727456521d6b3.jpg

It seems like it uncoiled way too small, although I haven't worked on another 6s, only larger size 12/16/18 pocket watch movements.

Does that mean the spring is worn out and needs to be replaced?

Edit: here's the whole movement

PXL_20220309_032410817.thumb.jpg.fe1df96a6c5830b70694245c1400a6eb.jpg

Edited by kibbler
adding photo
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does look pretty tired. If you can get the correct replacement, then I would change it, otherwise you may spend ages chasing low amplitude problems and erratic running only to have to strip the movement and replace it any way. At least if you replace it you know it is good, and if there are issues they lie elsewhere. I see the regulator is fully to one side, this may be because the spring is unable to maintain a good rate.

I did see one (old stock) on ebay, so this may give you the size, assuming it is the same movement. I'm not sure I would fit a new old stock one if there is a modern replacement available. What would other forum members suggest? Have they had any issues with new old stock springs? Do these things have a shelf life?

image.thumb.png.65106b11bed2dd62e6717d606b90a5fd.png

That is a nice looking movement, do you have any pictures of the watch?

 

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, kibbler said:

Is it better or worse to get a modern alloy mainspring over a NOS one?

 

https://www.jewelerssupplies.com/elgin-mainspring-6-size-MS-JA112.html

Alloy springs are less likely to break, and generally (not always) have a very slight increase in power for the same thickness. If you find an old stock Elgin alloy spring that's great- they pretty much invented the alloy and it's still produced and used for high tech stuff: Elgiloy.

 

To be honest that spring looks ok to me. An old rule of thumb is if it opens up bigger than twice the size of the barrel when taken out it's ok. But an alloy spring will be safer; if a mainspring breaks at full wind it can damage other parts of the gearing.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was on the fence here, to start.  Without the spring in front of me, it's a tough thing to really diagnose well.  As Nickelsilber stated, in the picture it doesn't *look* too bad.  I think it could have expanded a bit larger in the unwound state, judging by its barrel next to it, but it doesn't seem all that tired.
Yet, as we all know, how the spring makes the watch *perform* is the important issue, not how it looks.  Not knowing what its performance was before makes me want to give my default advice: if you can get an alloy replacement, I'd go for it.  An NOS alloy replacement is probably the ideal situation here.  Fewer worries for the future, and the performance of the watch will likely improve.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KarlvonKoln said:

Yet, as we all know, how the spring makes the watch *perform* is the important issue, not how it looks.  Not knowing what its performance was before makes me want to give my default advice: if you can get an alloy replacement, I'd go for it.

The watch was running very erratically, and would stop randomly.  Listening to the beat by ear, if it was a person, I would say they were having a heart attack.

On the other hand, the watch was pretty dirty, and who knows when the last time it was serviced.

I was thinking if the spring looked obviously tired, I would save the trouble and time of cleaning, reassembling, and diagnosing before ordering a mainspring.  I just don't know exactly what I'm looking for at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the only way to know if the old spring works is to give it a try.

I would clean everything, lubricate and reassemble. It shouldn't then be much of a chore to fit the old spring, test it, and if the results are poor, with low amplitude, despite the cleaning remove and replace the old spring.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If its your watch go ahead and reinstall it and see how it works. As long as it keeps time from morning to evening you're good.

If you are servicing this for money then replace the mainspring as a matter of course.

On a side note, this is a seven jewel movement so it will have higher friction and this translates into more mainspring power required.

Anilv

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I wouldn't go to all the trouble of removing the old main spring and then putting it back in there again, because it will have seen many, many better days.

Replace it with a brand new one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hell0 @nevenbekriev. Thank you for your advice. I have removed the old setting using my staking set--I will keep the KIF spring, since it is still good.  I am awaiting the replacement setting, and will update when I do that. In the mean time, I looked at the escape wheel and it looks ok. What do you think?    
    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
    • So I found what I believe is the setting lever screw! Am I right in thinking the screw next to the click is the correct one for the setting lever? However if it is, it doesn't fit in the hole which I believe is for it! I can get the lever to sit nicely on the stem and line up with a hole, but the screw only goes as far as the shoulder and stops. It's as though the hole is too small! The dial side has been disassembled by the way, the other wheels are in my tray
×
×
  • Create New...