Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Texas. Merry Christmas and a very happy new year.

 

Shortening the length makes it run faster. 

Adjusting through the balance weights can work to the same effect, but usualy if its only by few minutes a day.

So, how slow does it run? 

What is the diameter of the coil, also measure the  distance from jewel hole in cock setting to the stud, in other words we should take into account how far is the outermost circle of the coil from the stud. we wouldn't want hairspring hitting on stud as it breaths.

I' be happy to work with till you get the right beat.

Joe

 

 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Shortening the length makes it run faster. 

It is an overcoil, so I will have to shorten it at the collet.  Never tried that!

 

16 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Adjusting through the balance weights

I thought that might help...and closer to my abilities at this stage.

 

17 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

What is the diameter of the coil

I will measure and get back to you.

 

17 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

I' be happy to work with till you get the right beat.

Great.  I am heading out of town for a week, so will not get back to this until after Christmas.

 

18 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Merry Christmas and a very happy new year

Back to you!  I hope next year is better for the whole world.  COVID has managed to suck the fun out of life for a couple of years--thankful for my retreat to watchmaking as it keeps me home!

Posted

 I just saw your vid, its way too slow, yes this hairspring might be incompatible with this balance, that doesn't mean it can't  produce the required beat, you are likely to end up with a very small  coil which probably osciilates unstable in dynamic state.

 

Posted

You need to sort out the amplitude a bit. Your video is showing somewhere in the region of 180 to 190 degrees so timing is going to be somewhat difficult, you need to be hitting a very minimum of 220 degrees.

Then before you start altering anything irreversibly take a really close look at the balance. Has somebody added any extra weight (timing washers) in the past to slow it down.

If the H/S comes pre-studded for a particular calibre then it should be reasonably close unless the balance wheel has been messed about with. Afterall there would be little point in supplying it studded if you're only going to have to remove the stud and re-attach it having shortened the H/S

  • Thanks 1
Posted

All good comments.  After Christmas, I will do a thorough analysis of the balance assembly.  I have more hairsprings, but they are mostly all the same model and for the same model movement.

This was an ebay find many months ago.  No telling what has been done to the watch in the past. It is missing the sweep second pinion, so there is less load on the train than normally would exist.  Hard to imagine that is an issue.

I wonder...could the mainspring be too strong?  I did a full clean and did not notice the mainspring to be out of the ordinary.  I have services several others of this vintage.  Hmmm...maybe swap the balance assy between one of the others...that is a thought.

1 hour ago, Marc said:

If the H/S comes pre-studded for a particular calibre

Yes it was.

Posted

Is the terminal curve sitting between the index pins on the regulator ok?

And what is the history of the watch? Knackered hairspring?

Posted
1 hour ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I wonder...could the mainspring be too strong?

If this was the case then you would expect to see very high amplitude or even re-banking (where the balance amplitude is so high that the impulse jewel crashes into the outside of the fork horns). Your problem is the opposite, the balance wheel amplitude is too low, which could be as a result of too weak a main spring, or excessive losses within the train or the escapement, or both.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I first tried my best to enlarge the pic and zoom on oscilator but no joy, then I noticed the big amplitude, based on which I think this hairspring is way too long, so way too slow. 

Educational to me as to how did Mark came up with 190 for amplitude. 

Then to test for in beat, start with the oscilator at rest, swing the balance by few degrees like 10 to 15 , if its out of beat by 90 it fails to recieve the impulse so the oscilation dewindles to stop.

Can you show a good close up of the oscilator?

Posted
17 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

is an overcoil, so I will have to shorten it at the collet.  Never tried that!

Definitely not recommended as they were made in a very specific shape and you weren't supposed to play with the shape.   They were premade for a reason so you don't want to screw your hairspring up playing with it.

19 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Could it be that it is the wrong balance wheel? 

If you look in the Waltham parts book the hairspring you have this for balance wheel number 26116. Which looks like it probably is the right balance wheel so that's definitely the right hairspring but what are you not paying attention to?

Typically with balance wheels hairsprings are not available as a separate component. This is because the hairspring has to be vibrated to every single balance wheels. The only time hairsprings are available as a separate component typically was if they were pre-made too exacting specifications like with an over coil. That means you have to match the balance wheel to the hairspring which is why it has timing screws.  This is where typically when hairsprings were separate like American pocket watches you can also purchase timing screws.

 

Posted
15 hours ago, rodabod said:

Is the terminal curve sitting between the index pins on the regulator ok?

Yes, appears to be fine.

 

15 hours ago, rodabod said:

And what is the history of the watch? Knackered hairspring?

Got the watch on Ebay and the hairspring was completely destroyed.  I have been waiting for many months to find a hairspring and just found some on Ebay.  This is a new install of a NOS hairspring that is correct for this cal watch.

 

15 hours ago, Marc said:

If this was the case then you would expect to see very high amplitude or even re-banking

Roger that!  The problem, at least first order, was the beat.

 

12 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

From the vid if the roller jewel is 90 degrees from the arms it's massively out of beat too

Bingo.  The collet was off by roughly 20 degrees.  A rookie mistake!!  I have adjusted it and now it is close (I can make it run a little fast or a little slow, but it is still a little erratic. 

 

7 hours ago, anilv said:

Looks like the pivots are gummed up. have you tried running the balance without the hairspring?

I have cleaned the watch fully and both top and bottom jewels were removed and cleaned.  I did not notice any issues with the pivots, but I will go back and take a look.

Posted
6 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

If you look in the Waltham parts book the hairspring you have this for balance wheel number 26116. Which looks like it probably is the right balance wheel so that's definitely the right hairspring but what are you not paying attention to?

As noted in my previous reply--the balance was out of beat.  Significant screwup on my part, but hey...I am still on this journey.

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
    • After cleaning up the pivots, I made bushes on the lathe. At this point I've pressed in 6 bushes (3 sets) and the wheels turn smooth. What I can also tell you, is that I'm not looking forward to final assembly. Getting the pivots aligned seems to get exponentially more difficult with each wheel that is added.
    • Islands are interesting places to live depending upon their size and other factors. This is a bigger island and it has a bridge to get there at least on one end. It's also big enough that you don't have to go someplace else to get things typically. It can be a problem if you get a job in Seattle though. Yes I've known of people who commuted from the island to Seattle for a job and I don't quite remember how many hours it took but it took a long time. So basically islands are nice if you don't have to leave very often.
    • Thanks @JohnR725! Everything you say makes a lot of sense and is encouraging to read.
    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
×
×
  • Create New...