Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello,

I found a really cheap Rolex replica and I though it would be nice to practice on something other than Seikos and Orients, I did the usual cleaning oiling and everything went smoothly until the point where I came to put the otomatic bridge back and boy I have no any idea where things go I've never seen a winding bridge with so many gears, anyway I dicided to have a look on google but the damn thing has no markings on it nothing at all, I don't care about this watch I'm probably gonna throw it in a box and forget about it (I would hit it with an angle grinder but I don't have one) but I really want to get it back together so I can feel a little bit good about my self

20200718_113326.jpg

20200718_113339.jpg

20200718_162455.jpg

20200718_162509.jpg

Posted
27 minutes ago, Ammar said:

, I did the usual cleaning oiling and everything went smoothly until the point where I came to put the otomatic bridge back and boy I have no any idea where things go I've never seen a winding bridge with so many gears,

It's a normal reversing wheels device which should not present difficulties. I suggest you take many picture when taking things apart.

Posted
3 minutes ago, jdm said:

It's a normal reversing wheels device which should not present difficulties. I suggest you take many picture when taking things apart.

I tried placing the wheels for like 30 minutes but to no avail, it is a hand wound as well so it can still run.

 I usually take alot of pictures but I don't know I guess I got lazy this time

Posted
22 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

Tricky, it looks like a Chinese construction, but there are so many small scale producers, and there are no obvious numbers or marks on it.

Not the typical Chinese Standard movement though, as they typically have the balance opposite the winder.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_standard_movement

 

Why would a peoducer not leave their mark though? Is it for legal reasons?

Wouldn't be good for them if they put some markings in case somebody wants to buy from them?

Posted
Just now, Ammar said:

I tried placing the wheels for like 30 minutes but to no avail,

Try again tomorrow and they will fit. It will help if you search online for an explanation of how a non-Seiko auto winding works. 

Posted
1 minute ago, jdm said:

Try again tomorrow and they will fit. It will help if you search online for an explanation of how a non-Seiko auto winding works. 

Quote

 

Why would a peoducer not leave their mark though? Is it for legal reasons?
Wouldn't be good for them if they put some markings in case somebody wants to buy from them?

 

They are Chinese, they don't want about their name be known but just to sell the product in the largest possible numbers. And even if you knew their name and address, no diagram or parts would e available..

  • Like 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, spectre6000 said:

Post up some pictures of the automatic assembly components. Figuring out mechanical puzzles like that is my jam!

I don't know if you can see the wheels properly this is the best I can do, have fun :thumbsu:

20200718_191346.jpg

20200718_191325.jpg

20200718_191259.jpg

Posted (edited)

I'm not an expert on chinese movements but isn't this a standard ST6D Movement (ST6D-L) ? 
There might be some tech sheets out there, think it is aold at counsinsuk too, they usually keep some sheet available.

Edited by HSL
Posted
57 minutes ago, HSL said:

I'm not an expert on chinese movements but isn't this a standard ST6D Movement (ST6D-L) ? 
There might be some tech sheets out there, think it is aold at counsinsuk too, they usually keep some sheet available.

it is actually an ST6D movement but I couldn't find any sheets or manuals online the only useful thing that I've leaned is that it's actually an over-sized lady's movement and it's widely available for about 30$, I think I'll try one more time tomorrow and see what happens I'm pretty sure it's gonna end up flying out of  the window.

:fpc:

Posted
12 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Chinese aren't expert on Chinese watches either. 

True. Time ago I bought a Chinese "triple date" mov.t for a replacement. Actually I had to buy twice because the first time I failed to spot some small difference from the pictures. When I asked what factory made these or at least a clear designation I was told that these things don't apply to their domestic movement ?!?

Posted
7 hours ago, Ammar said:

I don't know if you can see the wheels properly this is the best I can do, have fun :thumbsu:

20200718_191346.jpg

20200718_191325.jpg

20200718_191259.jpg

Well... The thing is, the wheels only go in one way. The jewels have different size holes, and for the most part not all wheels will fit in all the jewels. That'll narrow you down to a degree. Then there is the clearances on the automatic bridge. They're sized for particular wheels, and again, only one way. Then there's there are different sized teeth and leaves. Ditto. 

Numbering the gears from left to right 1-6, 1&2 look related. 1 probably fits inside 2. 3 goes adjacent the ratchet wheel as it's the only gear with teeth that would mesh. 2, 5, and 6 should all easily be placed by their positions on the automatic bridge. Start with whichever one meshes with the rotor gear (I'm guessing 6). The way it meshes with that gear will dictate which end is up. Then it looks like 5 is up next, ditto on the orientation. It's difficult to tell what's going on with 1, 3, and 4. 1 is especially interesting looking... It may have a hole through it and some kind of dog clutch? Reversing mechanism? Difficult to tell by the photo.... I'm having a hard time figuring out how 4 fits into the mechanism, but I'm sure with the movement in hand and everything else situated, it'll be obvious.

Posted
On 7/19/2020 at 3:33 AM, spectre6000 said:

Well... The thing is, the wheels only go in one way. The jewels have different size holes, and for the most part not all wheels will fit in all the jewels. That'll narrow you down to a degree. Then there is the clearances on the automatic bridge. They're sized for particular wheels, and again, only one way. Then there's there are different sized teeth and leaves. Ditto. 

Numbering the gears from left to right 1-6, 1&2 look related. 1 probably fits inside 2. 3 goes adjacent the ratchet wheel as it's the only gear with teeth that would mesh. 2, 5, and 6 should all easily be placed by their positions on the automatic bridge. Start with whichever one meshes with the rotor gear (I'm guessing 6). The way it meshes with that gear will dictate which end is up. Then it looks like 5 is up next, ditto on the orientation. It's difficult to tell what's going on with 1, 3, and 4. 1 is especially interesting looking... It may have a hole through it and some kind of dog clutch? Reversing mechanism? Difficult to tell by the photo.... I'm having a hard time figuring out how 4 fits into the mechanism, but I'm sure with the movement in hand and everything else situated, it'll be obvious.

I spent 40 minutes yesterday fiddling with this thing and it just refuses to go back together and I decided to drop it, I'm so frustrated but there's nothing I can do

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Get well soon Old Hippy, torn muscles.,  not good
    • Id love to see how he has the output shaft mounted to this setup, as I have the same rotary stage and stepper in my build.
    • If you see at least one thread protruding, or even a half, then you may have a chance using this "tool", but don't squeeze hard. Lot's of patience, and if you notice any signs of loctite or other adhesives, then apply several drops of acetone on top of broken stem. Use heat (hair dryer) also. You should be able gradually turn it counterclockwise, just like i did on this broken Timex stem, which was glued with something like nail hardener. Then you can use an extender to save your broken stem. https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/513DVvkfW5L.__AC_SX300_SY300_QL70_ML2_.jpg   You can also try cutting a small grove / slot on top of the broken stem to use 0.7mm flat screwdriver.   Depending on the Crown material and Stem material, you can try dissolving the stem. 
    • How long had it been without any wind before you first put it on the timegrapher?  Perhaps there was some debris / old lubricant that loosened up while you were waiting to do the 24 hour reading? I recently serviced a Seiko 6319 that immediately after service was absolutely horrible on the timegrapher - 24 hours later (without me doing anything) it was rock solid!  I was a little surprised by this (as I have seen improvements in amplitude after letting it run in but never a watch going from useless to great!). I was suspicious that some dirt must still be in there so I took it apart and cleaned and lubcricated it again and had exactly the same experience - snow storm that after some hours turned into a nice straigh line with good amplitude 🤷‍♂️
    • Yes, I know it was able to run before just enough that everything supposed to be affixed with shellac could fall out. I won't get back to work on this watch for several days at least, but one thing you mentioned about the banking pin adjustments being intended for fork horn clearance got me wondering.... The last adjustment I made to the entry stone yesterday did not solve the problem when the balance is installed. The escape teeth can't quite clear the stone when the balance swings. But I thought it was going to work because manually snapping the fork back and forth did allow the escape wheel to advance almost all the time. I wonder if there's another issue with the impulse jewel, that I have to shellac again anyway. I am going to measure the fork slot and the jewel because I am curious if it is the right size or possibly narrower than it should be. My thinking is if the horn clearance is too great maybe it is not getting enough impulse to clear the escape tooth. But pushing the fork with a tool can move it far enough to clear the escape wheel tooth.  I'll see later in the week. I didn't expect a big challenge from this watch because it ticked for 5 minutes before stopping without shellac. As always I was way wrong.
×
×
  • Create New...