Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have an old watch with a sapphire crystal that appears to have been fastened with shellac. I’m assuming that was factory work in 1925. The crystal has been taped on while the watch sat in a drawer over the last 50+ yrs.

does anybody still flow shellac into the crystal bed on the case? Obviously, there are better choices today, but how big of a deal is the originality of this on an old expensive watch?

Posted

Not sure when the first sapphire watch crystals became available, 1925 seems too early as the process for creating synthetic sapphires was first developed  after 1910.  Rolex didn't start using them for watch crystals until 1970, so if this was factory work it would predate this by 45 years.

Otherwise there were watches made with natural sapphire crystals also. Must be quite the watch. Can you post a photo?

Do you think the shellac was applied as a thick varnish adhesive, or flowed with heat? Seems like shellac would be a logical adhesive choice for 1925.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Woolshire said:

I have an old watch with a sapphire crystal that appears to have been fastened with shellac. I’m assuming that was factory work in 1925. 

I'm in agreement with the above posting 1925 seems a bit early for a sapphire crystal are you sure it's not glass? Then doubtful it was shellac I don't think I've ever heard of that being used to glue with a crystal. Then they do make glue for crystals but the most common thing now is epoxy glue.

Posted

I could be wrong, but seems to be real sapphire. So, what did they use as a glue back then? Specifically, on non-round crystals? I know a round case is sometimes heated to fit a crystal.

Posted

G-S Hypo cement has been around since the thirties,  commonly used to affix crystals.

1925? I'm not sure G-S Hypo goes back that far. 

 

Posted
20 minutes ago, Woolshire said:

real sapphire

If you touch a sapphire crystal it will have a cold feeling. It's better at conducting heat then glass.

Looks like from Wikipedia your right synthetic sapphire came into existence In 1902.

 

6 hours ago, Woolshire said:

old expensive watch

Out of curiosity what is the name of this watch?

 

Unfortunately it's a little early but at the link below you'll find a catalogue of 1899 of watch supplies and optical supplies. Conveniently on the crystal page it doesn't say how they're fastened. But in the optics section of course there is optical cement for gluing lenses together which conceivably was used here.

https://archive.org/details/20thcenturycatal00purd

Posted

Here's a link that might find interesting.  It was helping with my memory I was trying remember this Canada Balsam. Basically early glue for lenses  and you look at what it is  kinda like a weird form a shellac in a way  very likely what they might've been using.

http:// [Search domain wp.optics.arizona.edu/optomech/wp-content/uploads/sites/53/2016/10/ClementsTutorial1.doc] https://wp.optics.arizona.edu/optomech/wp-content/uploads/sites/53/2016/10/ClementsTutorial1.doc

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada_balsam

Posted

Wow...thanks for the detective work and info! The watch is a Patek. I’m thinking if anyone used sapphire for crystals, it would be them.

I did get the goo off the crystal and case, using just a small amount of naphtha. Didn’t disturb any patina, at all. I also got the old dried shallac-like stuff off with just a softened toothpick.

 I’m pretty sure the crystal is sapphire and original. 
I am still wondering about the best way to glue it. It fits nicely, but not going to stay in without glue. I know the likely best option is clear epoxy, but am wondering if figuring out exactly what was used at the factory (and if using that) falls into that whole originality concept.

Posted
6 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Looks like from Wikipedia your right synthetic sapphire came into existence In 1902.

Unless my wikipedia reading is incorrect, 1902 is for  synthetic rubies, these would have been small red crystals. They achieved blue sapphire in 1911, again gem-sized, but not gem-quality. I really don't think they had the abilities to create watch-sized optical quality crystals until much later. Depends on the size of the watch, of course. But if it's optically clear and not tinted at all, I'd be suspicious. I'm pretty sure I've seen a photo of a watch covered by a polished natural crystal, but very old and not very clear.

I suspect the advancements enabling watch crystals to be made with synthetic sapphire came from the semiconductor industry, which would correlate with their wider introduction starting in 1970 on the beta21 quartz models.

Interestingly, with all the writing on watches out there, I can't find a good article on the history of using sapphire crystals in watches. Good subject for someone to write an article.

 

 

Posted
20 minutes ago, KOwatch said:

Unless my wikipedia reading is incorrect, 1902 is for  synthetic rubies, these would have been small red crystals. They achieved blue sapphire in 1911, again gem-sized, but not gem-quality. I really don't think they had the abilities to create watch-sized optical quality crystals until much later.

I was trying to be agreeable and cheerful not my usual critical negative self. Out of curiosity I asked at work today because we put a lot of sapphire crystals in For the fun of it I asked my boss. Perhaps the 70s and that would be 1970s not 1870s.

There is another alternative perhaps?  Another possibility would have been quartz optical grade quartz crystal. I'm pretty sure that larger pieces of natural stone. Zero idea when they synthesized quartz.

Posted

Sapphire watch crystals may have come about as a bye product of the defence industry. Single crystal sapphire was grown to use as sensor windows for infrared sensors and missiles, due to it's toughness and being translucent to infrared.  

So possibly created late 50's - 60s, but the military wouldn't want it out in general use. My guess would be no earlier than the 70's ?

Posted

I am familiar with the Patek website.  I’m guessing they won’t tell me anything about the glue they used then or now. But, good thought and I will submit a question.
This sure looked like shellac. However, I would think that they would have used something more colorless. Maybe this was colorless back then????

It sounds like we’re not sure what was used originally. Fish glue or potentially a rubber-based glue...or a near-colorless shellac ?‍♂️

As for current times, clear epoxy is commonly used. UV glue and G-S are also popular. Since this isn’t something that seems to be a “originality” issue, I need to choose one that will hold the darn thing on, and move forward.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello and welcome to the fo4um. Enjoy
    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy.
    • You're asking a pretty broad question and you didn't specify the machine but yes it's simple especially if you have the right machine. The question has problems but I'll take it as it is. Is it really that simple yes especially if you have the right machine. So in the video below he's making a screw and yes it really is that simple but pay attention to the machine it is not simple at all probably wasn't cheap but it is small it will probably fit in your garage. Unfortunately wouldn't fit in my garage as it's far too cluttered up with things. In the video he talks about making a screw and pay attention to the machine. The machine has lots and lots and lots of cutters and lots of things to do lots of machining all-in-one machine conceivably one step after another all programmable. If you look at his channel lots of CNC's stuff and there are several other videos related to this machine. He goes to the factory where they talk about it and show all the other machines they make in Switzerland.  I did look up the specifications the machine I don't recall the price it's not going to cut wheels I think it has a maximum diameter around 11 mm basically it's really good for making small diameter watch parts. Then in one of the other videos he goes to a factory that used to make parts with waterpowered machinery been in business for 100 years and everything they now make is made with CNC machines including this one. What was interesting with the factory photo was that when they make some parts they can put them on a optical comparator comparator compares with whatever the reference is and the machine can be programmed to adjust its cutting to make sure everything is actually being made to specifications. Oh and then somewhere in all of this there was at least one picture of a balance staff can't have a CNC Swiss machine without making balance staffs.   It would be really nice if we had pictures of the machine. Then yes if you look at the page for wheel cutting you can enter parameters and it will generate a G code but he left out things? Notice he has a picture of a complete wheel but the G code isn't making a complete wheel it's only cutting the gear teeth I don't see whereas the program for crossing out the spokes? Typically when you see people cutting gears once the teeth are cut most the time the spokes are cut by hand. Occasionally someone will mill them out but typically not with the program which seems strange if you have CNC capability for instance one of my friends fill it used to design assembly line equipment or things to make things. So his hobby was to continue to make tools to make things like clocks. Very interesting and clever clocks but his true fund was making the machines to make the clocks. Then machine is not controlled by G code like we would typically find today as the stepping motor controller he has was made a long time ago and the individual controllers used a textbased program. So the company had a editor you could write a program to cause each the stepping motors to do something. So basically once you figure out how to cut a gear he would just change the parameters for different size gears so here's an example of a gear as you can see we have the teeth and the spokes. Then we have a picture the machine which sucks because it would've been so much nicer if I could've taken a picture when it was cutting a gears so we can see things better. Then yes there is a worm gear stepping motor indexing this is a mini lathe and the indexing is at the end of the lathe head hiding. The basic operation of this machine would be brass sheet not cut to a specific diameter size not even round mounted on the machine. Then it turns and a milling cutter will cut the diameter. Then the gear would be cut with a gear cutter. The same mill cutter for the diameter although conceivably change the size I don't know but basically the same milling for cutting the outer diameter would be used to cut the spokes. I really can't remember how he did the center hole but whatever it was was very precise.          
    • Yeah I know the site and the creator of it.  the two video clips are good examples of the quicker method and a full tear down.  the quick method will work in many cases. But not always and not for all the different movements.  I strongly suggest to not bend the four tabs as was done in the first clip.  Instead there are three tabs that insert into the top plate, Much saver way as to not break a tab.
    • I found a motor that is 3/4 hp and another that is 1.2hp. They come with speed controller. So I don’t think I would need a wiring diagram. But I sure appreciate you offering your help! Do you think 1.2 hp would be too much for a watchmaker’s lathe?
×
×
  • Create New...