Jump to content

First service of Lady's watch


Recommended Posts

I've worked on a few mechanicals that size.  One of them that comes to mind was a little Kingston with an FHF-60, and another was a Seiko with a 4206B.  And that Seiko was crammed full: sweep second, automatic plus day and date, all in that tiny little package.  They aren't really much different to work on than larger movements.  Like you all mention, the small size is the main thing that presents challenges.  And I am sad, also, that some of these miniature marvels don't get more respect, and aren't in greater demand.

I do have a daughter, though, who adores the little cocktail watches.  She's seen the ones that I've worked upon.  I am looking for a vintage one that suits her, as a gift.  She will likely cherish it more than anyone else has in a long time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Worked on a few ladies watches. Don't think I could do it if I didn't work under the microscope.

 One was the only Rolex I've serviced, a Cal 2230, 20mm dia. automatic. Gave me palpitations handling the balance 😨But it was a beautiful movement to work on. It's the only movement I've worked on that didn't need any adjusting after a service.

The hardest I've worked on is an Omega Cal 455, 16mm dia, automatic, with a sweep second. Very fiddly
I still have it, waiting for a new balance, as I trashed the hairspring trying to adjust it.
The hairspring is about 3mm diameter, so even with the smallest tweezers, it's not really possibly to tweak it (well not for me)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just finished one of these movements in an Avia ladies watch.  Was impressed how well made the movement was.  All parts nicely polished and even had adjustable beat error on the regulator. Got really good amplitude and zero beat error after a bit of fiddling.  After letting it settle down through a full run time cycle (46 hrs!) and another full wind there was no discernable gain or loss over 36 hrs, very impressive. Not got any pics unfortunately.  Only downside was single top plate for barrel and gear train, so a little delicate fiddling required. I do  lot of ladies watches, small calibers, so now used to the very small parts.  Makes larger calibers seem massive afterwards!!!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The 73 was my setting lever make Mike, same piece fitted to your 72. I enjoyed working on the movement, fair quality. 73 wasn't front loading,but a tight spacer ring that i had to fit onto the movement before casing up. I had to adjust endshake on the third wheel  so apart from the make everthing else was good. 
    • Well it's arrived, and it's a pleasant surprise. A 11.5''' 21 jewel FHF 72. It's running (just) and looks in great condition.  It needs a good service, and new crown and strap.  It's a front loader but doesn't have a split stem. There's a small lever (visible when you remover the bezel), which when moved, frees the stem and the movement from the case (a new one on me).  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • Hi All, I'm Geoff and I've been working on/with watches and clocks since I was thirteen. My dad was a watchmaker and while he did not want me in the field as a profession, I've always maintained a pretty good working knowledge. In the '70's I kinda got pulled back into things because Quartz revolution began and he only had limited electronic knowledge. So we combined skills. He the watchmaker and me the electronics tech. Being here in NY helped because we got to know the folks from Bulova, Seiko, Citizen, and WOSIC. H.B. Freid was my Dad's teacher and I was fortunate enough to get to know him too. I still maintain a bench here at home and occasionally work on watches for friends although the hands aren't what they used to be. Not going to be working on any FHF59 or AS1012's any time soon. Oddly enough though my years working with the field taught me how to work on almost anything else mechanical and mostly electronic. Since I was the one in the family who maintained Dad's cleaning and timing machines. those experiences carried over quite nicely into the worlds of recording and audio as well as others. I look forward to the discussions and maybe still learning a trick or two. Cheers to all and nice to be here.  
    • The best and almost only way to achieve the magical £ 4.04 individual watch cost is via the loophole ploy of job lot buys Ross. Dividing down the outlay by the number of watches purchased. I've managed it many times in the past, this then gives you the extra edge of choosing any watch from that lot. Maybe we should have an all time winner, whos prepared to troll  through the last four years of posts and pick some worthy contenders. Unfortunately i have a poorly shoulder so i cant raise my right hand and my left shoulder is out in sympathy for my right shoulder. Put your right hand up if you think i talk a load of bull 💩     🖐 Tom's comment is purely restricted to  the Bergeon culture of " lets rip off everyone on the planet " Voted , i thought to keep it in pounds as originally designed and out of respect for Andy . Personally i would have kept the £4.04 as I'm very traditionalist and dont like change but i know how hard you overseas guys are finding it and i believe in fair play. I expect to be posting the occasional Omega or Longines but then you brought this on yourself so dont get jealous Scott 😆
×
×
  • Create New...