Jump to content

Lemania 1340 Main Spring?


Hoe

Recommended Posts

Dear all

While servicing a Lemania 1340, I wanted to use the chance to renew the main spring, although the original still seems fine.

I assumed that the Lemania 1340 is the same as Omega’s 1040 and looked up the mainspring size here, URL:

https://watchguy.co.uk/cgi-bin/mainsprings

So I ordered GR2681X  (1.10 x .135 x 460 x 12 Automatic) from CousinsUK. But now, the centre of the new one seems to have a larger diameter than the original. The barrel arbour will not fit unless I bend the main spring.

Did I order the wrong main spring?

Thanks

 

 

Lemania_1340_main_spring.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi To check out the sizes I should have a look at Ranfft's web site and check out the dimensions given for each model.  You can always recoil the spring center to fit the arbour using round nose pliers to avoid kinking the spring.

Omega  1.05 X 12.0 X 0.10

Lemania  1.05 x 12.0 X 0.10

Both springs are the same so alter the center coil to fit.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're thinking metal to jewel in general I guess. Maybe it would be a good idea to peg the pallet jewel hole on the main plate after the epilame treatment. I think that could work as it is my impression that the epilame doesn't sit very hard, but I could be wrong about that so feel free to educate me. I didn't remember that 9501 was thixotropic (thanks for the link). That would mean it's even runnier during impact (lower viscosity) so perhaps it's time I get some fresh grease as mine seems a bit too runny. What I have seen is a whitish surface after washing but it goes away if I scrub the surface with a brush in a degreaser (Horosolv). I don't think it embeds itself in the metal but sticks very hard to the metal. I don't worry too much about the cleaning solution. I just want perfectly clean parts and my solution can be replaced for little money (ELMA RED 1:9). Anyway, I quite often need "to strip back and rebuild" and scrubbing parts by hand isn't exactly the most stimulating part of a service.
    • I’ve had a couple movements where it is clear the previous watchmaker was diligent with lubrication but the old epilam had turned to a fine white powder covering the pallet fork and keyless parts, which can’t be good for parts. I’m spare with epi since I don’t know how long it takes to degrade to that state…
    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro. I thought the idea was for the epilame to create a barrier, a wall between the lubrication and anything else, so the lube cant spread.
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
    • I think attaching a nut to the lid to pull it off is the least destructive, any damage damage on the outside is going to an easier fix than any created when trying to push it out from the inside. Scratching up the inside of the lid , mainspring or arbor bearing will be risk. Just my opinion.
×
×
  • Create New...