Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok, since today was my introduction to "jewel" issues, I decided to open up the two boxes my Dad left to me.  Identical Seitz jeweling sets.  I think between the two, I have a complete set.  What I need help with is the numbering system (measurement system) so that I can organize all of the components into the right slots.

I found a link to a Seitz brochure/manual on this forum.  It is helpful, but does not answer the measurement question.  I have figured out the reamers because they are stamped.

 

2021-07-03 19_43_20-Photos.png

2021-07-03 19_43_41-Photos.png

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

What I need help with is the numbering system (measurement system) so that I can organize all of the components into the right slots.

I think those are measured in hundreds of a mm (Metric millimeters).
As an example I can show the 295, I use a micrometer to measure these exactly.

Here we can se the reading 2.5 + 0.45 = 2.95, in hundreds this make 2.95/ 0.01 = 295.
The types you find in the manual so now you can go on sorting them out.

Size.thumb.png.a87de13bbca685e4622224a4bc560c3d.png

Edited by HSL
clearer picture
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I suspect you'll probably find that the numbers are in metric. Probably has something to do with the fact this is made by a Swiss company. Typically the Swiss like metric.

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, jdm said:

Shockingly even some American watch factories did, already in 1868
https://www.google.it/books/edition/Research_Report_Number_1_71/AvMcAQAAMAAJ?gbpv=1&pg=PA59

always one of the confusing things in watch repair is isn't just inches or metric there's also some other measurements. Did notice the reference that Elgin is still using inches?

the other place where this really comes up is mainsprings I snipped out some things you can see the Elgin mainspring part numbers the second part of the number is the thickness of the spring in inches. Just because there isn't enough confusion already with mainsprings in metric, Dennison and inches for length Elgin has to have inches for thickness.

 

Elgin mainspring inches.JPG

Posted

There are few versions of this tool.  From what I've gathered, the oldest ones use Ø3mm pushers, which are hard to find.  Current tools and the pushers that are still made are 4mm.

On the newest ones that cap on the head of the stake is threaded on and can be removed.  A smaller cap is placed on the stake and a solid top piece is threaded into internal threads on the micrometer adjusting barrel.  The handle is removed.  This allows the stake to be pushed down by turning the micrometer barrel.  On the tools without this feature the stake and its cap is a single piece and there are no internal threads on the micrometer.

My set is a little different than pictured.  The "reducing ring" on the right end of the 3rd row is missing and there is no space for it.  I don't know what it's for.

SeitzStumps.thumb.jpg.5cf18f24c1aa098f10aac350803c54b4.jpg

Posted

Check the reamers for damage and replace any that show damage, they are not that expensive, only a few pounds each from Cousins.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Check the anvils on these sets. The oldest have 3mm anvils and 4mm pushers, and the newest 4mm anvils and 4mm pushers. Cousins have only 4mm anvils(and pushers.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 7/4/2021 at 5:44 PM, xyzzy said:

There are few versions of this tool.  From what I've gathered, the oldest ones use Ø3mm pushers, which are hard to find.  Current tools and the pushers that are still made are 4mm.

I discovered that the two tools I have ARE different.  The base that holds the stump are two different size holes.  I measured one to be 4mm and the other is smaller--guessing 3mm.

Posted

I received the Bergeon lanterning pusher and stake for cannon pinion lanterning.  Here they are on my Seitz jeweling tool.

More likely to be fixing cannon pinions than jeweling in the near term.

2021-07-12 14_38_24-IMG_7428.JPG ‎- Photos.png

Posted
35 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I love the wooden box.  Also, yours appears to be made of a ferrous metal whereas mine is aluminum.

use the early one is made out of something like steel or cast iron definitely heavy.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Excellent info, thank you! So when you say "conforms to the standard" does that mean, for example, that parts are interchangeable between brands and ages, or that you could use accessories built for that 110-year old one on a newer one that was built in the 1990s? Also, thank you for taking the time to answer my questions and your patience.
    • It was first a brand, but became a standardized style. So you will find some older lathes actually marked "Webster Whitcomb" and many other makers who built WW lathes conforming to the same dimensions for spindle height, bed shape, attachment setup, collet size and design. https://www.lathes.co.uk/derbyshire/ So when someone mentions a WW lathe today, they are talking about any lathe that conforms to the standard, which could be a 110 year old American made lathe or a European made lathe from the 1960s or something else.
    • Hi guys, just a little thank you for the CLOCKBARN site in America.  I purchased a TIMETRAX APMLIFIER to help with setting clocks in beat from CLOCKBARN it arrived on time and when tested worked ok.  A week later I had occasion to need it again, this time nothing the unit was dead. Checked out batteries , probes etc , nothing.    I messaged CLOCKBARN  to this effect.  I got a prompt reply that he would send a replacement which duly arrived today and having tested it it’s ok.  So I can recommend the site should you need to use it. The person,persons who run it are genuine guys.  So thank you CLOCKBARN  for your excellent service.
    • Hi there! You have learned how professional watchmakers feel about Timex. It is very difficult to find one willing to work on them, for a few reasons: 1) a lot of them wrongly believe Timex cannot be serviced, are riveted together. This is a myth. 2) when serviced, they still cannot meet the performance standards of jeweled mechanical watches (-20sec/day is good enough for a Timex) 3) customers are unwilling to pay the watchmaker's hourly bench rates because the watches are worth very little The service manual for the M33 is available at https://heritage1854.com/m33 but you also need the M32 and M31 manuals because they build on each other (31 is the base, 32 has date, 33 has day and date) https://heritage1854.com/m31 https://heritage1854.com/m32 A stuck date changeover can be due to a missing, bent or broken detent spring (part 2576 in the manual) or the date wheel (2556) got stuck or separated from its post, or maybe disengaged from the hour wheel. With a little confidence, these are not difficult to repair and parts are pretty much interchangeable with any other Timex from the same era having the same features. So it is very easy to find inexpensive spares in the form of junk watches (don't bother trying to search for individual spare parts). My recommendation would be to find a junk Timex with an M25 (older manual wind with date) and practice a little with it. Follow the service manual from the same website. The automatics are a bit more difficult to work on but once you get a feel for how they fit together, you can make an attempt at your automatic and you would be able to use many spare parts from the M25 if necessary. To work with most Timex movements, you do not need a lot of tools. Just one screwdriver, 1.4mm is a good size, tweezers, and hand levers to remove the hands plus hand pusher tools to replace them. Of course if you want to do a full cleaning and restoration more is needed. But to get it apart and diagnose, only minimal tools.
    • I do indeed have some programming and electronics know-how. 3 decades writing code for a living, and playing with microcontrollers as a hobby. 🙂 It helps with my actual living of being a voice actor because I can maintain my own equipment- no one around to replace the caps or the tube in an obscure botique mic that isn't made or supported any longer. Also saves money maintaining and cleaning my own interfaces and mixers when they develop problems in the faders and such. That said... I do have a question that, I'm sure, will betray my ignorance about certain areas that I have yet to fill in. I understand a "WW" lathe is a "Webster Whitcomb", but from what I understand that is a style of lathe and not a brand, correct? If someone would be willing to clarify and maybe expand on the terminology, it would be helpful so I can better understand the advice being given and know what I need to look into to further my knowledge. For example, a Sherline mill would appear to be either a separate piece of gear or an attachment/expansion to their smaller lathe. When you say you have a WW lathe and a sherline mill, can you say exactly what devices you have? Thank you! (I just realized I have a few Raspberry Pis and some Arduinos of various form factors around here I could probably put to good use in a scenario like you describe above).  
×
×
  • Create New...