Jump to content

The balance wheel stops !


Recommended Posts

Hello,I dismantled an automatic mouvement that I took from a Sewor.

The problem is that when I reassemble it, everything is okay, I put on the balance wheel which spins, but when I screw the balance wheel bridge, tjr balance wheel stops.

The pivots aren't broken, the spiral looks okay...

I don't understand !!! Can someone please help me !

Thank You !

Post Scriptum : It worked before I dismantled it :(

Here is some pictures :

930aa0af3aadca9dcb231f7d13bb0537.jpg

8087e782c53c1a4d71afedee7f0bc1d8.jpg

6faef89ff2f47c209a7acf5b94d8c3fa.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you re-assemble the end pivot stones in the right position? check if one (or both) are upside down?

If not, might be that the handshake is to tight. If that is the case, under the balance cock just make a small scratch in the metal (making the balance cock a micro thicker) to marginally increase the space for the pivot between the jewels. This will allow the balance to rotate more freely. This is not something you would need to do often and only on very old movements, so it might be just the stones that are not er-assembled right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you re-assemble the end pivot stones in the right position? check if one (or both) are upside down?
If not, might be that the handshake is to tight. If that is the case, under the balance cock just make a small scratch in the metal (making the balance cock a micro thicker) to marginally increase the space for the pivot between the jewels. This will allow the balance to rotate more freely. This is not something you would need to do often and only on very old movements, so it might be just the stones that are not er-assembled right. 

I didn't disassembled the end pivot stones ! So the problem isn't from there ! I will keep your idea of making a small scratch in the metal in a corner of my head, thank you.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi As a starter do what Nucejo suggested and fit a shim under the balance cock. For example a dial washer or aluminium foil   just to increase the endshake on the balance staff.  What appears to be the problem is lack of endshake.

Okay ! Thank you !
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You showed the cock and balance assembly in second picture, that is when you had the chance to visually inspect if both pivots are intact and undamaged.

If lower and upper pivots are both undamaged and balance stops as you tighten cock screw, then end stones are pushing on pivots.

You can guage but shimming is prefered as it is not destructive. 

Place a piece of thin aluminum foil under the cock, to raise the cock.

There is a slight chance of bent pivot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You showed the cock and balance assembly in second picture, that is when you had the chance to visually inspect if both pivots are intact and undamaged.
If lower and upper pivots are both undamaged and balance stops as you tighten cock screw, then end stones are pushing on pivots.
You can guage but shimming is prefered as it is not destructive. 
Place a piece of thin aluminum foil under the cock, to raise the cock.
There is a slight chance of bent pivot.

Okay, Thank you very much !
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, AdrianNOGUES said:


No the movement is almost new !

Just because it is almost new you could have done something during the service....did you take the balance out properly? Did you you check balance staff under very high magnification? Did you peg the jewels and Possibly push them out of position? Did you reattach the hairspring to the regulator stud properly that is if you removed it from the cock during service? I would agree with shimming the balance cock but this should rarely need to be done on a fairly new movement. I would put money on a cracked jewel/bent staff ( which could happen if you seated the balance wrong when you screwed it down)  also you should check the pallet action make sure it snaps back and forth before putting in the balance issue could lie there too. Also pallet and or Impulse jewel could have gotten loose during cleaning, esp if you used IPA for long periods.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

686f2b53f63dd61cf40a541aba48cd52.jpg
Here is a better picture of the balance wheel.
I looked on the internet and some balance wheel doesnt have a thin pivot on the top and some have.
So I'm asking myself is this one broken ? It would be logic. Sorry for all the people I contradicted, and thank you for your help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AdrianNOGUES said:

+33s/d, 204 of amplitude, 0.0ms beat error

the reason for asking the question is if I was running before it should be running again and you shouldn't have to put shims under the balance wheel that correct for I have no idea what?

then your first picture was taken at the wrong angle as it's really hard for me to see what I think I'm seeing? It almost looks like the balance bridge is not down all the way it's up a little on the right-hand side? you should make sure the balance bridge is down tight and parallel and that the balance wheel can still spin before you put the screw in

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

the reason for asking the question is if I was running before it should be running again and you shouldn't have to put shims under the balance wheel that correct for I have no idea what?

Absolutely. I was surprised to see that this kind of advice given promptly when the practice is generally frowned upon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the reason for asking the question is if I was running before it should be running again and you shouldn't have to put shims under the balance wheel that correct for I have no idea what?
then your first picture was taken at the wrong angle as it's really hard for me to see what I think I'm seeing? It almost looks like the balance bridge is not down all the way it's up a little on the right-hand side? you should make sure the balance bridge is down tight and parallel and that the balance wheel can still spin before you put the screw in
 

I agree with you ! Thats why for me the aluminum foil etc etc is the last thing I want to do ! For me I need to solve the problem, not avoid it !
On the picture, you're right, the cock wasn't down all the way because it was the only position where it allowed the balance wheel to spin, it was straight though (not one side more engaged than the other)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely. I was surprised to see that this kind of advice given promptly when the practice is generally frowned upon.

Me too, it's not a good solution when you know that after you, watchmaker will have to solve the problem, the only thing it does is avoiding it to make it much important later :(
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Michael said:

Your photo is not that clear, but unfortunately it looks like you have lost your top pivot. It should be the same as the bottom pivot.

Indeed, well spotted. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi    The fitting of a shim is NOT a fix its a diagnostic aid in as much as to slightly increase the end shake of the balance when trying to determine the problem, and once proved on way or the other, then removed and look to rectifying the problem.   I have had watches where the end shake was adjusted by digging a divot in the plate there fore raising the the balance cock and increasing the endshake also had them with shims in to do the same both left as a permanent fix    Not reccomended.   

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is not rare at all, the dial code and case code don't usually match.
    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
×
×
  • Create New...