Jump to content

Demagnetizer Recommendations


Don

Recommended Posts

@Endeavor: -Yes, but your version takes a bit of "skill" to get to work! :)

The versions with coils work with distance attenuation - the field gets weaker as you move the part/movement away from the coil.

The automatic ones often use current attenuation, the field gets weaker around the part/movement  so the part can be still.

 

img_02.jpg

 

(picture from: https://www.j-ndk.co.jp/en/product/index_datsuji.html)

 

In my version a capacitor is charged (takes abt .3s) and is then then is used in a parallel LC-circuit that takes abt. 50ms for the field to go  from fully charged to zero. (depending on capacitor values, voltage and size of coil).

The biggest plus is that you do not need to lift/move the movement in the coil/field and the results are equal time and time again! :)

Edited by RCDesign
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the additional information :)

I now also understand again how the coil / capacitor circuitry works. Where I was initially a bit puzzled about was what kind of capacitor was used and therefor whether the AC was first converted to DC. Now knowing the L/C principle again, it may be wise to put up a schematic of your system with the details of the components. We don't want somebody to grab an electrolytic capacitor and "blows the place" or seriously harm himself....... The modern electrolytic capacitors do rupture, or have a relief-valve, but the old ones don't, and they take off like a rocket when connected to AC or hooked up wrongly to DC. (don't ask me how I know :biggrin:)

So if you have a simple schematic of your system with the components details, then at least that part is covered ;)

Thanks again!

 

Edited by Endeavor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other thing that is needed when playing with magnets and watches is a way of figuring out if your watch really is magnetized or not.

So there's the old-fashioned way with a compass image attached for how to do that. then a link to a free app for your phone from a company that wants to sell a really expensive demagnetizer.

https://www.lepsi.ch/watch-demagnetizer/

 

Check the magnetic field.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
On 5/19/2016 at 7:17 AM, oldhippy said:

Link doesn’t work. Could you get a pic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 11 months later...

I have an old (1940?) demagnetizer. I’ve read about how some of these old ones are maybe too strong to put complete watches through, but never had an issue until yesterday: I put a complete cased watch in the hole, pushed the button and then slowly pulled it out, like I have 100’s of times. This time, the roller jewel actually got knocked out! When I took the back off the watch to see what happened I found it (luckily) on the ledge of the case! Looks like these strong demagnetizers can be too much sometimes?

I better buy a less aggressive one for complete watches. Anyone else ever see such a thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Woolshire said:

I better buy a less aggressive one for complete watches. Anyone else ever see such a thing?

No need to buy another one, just start a bit more far away from the object. However it's also true some demagnatizers are made for mechanical shop use not watchmaking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Woolshire said:

This time, the roller jewel actually got knocked out!

You didn't tell us what kind of a watch this is or how old it is? I think you'd find under normal circumstances it would take a heck of the impact to knock a roller jewel out. Very common on older watches that they become loose with time so anytime you're working on older watch your always supposed to check the roller jewel because quite a few times are on the verge of falling out anyway.

Watch companies are interesting for their recommendations. Omega is concerned of having too strong of a magnetic fields but then there are so looking at wristwatches. They don't have to deal with the things we deal with in the field that are often bigger than a wristwatch. Then there also looking for a tool that will tell you if the watches magnetized because compasses really aren't reliable.

I snipped out an image of unacceptable tools strangely enough they don't show ever using the Elma Antimag? Then another image of the important points kinda hinting at the magnetic field for removing magnetism has to somehow be really special and multi-directions. Which is interesting if you look at the instruction sheet for the Horotec Magtest What they show looks exactly like the same kind a magnetic field should get from the Elma Antimag .

https://www.witschi.com/en/products/teslascope-2/

http://horotec.ch/news/MSA19.910/102/lang/2

 

Omega unacceptable tools for magnetism.JPG

Omega important points magnetism.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 1/29/2022 at 6:28 AM, JohnR725 said:

You didn't tell us what kind of a watch this is or how old it is? I think you'd find under normal circumstances it would take a heck of the impact to knock a roller jewel out. Very common on older watches that they become loose with time so anytime you're working on older watch your always supposed to check the roller jewel because quite a few times are on the verge of falling out anyway.

Watch companies are interesting for their recommendations. Omega is concerned of having too strong of a magnetic fields but then there are so looking at wristwatches. They don't have to deal with the things we deal with in the field that are often bigger than a wristwatch. Then there also looking for a tool that will tell you if the watches magnetized because compasses really aren't reliable.

I snipped out an image of unacceptable tools strangely enough they don't show ever using the Elma Antimag? Then another image of the important points kinda hinting at the magnetic field for removing magnetism has to somehow be really special and multi-directions. Which is interesting if you look at the instruction sheet for the Horotec Magtest What they show looks exactly like the same kind a magnetic field should get from the Elma Antimag .

https://www.witschi.com/en/products/teslascope-2/

http://horotec.ch/news/MSA19.910/102/lang/2

 

Omega unacceptable tools for magnetism.JPG

Omega important points magnetism.JPG

That’s interesting… Which demagnetizer does Omega recommend then?

I’ve read elsewhere that the Greiner is supposed to be strong enough to demagnetize a cased watch, but wouldn’t have thought it could be too strong…

In your opinion is Omega being overly cautious? Most demagnetizers don’t exactly quantify exactly how powerful they are, so we would have no way of knowing either…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ifibrin said:

Which demagnetizer does Omega recommend then?

If you look at the section you quoted there are two links those go to what they recommend. We do get in the image I snipped out hinting remarks of yes it could be too strong for and they don't specify this some watches. I've occasionally see on some wristwatches when they hairspring is jumping around wallets being demagnetized will have it looping part of it over the regulator pins in the F they go in fix that or just do it again that usually sometimes fixes itself. Then I don't know about the silicon hairsprings whether that is a possibility of damaging blows because I have a suspicion that silicon might be brittle even if it is a spring.

That of course there's the other little problem Omega's not dealing with really large watches like pocket watches.

Plus of course they have really deep pockets and they can recommend whatever they feel like because well I can. But I do like the idea of the solid-state detectors at these things have that tell you whether you have a magnetic field are not as I don't think the compass method is really reliable even though it's been around for very long time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
On 5/7/2018 at 2:04 AM, JohnR725 said:

I was looking to get a demagnetizer so read all the posts in the demagnetizer section, i followed your link to the homemade demagnetizer using the microwave transformer, it seems to be the same type of circuit used in the elma demagnetizer, so thought i'd give the homemade one ago.

I already had a couple of old microwave transformers along with the other bits needed, diode, resistor, switches, i orderd a motor run start capacitor that came yesterday, i assembled it into a plastic biscuit box, it's a simple straight forward build, it works really well, i've never had a demagnetizer but seems better than the type you have to withdraw the watch away from slowly that i've seen discussed online.

I've ordered a new box to remount it into rather than a biscuit box to make it look a bit more professional, once it comes i will post some photos of the finished demagnetizer.

Thanks johnR725 for the link, that was a good find.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I got round to boxing the homemade demanetizer up last night, i moved it from the biscuit box, so now looks a bit more sturdy, it's easy and cheap to build and perfoms as well as the branded demagnetizer costing hundreds of pounds. I printed a crosshairs onto a self adhesive postal label to stick on the box a the centre of demagnetization area.

The only variation i made from the parts list was i used a 1N4007 diode instead of the 1N4004 listed as i have plenty of these, they are booth a 1 amp diode, i will change this diode to a 1N5408 diode as these are rated 3 amps.

 

https://www.instructables.com/Demagnetizer-From-a-Microwave-Transformer/

 

 

 

 

demag.jpg

demagin.jpg

demagb.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, valleyguy said:

I got round to boxing the homemade demanetizer up last night, i moved it from the biscuit box, so now looks a bit more sturdy, it's easy and cheap to build and perfoms as well as the branded demagnetizer costing hundreds of pounds. I printed a crosshairs onto a self adhesive postal label to stick on the box a the centre of demagnetization area.

The only variation i made from the parts list was i used a 1N4007 diode instead of the 1N4004 listed as i have plenty of these, they are booth a 1 amp diode, i will change this diode to a 1N5408 diode as these are rated 3 amps.

The microwave transformer looks like an overkill. Do you think a smaller, say a 25VA transformer, will work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Michael1962 said:

Do you need to have a demagnetiser for working on clocks?

typically are only worrying about balance wheels with their hair Springs. As hairsprings do not like to be around magnets or influenced by being magnetized. So yes some clocks would but only for the balance wheel assembly or the platform escapement

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, valleyguy said:

The only variation i made from the parts list was i used a 1N4007 diode instead of the 1N4004 listed as i have plenty of these, they are booth a 1 amp diode, i will change this diode to a 1N5408 diode as these are rated 3 amps.

Nice!

You should be ok with a 1N4007 diode. The 20 Ohm resistor would limit a lot of the inrush current into the capacitor, which is a pretty low value anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/30/2022 at 11:45 AM, HectorLooi said:

The microwave transformer looks like an overkill. Do you think a smaller, say a 25VA transformer, will work?

If you have one of these cheap "dumpsters" kicking around in your garage, they have a "midsize" transformer, see my DIY "Zapper" below ....

233291208_EinhellBatt-charger.jpg.e2f4d6266a699a4090dc4bafe3b691d6.jpg.2d887d5a4f34600f04032d217f96b136.jpg

On 6/30/2022 at 1:53 PM, gbyleveldt said:

You should be ok with a 1N4007 diode. The 20 Ohm resistor would limit a lot of the inrush current into the capacitor, which is a pretty low value anyway.

With regards to the inrush current, my first resistors blew / burned out after repetitive used within a short period of time. I ended up with with these 6Ω 50watt resistors, three of them in series and as it happened, with the diode in between. Also the diode and the momentary switch have to be of ample capacity. I can't see the diode number which I used, but it's a beefy one. The momentary push button has a 15Amp rating. I do admit that I got "slightly" carried away with the capacitor; 45 µF 😆

My "Zapper" zaps very well and doesn't overheat after repetitive use 😉

365634397_ScreenShot2022-07-04at07_24_21.png.bd82e8031b27c8cf47961a3d048a696a.png

IMG_1865.thumb.JPG.9491a60e941a439c224b097a2fd37128.JPG

IMG_1868.thumb.JPG.1dea0ff426ce2e69b6a56654c214ba06.JPG

 

Edited by Endeavor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Endeavor said:

With regards to the inrush current, my first resistors blew / burned out after repetitive used over a short period. I ended up with with these 6Ω 50watt resistors, three of them in series and as it happened, with the diode in between. Also the diode and the momentary switch have to be of ample capacity. I can't see the diode number which I used, but it's a beefy one. The momentary push button has a 15Amp rating. I do admit that I got "slightly" carried away with the capacitor; 45 µF 😆

Heh, 45uF is a looot of capacitor for that circuit and would have substantial amount of inrush. Just eyeballing the size of your transformer, I’d hazard a guess you’d get away with a cap 5 times smaller and still generate enough of a discharge into the transformer without saturating its core like is likely happening now. When you saturate the core, it doesn’t make a larger magnetic field, it just converts that energy to some heat.

Edited by gbyleveldt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The part was how it fell out of the movement - the train wheel bridge wasn’t screwed in.    I’ll probably dismantle the part, if I can, to work it out.    The train of wheels ran fine - it was only once the keyless works were installed I noticed the problem. 
    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
×
×
  • Create New...