Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

anyone else ever wonder if you can clean or recycle Rodico? No matter how hard I try making sure I only use it with cots or gloves on, it's inevitable: it will get dirty/contaminated and eventually I break out some fresh stuff so I'm not leaving a snail trail on everything it touches. this question dawned on me yesterday as I was doing just that(getting some fresh stuff, that is). Another question-has anybody used the "premium" Rodico? what's with the 'premium' tag and higher price? Talk atcha tomorrow. its Taps, and lights out.

Posted

Hi Mike    I used the same stuff (typeclean) when servicing typewriters may years ago for cleaning the type heads once it was used up and dirty it went in the bin.  The old stuff from using on watches can be reused for holding parts on the bench when measuring or other like tasks but the bin is where it usually ends up.  

Premium Rodico is likly to be an altered formula designed to remove money from your pocket it will be a bit more tacky so it collects more dollars/pounds    .

  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Posted

I always have two pieces in use. The “clean” piece, and the “dirty” piece. I use the dirty one mostly, and the clean one for critical stuff. I also occasionally knead it to expose a “clean” area- clean enough for the task at hand anyway. It picks up the dust from the air and bench so keep it under cover when not in use  

I also have one bar of gray premium rodico. I hate it. It’s softer and stickier- it tends to leave bits of gray rodico behind. Seems like chewing gum actually. I may give it another try but i feel it is not worth the up charge. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I've often seen watchmakers videos on YouTube where their Rodico looks like a small dirty rodent.  I expect that if it gets any more hairy it'll scurry itself off to the bin.

I also keep a clean piece, for cleaning inside of crystals before final casing.

Anyone used any other type?  A*F Rub-Off Cleaning Compound?

  • Haha 1
Posted

There's no cleaning it, as above, keep a little clean piece for clean stuff and the dirty for odd jobs.

 

The Premium Rodico is total garbage. I don't know a single professional who likes it at all.  I haven't tried the A*F, but they recently were bought by an industrial tool supply house here, and I suspect their offering will diminish quite a bit.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

My mentor taught me a trick which he learnt from his Swiss master. Wrap a tiny blob of Rodico on a pegwood, like a Q-tip. You'll save a whole lot more of the stuff. And change it more often.

He also told me that the stuff from stationery stores, like Faber Castell's, work perfectly well, and at a fraction of the price of Rodico.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted
15 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi Mike    I used the same stuff (typeclean) when servicing typewriters may years ago for cleaning the type heads once it was used up and dirty it went in the bin.  The old stuff from using on watches can be reused for holding parts on the bench when measuring or other like tasks but the bin is where it usually ends up.  

Premium Rodico is likly to be an altered formula designed to remove money from your pocket it will be a bit more tacky so it collects more dollars/pounds    .

hi W2!  I usually keep the mousy stuff around for odds and ends yeah. so safe to say, keep it fresh for the clean work, right?

Posted
15 hours ago, Tudor said:

I always have two pieces in use. The “clean” piece, and the “dirty” piece. I use the dirty one mostly, and the clean one for critical stuff. I also occasionally knead it to expose a “clean” area- clean enough for the task at hand anyway. It picks up the dust from the air and bench so keep it under cover when not in use  

I also have one bar of gray premium rodico. I hate it. It’s softer and stickier- it tends to leave bits of gray rodico behind. Seems like chewing gum actually. I may give it another try but i feel it is not worth the up charge. 

I think one of the key takeaways is keeping it covered, of which I am miserable at. once done, off to the corner of my benchtop, free to pick up anything and everything passing by. I think I'm going to start covering it because I'm like that peanuts character Pigpen, I attract and carry around an ever present cloud of dust wherever I go...what I'm hearing there isn't a way to recycle it and get it un-dirty again. 

Posted
Just now, MechanicMike said:

I also have one bar of gray premium rodico. I hate it. It’s softer and stickier- it tends to leave bits of gray rodico behind. Seems like chewing gum actually. I may give it another try but i feel it is not worth the up charge.

WW kinda said the same thing. good only at removing money from your pocket...thats good tho because i was going to try it. maybe I won't.

Posted
8 hours ago, AshF said:

I've often seen watchmakers videos on YouTube where their Rodico looks like a small dirty rodent.  I expect that if it gets any more hairy it'll scurry itself off to the bin.

I also keep a clean piece, for cleaning inside of crystals before final casing.

Anyone used any other type?  A*F Rub-Off Cleaning Compound?

yep. mine looks like what a cat might cough up...

I've seen that A*F stuff just the other day and thought I might give it a run..

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

There's no cleaning it, as above, keep a little clean piece for clean stuff and the dirty for odd jobs.

 

The Premium Rodico is total garbage. I don't know a single professional who likes it at all.  I haven't tried the A*F, but they recently were bought by an industrial tool supply house here, and I suspect their offering will diminish quite a bit.

I might try some even quicker before that happens....

Posted
3 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

He also told me that the stuff from stationery stores, like Faber Castell's, work perfectly well, and at a fraction of the price of Rodico.

know the name of it and/or what it's used for? is it that eraser stuff?

Posted

Hi Mike  Keep it in a zip loc bag and cut a little off to use and bag it seperatly untill knackered then bin it .  The stationry store stuff is somewhat like Blu Tac in the UK but BluTac is a little sticky,  commonly use for sticking notes to walls on a temporary basis and can be removed easily and re used.  I have some in the workshop for various uses including holding small parts (click springs and the like) the little Bu**ers dont fly away .

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi,  I just obtained a Kinetic 5M42-0E39.  A lot of great info in this thread.  For those of you that worked on yours what did you do for a movement holder.  There are some out there for specific Seiko movements but I don't see any for the 5M42.  Just measure the diameter of the movement and do it that way?  Any luck with the original band replacement?  It looks like Watch Plaza has the rubber straps that look like  the original minus the metal bits for band and clasp.  Thanks!
    • Thinking of best fit did we ever look at fingerprinting this movement? Then identification of watches? This actually comes up a lot on this group of people especially with older watches thinking they're going to identify some vintage no name whatever and know they're not going to. But even more important books like bestfit only exist to supply spare parts. This means the movement had to have been made in sufficient quantities and exported out of Japan for a company like bestfit to supply spare parts. So simplistic rule would be unless parts were readily available cross reference books to identify it for finding parts will not exist. One of things I was curious about I went back to the first page and part of the problem is your watches so much older than the one that launched this discussion if you look at the original posting picture it's a screwless balance with a shock protected system yours is much much older. Then of course older also brings up the problem of parts identification books because they were really only made in specific time spans and do not cover an infinite quantity of years unfortunately although bestfit Did have some older books but if I remember right I don't think Seiko shows up even until basically the last of their books because it comes back to they weren't exported out of Japan insufficient quantities for anyone to care about spare parts unfortunately    
    • I'm working on a 602 that has date. Well the bridge has Cal 602 on it. That was a complete pig. I ended up laying mine in place and hoping for the best! I didn't want to hav e you keep going over those darn pivots - painful. Well it all seems to have worked so....... perhaps I was lucky?   And thanks so much for that photo. After disassembling I found my footage completely out of ficus. Lesson to myself (and anyone else) don't use a GoPro less than 30cm (at which distance the watch is in the distance anyway).
    • Job done. After a lot of fiddling and testing  I used this method . I purchased the correct size glass from eBay. To drill the hole I used a diamond core drill bit . I have a small pillar  drill press and submerged the glass in water inside of a jar lid with a cork mat underneath the glass. I drilled very slowly and it was successful but it did chip a bit but it’s not visible. A very happy customer..          
    • I've not bought a replacement mainspring before. According to my digital calipers the broken spring in my Lancashire Watch Co. Pocket Watch is 2.4mm wide & 2.0mm thick & the barrel is 16mm diameter.  The nearest Cousins has to this (GR6573) only differs in the barrel width - it's 15.5mm . Is this difference significant? Also, the old spring has a pin across the outer end to secure it in the barrel but the Cousins info implies it's "a normal bridle" (whatever that means) rather than a "T" (which I assume is how my old spring is categorised). Help, please!
×
×
  • Create New...